Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › Telemetry pipelines › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Telemetry pipelines for enterprise buyers

Asked as “telemetry pipeline”, and as “observability pipeline tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
40%
Clear leader
40Cribl Stream28OpenTelemetry Collector09Datadog23others

40% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▼−4Since October 2026: 44% → 40%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Cribl Stream held the lead, −4 points on 44%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Cribl Stream40%5%44endorsed leader▼−4Since October 2026: 44% → 40%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.44% → 40%
02OpenTelemetry Collector28%2%58accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 28% → 28%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.28% → 28%
03Datadog9%37%27criticized challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 9%
04Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline4%0%19accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
05Grafana Cloud2%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
06Datadog Observability Pipelines2%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15New Relic0%60%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Fluentd0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Splunk Observability Cloud0%40%20criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11Dynatrace0%33%18criticized challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 0%
12Elastic Observability0%30%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Prometheus0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Fluent Bit0%4%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Vector0%4%26accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
09Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Cribl Stream40%
02OpenTelemetry Collector28%
03Datadog9%
04Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline4%
05Grafana Cloud2%
06Datadog Observability Pipelines2%
07Vector0%
08Fluent Bit0%
09Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline0%
10Prometheus0%
11Dynatrace0%
12Elastic Observability0%
13Splunk Observability Cloud0%
14Fluentd0%
15New Relic0%

What they warned about

Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Datadog
37%
10 of 27 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid or heavily scrutinize: Observability stacks built entirely around proprietary agents and ingestion formats—historically characteristic of platforms like Datadog” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Dynatrace
33%
6 of 18 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“notoriously hard for procurement to forecast” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Splunk Observability Cloud
40%
8 of 20 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Splunk (with Data Stream Processor): Viable if you're already standardized on them, but they're more platform-tied than dedicated pipelines.” Grok 4.20, paraphrase prompt
Logstash
80%
4 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Operating self-hosted, legacy index-heavy search clusters (such as un-managed Elasticsearch/Logstash/Kibana ...) without dedicated platform teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

68 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 914 links across 220 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 53 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Cribl36 answers · 81 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Chronosphere29 answers · 68 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GitHub27 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · OpenTelemetry22 answers · 44 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Apica18 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Splunk15 answers · 27 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Coralogix14 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Grafana11 answers · 23 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Mezmo11 answers · 12 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Honeycomb11 answers · 11 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Parseable10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best telemetry pipeline”, “telemetry pipeline”, “telemetry pipelines”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Cribl Stream cribl.io40%1242601517,616$19203
OpenTelemetry Collector opentelemetry.io28%1531,3005624,504
Datadog datadoghq.com9%59074,0003,541159,408$6331201
Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline chronosphere.io4%332004,73205
Coralogix coralogix.com4%1164,4008310,540$2827
groundcover groundcover.com4%2914,8001,3289,109$79224
Grafana grafana.com
Grafana Cloud 2%, Grafana Loki 0%, Grafana Alloy 0%, Grafana 0% and 1 more
2%27740,5002,62784,5201169
ClickHouse Cloud clickhouse.com2%1681,0001543,80547
Datadog parent site
Datadog Observability Pipelines 2%
2%1174,0003,541
SigNoz signoz.io2%1792,400527,2441

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (chronosphere.io, cribl.io, grafana.com, mezmo.com). The first result for “best telemetry pipeline” is schabell.org.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best telemetry pipeline for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which observability pipeline tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade telemetry pipelines and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best telemetry pipeline for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a telemetry pipeline. What should we look at?”Negative“Which telemetry pipelines should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Datadog
Eight alternativesDynatrace, ELK Stack, Google BigQuery, Grafana, Grafana Loki, New Relic, Prometheus, Snowflake
DatadogHeld
Three alternativesCribl Stream, Dynatrace, Splunk Observability Cloud
Cribl Stream
Four alternativesAxoflow, Bindplane, Splunk Observability Cloud, VirtualMetric DataStream
no first choiceno first choicenothing named
GPT-5.4 minino first choiceDatadog Observability PipelinesChanged
Three alternativesElastic Observability, Grafana, OpenTelemetry Collector
OpenTelemetry Collector
Three alternativesDatadog Observability Pipelines, Grafana Alloy, Splunk Observability Cloud
OpenTelemetry Collector
Eleven alternativesApache Flink, Apache Kafka, Apache Pulsar, Jaeger, Kafka Streams, Mimir, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prometheus-compatible backend, Redpanda, Tempo, Thanos
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCribl Stream
Thirteen alternativesAmazon S3, Apache Kafka, ClickHouse Cloud, Datadog, Fluentbit, Google Cloud Storage, Grafana Cloud, Honeycomb, OpenTelemetry Collector, Parseable, Redpanda, Vector, eBPF
Cribl StreamHeld
Three alternativesFluent Bit, OpenTelemetry Collector, Vector
Cribl Stream
Five alternativesFluent Bit, Fluentd, Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline, OpenTelemetry Collector, Vector
Cribl Stream, OpenTelemetry Collector
Seven alternativesClickHouse Cloud, Grafana Cloud, Grafana Loki, Grafana Mimir, Tempo, Vector, VictoriaMetrics
against: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic
no first choiceagainst: Apache Cassandra-backed tracing, Datadog, Elasticsearch, Kibana, Logstash, New Relic, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prometheus, Sumo Logic
Perplexity SonarCribl Stream, OpenTelemetry Collector
Four alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Datadog, Elastic Observability, Twilio Segment
DatadogChanged
Three alternativesDynatrace, Grafana Cloud, Splunk Observability Cloud
Cribl Stream
Nine alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Datadog, Dynatrace, Elastic Observability, Fluent Bit, Grafana Stack, OpenTelemetry Collector, Splunk Observability Cloud, Vector
Coralogix
Two alternativesCribl Stream, OpenTelemetry Collector
against: Datadog
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.20OpenTelemetry Collector
Two alternativesFluent Bit, Vector
against: Fluentd, Logstash
Cribl StreamChanged
Three alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Datadog Observability Pipelines, Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline
against: Elastic Observability, Fluent Bit, Splunk Observability Cloud, Vector
Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Cribl Stream
Three alternativesFluent Bit, OpenTelemetry Collector, Vector
against: Datadog, Dynatrace, Splunk Observability Cloud
OpenTelemetry Collector
Seven alternativesClickHouse Cloud, Fluent Bit, Grafana LGTM Stack, Grafana Loki, OpenObserve, Prometheus, Vector
against: Datadog, New Relic, Splunk Observability Cloud
Cribl Stream
Three alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Edge Delta, OpenTelemetry Collector
against: Datadog Observability Pipelines, Elastic Observability
against: Amazon EventBridge, Cribl Stream, DataBahn, Datadog Observability Pipelines, Edge Delta's Intelligent Telemetry Pipelines, New Relic, Splunk Ingest Actions, observIQ's Bindplane
Mistral SmallCribl Stream
Two alternativesMezmo Telemetry Pipeline, OpenTelemetry Collector
against: Twilio Segment
Cribl StreamHeld
Two alternativesDatadog, Dynatrace
Cribl Stream
Two alternativesDatadog Observability Pipelines, OpenTelemetry Collector
against: Elastic Observability, Splunk Observability Cloud
Cribl Stream, OpenTelemetry Collector
Two alternativesCoralogix, Grafana
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashCribl Stream
Two alternativesOpenTelemetry Collector, Vector
Cribl StreamHeld
Three alternativesDatadog Observability Pipelines, Splunk Edge Processor, Splunk Observability Cloud
against: Logstash
OpenTelemetry Collector
Seven alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Cribl Stream, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Grafana Alloy, Grafana Stack, Vector
Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline
Six alternativesGrafana Loki, Grafana Mimir, OpenTelemetry Collector, Prometheus, Tempo, VictoriaMetrics
against: Cribl Stream, Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic
Cribl Stream
Two alternativesApica, Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline
against: Fluentd
Llama 4 MaverickCribl Stream
Two alternativesMezmo Telemetry Pipeline, OpenTelemetry Collector
Cribl StreamHeld
Six alternativesDataBahn, Datadog, Dynatrace, IBM Instana, OpenTelemetry Collector, Splunk Observability Cloud
Cribl Stream
One alternativeOpenTelemetry Collector
Last9
Three alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Elastic Observability, Grafana Cloud
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashSigNoz
Four alternativesDatadog, Grafana Stack, New Relic, OpenTelemetry Collector
against: Dynatrace
DatadogChanged
Six alternativesGrafana Loki, OpenTelemetry Collector, Palo Alto Networks Cortex Cloud, Prometheus, SigNoz, VictoriaMetrics
Cribl Stream
Four alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Datadog Observability Pipelines, OpenTelemetry Collector, Vector
ClickHouse Cloud
Seven alternativesApache Kafka, Grafana Loki, Moesif, OpenTelemetry Collector, PostHog, Sumo Logic, Thanos
against: Datadog, Elasticsearch, Splunk Observability Cloud
no first choiceagainst: AWS Lambda, Azure Functions, Elasticsearch
Kimi K2OpenTelemetry Collector
Three alternativesCribl Stream, Honeycomb Pipeline Manager, Vector
Cribl StreamChanged
One alternativeChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline
OpenTelemetry Collector
Five alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Cribl Stream, Fluent Bit, Grafana Alloy, Vector
against: Fluentd
Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline
Four alternativesCribl Stream, Fluent Bit, OpenObserve, OpenTelemetry Collector
against: Elasticsearch
Cribl Stream
Four alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Fluent Bit, OpenTelemetry Collector, Vector
against: Amazon CloudWatch Logs, Datadog, Fluentd, OpenTelemetry Collector, Splunk Observability Cloud
GLM 4.7 FlashXOpenTelemetry Collector
Six alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Cribl Stream, Datadog, Grafana Cloud, New Relic, Splunk Observability Cloud
Cribl StreamChanged
Five alternativesDatadog, Grafana, Grafana Cloud, OpenTelemetry Collector, Splunk Observability Cloud
Cribl Stream
Two alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, OpenTelemetry Collector
against: Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic
Grafana Cloud, groundcover
One alternativeLast9
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5OpenTelemetry Collector
Two alternativesCribl Stream, Vector
no first choiceChangedCribl Stream
Five alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Edge Delta, Fluent Bit, OpenTelemetry Collector, Splunk OpenTelemetry Collector
Coralogix, OpenTelemetry Collectoragainst: Honeycomb, Splunk Observability Cloudno first choiceagainst: Apache Kafka
GPT-6 LunaOpenTelemetry Collector
One alternativeGrafana Alloy
Cribl StreamChanged
One alternativeOpenTelemetry Collector
against: Bindplane
Cribl Stream
Six alternativesBindplane, Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Edge Delta, Grafana Alloy, Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline, OpenTelemetry Collector
OpenTelemetry Collector
Two alternativesCribl Stream, Grafana Alloy
against: Honeycomb
no first choiceagainst: Fluentd, Promtail
Muse Glimmer 30BOpenTelemetry Collector
Six alternativesChronosphere Telemetry Pipeline, Datadog, Fluent Bit, Fluentd, Grafana Cloud, Vector
Cribl StreamChanged
Three alternativesBindplane, Datadog, Dynatrace
Cribl Stream
Three alternativesFluent Bit, OpenTelemetry Collector, Vector
groundcover
Two alternativesCoralogix, OpenTelemetry Collector
no first choiceagainst: Datadog, Dynatrace, Logstash, Splunk Observability Cloud
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:39no011 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 19:16yes56 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:34yes625 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:17yes106 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:38yes511 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:05yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:29yes2330 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:45yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 18:03no034 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:26yes1929 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:54yes2432 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:22yes522 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:26yes516 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 19:42yes1523 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 13:57yes1710 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 17:57yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 18:12yes1023 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:17yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:00yes911 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:42yes159 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:48yes2323 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 18:03yes54 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:47no030 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:34yes2025 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:06yes1525 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:20no078 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:56yes413 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:53yes2225 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:53yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:24yes98 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:34no023 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:07yes108 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:16yes1320 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:12yes1311 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 17:32yes2456 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:27yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:35yes2063 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 18:35yes2538 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:43yes2564 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:55yes2395 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:07yes624 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:28yes2539 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:24yes1910 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:56no04 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:02no017 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:11yes105 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:55yes1413 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:14yes57 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:17yes2426 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:16yes54 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 17:37no031 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 19:45yes1449 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:37yes2535 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:37yes533 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:33yes425 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:05yes1932 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:45yes1814 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:53no07 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:52no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:24yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:37yes1017 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:57no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:33yes2564 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:56yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:21no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:57yes2438 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:03yes1552 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:45no031 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:23yes519 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:18yes1526 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:36yes1813 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:38no06 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:38no019 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:46yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:28yes1515 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:58yes526 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:33yes2539 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:46yes104 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:30no038 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:58yes2468 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:51yes15100 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:47yes559 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:27yes614 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:11yes2332 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Chronosphere read as Chronosphere Telemetry Pipeline
Cribl read as Cribl Stream
Elastic read as Elastic Observability
Elastic (with its ingest pipelines) read as Elastic Observability
Mezmo read as Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline
Mezmo (LogDNA) read as Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline
Mezmo (formerly LogDNA) read as Mezmo Telemetry Pipeline
OpenTelemetry read as OpenTelemetry Collector
OpenTelemetry (OTel) read as OpenTelemetry Collector
OpenTelemetry (OTel) Collector read as OpenTelemetry Collector
Splunk read as Splunk Observability Cloud
Splunk Cloud read as Splunk Observability Cloud
Splunk Enterprise read as Splunk Observability Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Amazon EventBridge
Apache Cassandra-backed tracing
Axoflow
Azure Functions
Confluent Kafka
Edge Delta's Intelligent Telemetry Pipelines
Honeycomb Pipeline Manager
Hydra
Kinesis Analytics
OpenTelemetry (OTel) collectors
OpenTelemetry Agent
OpenTelemetry Collector Gateways
Prometheus-compatible backend
Quickwit
SNS/SQS
Searchable
Splunk Edge Processor
Splunk Ingest Actions
Splunk OpenTelemetry Collector
VirtualMetric DataStream
eBPF
managed OpenSearch/Elastic on S3
observIQ's Bindplane
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← SaaS managementUEM →