Dynatrace is an observability platform used for application performance monitoring, infrastructure monitoring, log management and error and crash monitoring · dynatrace.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
New Relic is first at 60%.
New Relic is first at 61%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Datadog APM at 15%.
“For organizations with cloud-native environments and container orchestration, tools like Datadog, Prometheus, or Dynatrace are excellent choices.”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Pick Dynatrace if you value the most mature automated root‑cause analysis and want full‑stack observability with AI”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · first choice
“Dynatrace or Datadog | Deep code-level tracing and automatic root-cause pinpointing across cloud environments.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Do you need exact root causes or probable ones? → *Dynatrace* (causal AI). Most others give probabilities.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“Avoid: Writing code that sends telemetry directly to third-party APIs (e.g., sending logs straight to Splunk Cloud, Datadog, or Dynatrace APIs)”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Do not use heavy Application Performance Monitoring suites (like Dynatrace or AppDynamics) solely for error tracking.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Legacy vendor-specific agents (New Relic, AppDynamics, Dynatrace traditional agents) | Closed data formats”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“Often recommended to be avoided unless you are a large enterprise with a dedicated SRE team.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Dynatrace, over the 779 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 413 | 62 | Compare → | |
| 395 | 83 | View → | |
| 158 | 25 | View → | |
| 158 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 149 | 0 | View → | |
| 137 | 5 | View → | |
| 124 | 2 | View → | |
| 121 | 25 | Compare → | |
| 117 | 1 | View → | |
| 113 | 6 | View → |
What the models named instead of Dynatrace →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Dynatrace's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 676 of the 779 answers that named Dynatrace and are not a share of its labels.
1,153 of the 1,355 domain citations in answers naming Dynatrace came from a third party's page. Ninety-one were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 14 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 13 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 20 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 20 | 36 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 19 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 18 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 14 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 27 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 23 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 13 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 14 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 1,870 | 65 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 424 | 20 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 168 | 20 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Case study | 131 | 19 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Blog | 98 | 39 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Conference or event | 54 | 10 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 34 | 4 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 23 | 6 | 2026-09-09 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on dynatrace.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page dynatrace.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.