Time series databases
Asked as “time series database”, and as “database for metrics and sensor data”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
64%
Clear leader
64TimescaleDB13InfluxDB11VictoriaMetrics13others
64% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 63% → 64%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.TimescaleDB held the lead, +1 point on 63%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
TimescaleDB62%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 57% → 62%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketTimescaleDB64%Clear leader▲+1Since October 2026: 63% → 64%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseTimescaleDB57%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 47% → 57%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
TimescaleDB62%Clear leader▲+5Since October 2026: 57% → 62%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketTimescaleDB64%Clear leader▲+1Since October 2026: 63% → 64%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseTimescaleDB57%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 47% → 57%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01TimescaleDB64%6%69endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 63% → 64%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.63% → 64%
TimescaleDB64%6%69endorsed leader▲+1Since October 2026: 63% → 64%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.63% → 64%02
InfluxDB13%25%76criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 13%
InfluxDB13%25%76criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 13%03
VictoriaMetrics11%4%57accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%
VictoriaMetrics11%4%57accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 8% → 11%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 11%04
QuestDB4%0%38accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
QuestDB4%0%38accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%05
Prometheus2%17%58accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Prometheus2%17%58accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10OpenTSDB0%53%15criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Amazon Timestream0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
06
ClickHouse Cloud0%2%50accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
ClickHouse Cloud0%2%50accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
TDengine0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
TDengine0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Thanos0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Thanos0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
One product takes 64% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
InfluxDB25%
19 of 76 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“avoid InfluxDB 3 Core (OSS) for production unless your use case genuinely fits within 72-hour retention and 5 databases” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Prometheus17%
10 of 58 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“Prometheus as a primary long-term, large-scale TSDB... be cautious if you need multi-year retention, high availability, or broad analytical queries.” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
OpenTSDB
53%
8 of 15 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Why avoid: Built on top of Hadoop and HBase, OpenTSDB requires a massive infrastructure footprint” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
KairosDB
100%
5 of 5 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Why avoid: An older Cassandra-backed time-series database that has largely been surpassed” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 749 links across 154 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 53 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · TigerData44 answers · 78 citations · 13 models
vendor site · InfluxData37 answers · 71 citations · 12 models
vendor site · GitHub36 answers · 92 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · QuestDB19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · SourceForge17 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · VictoriaMetrics13 answers · 24 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
vendor site · InfluxData12 answers · 17 citations · 6 models
vendor site · G212 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · VictoriaMetrics12 answers · 13 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Prometheus11 answers · 12 citations · 5 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
21 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 8 models
17 answers · 6 models
17 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 6 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best time series database”, “time series database”, “time series databases”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TimescaleDB tigerdata.com | 64% | 175 | 3,600 | 147 | 23,549 | $658 | 27 | 2 |
| InfluxDB influxdata.com InfluxDB 13%, InfluxData 0% | 13% | 177 | 4,400 | 350 | 46,684 | 44 | 3 | |
| VictoriaMetrics victoriametrics.com | 11% | 132 | 1,300 | 52 | 4,097 | 0 | 6 | |
| QuestDB questdb.com | 4% | 106 | 880 | 6 | 14,289 | 2 | 4 | |
| PostgreSQL postgresql.org PostgreSQL with TimescaleDB 4% | 4% | 11 | 74,000 | 14,143 | 465,585 company | |||
| Prometheus prometheus.io | 2% | 280 | 246,000 | 11,819 | 22,996 | |||
| TimescaleDB, now marketed as Tiger Cloud / TigerData | 2% | |||||||
| ClickHouse Cloud clickhouse.com | 0% | 168 | 1,000 | 15 | 43,805 | 47 | ||
| TDengine tdengine.com | 0% | 33 | 390 | 4 | 1,592 | 2 | 5 | |
| Amazon parent site Amazon Timestream 0% | 0% | 54 | 151,000,000 | 1,380,939 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (db-engines.com, influxdata.com, questdb.com, tigerdata.com, victoriametrics.com). The first result for “best time series database” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best time series database for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which database for metrics and sensor data would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top time series databases and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best time series database for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a time series database. What should we look at?”Negative“Which time series databases should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceTimescaleDBChangedInfluxDBInfluxDB, TimescaleDBno first choiceagainst: ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, OpenTSDB, Prometheus, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetrics
Four alternatives
InfluxDB, QuestDB, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsThree alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsFive alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, QuestDB, TDengine, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsThree alternatives
Prometheus, QuestDB, VictoriaMetricsGPT-5.4 miniTimescaleDBInfluxDBChangedInfluxDB, TimescaleDBPrometheusno first choiceagainst: InfluxDB, Prometheus
Four alternatives
Amazon Timestream, ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, TimescaleDBThree alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, QuestDBTwo alternatives
InfluxDB 3 Core, VictoriaMetricsGemini 3.5 FlashTimescaleDBagainst: FluxTimescaleDBHeldagainst: InfluxDBno first choiceagainst: kdb+TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsno first choiceagainst: Amazon DynamoDB, Apache Cassandra, Elasticsearch, InfluxDB, KairosDB, OpenSearch, OpenTSDB, Prometheus, ScyllaDB, TimescaleDB, Whisper / RRDtool
Four alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, QuestDB, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, VictoriaMetricsSix alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, Prometheus, QuestDB, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, QuestDBPerplexity SonarTimescaleDBTimescaleDBHeldTimescaleDBTimescaleDBagainst: InfluxDBno first choiceagainst: Graphite, InfluxDB, MySQL, OpenTSDB, PostgreSQL, Prometheus
Five alternatives
Amazon Timestream, ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, Prometheus, VictoriaMetricsFive alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, SQLite, TDengine, VictoriaMetricsFive alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, Prometheus, QuestDB, VictoriaMetricsFive alternatives
InfluxDB OSS, Prometheus, QuestDB, TDengine, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
PostgreSQL, PrometheusGrok 4.20TimescaleDBagainst: kdb+TimescaleDBHeldInfluxDBagainst: Apache CassandraTimescaleDBagainst: kdb+InfluxDBagainst: Amazon Timestream, Apache Cassandra, CrateDB, Elasticsearch, InfluxDB, PostgreSQL, Prometheus, RRDtool, Redis, Whisper
Three alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsFive alternatives
Amazon Timestream, Azure Data Explorer, ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, PrometheusEight alternatives
Amazon Timestream, Apache Druid, ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, QuestDB, TDengine, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsFive alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, QuestDB, TDengine, VictoriaMetricsFive alternatives
Apache Druid, ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsMistral SmallTimescaleDBInfluxDB, TimescaleDBChangedagainst: MongoDB with Time Series CollectionsInfluxDBTimescaleDBTimescaleDBagainst: Google BigQueryagainst: InfluxDB, MySQL, PostgreSQL
Three alternatives
Amazon Timestream, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsThree alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, ThanosFive alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, QuestDB, TDengine, TimescaleDBTwo alternatives
InfluxDB, QuestDBSix alternatives
Amazon Timestream, InfluxDB, M3DB, Prometheus, QuestDB, VictoriaMetricsDeepSeek V4 FlashTimescaleDBTimescaleDBHeldInfluxDBVictoriaMetricsagainst: InfluxDB, Timescale Cloudno first choiceagainst: InfluxDB, KX, Prometheusagainst: Graphite, InfluxDB, KairosDB, OpenTSDB, Prometheus
Three alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsSeven alternatives
Amazon Timestream, ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, QuestDB, TDengine, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
Prometheus, TimescaleDBFour alternatives
Apache IoTDB, TDengine, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsLlama 4 MaverickTimescaleDBno first choiceChangedno first choiceTimescaleDBno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
InfluxDB, QuestDB, VictoriaMetricsThree alternatives
InfluxDB, QuestDB, VictoriaMetricsQwen 3.7 FlashTimescaleDBTimescaleDBHeldagainst: MySQL, PostgreSQLno first choiceTimescaleDBagainst: InfluxDB OSSno first choiceagainst: CrateDB, Elasticsearch, InfluxDB, OpenTSDB, Prometheus, TimescaleDB, kdb+
Three alternatives
InfluxDB, Prometheus, QuestDBTwo alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDBFour alternatives
InfluxDB, Prometheus, QuestDB, TimescaleDBThree alternatives
Prometheus, TDengine, VictoriaMetricsSeven alternatives
Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, Prometheus, QuestDB, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsKimi K2InfluxDBTimescaleDBChangedInfluxDBVictoriaMetricsagainst: InfluxDB 3 CoreVictoriaMetricsagainst: Mimiragainst: AWS Timestream for LiveAnalytics, Blueflood, Heroic, InfluxDB 2.x / Flux, KairosDB, OpenTSDB, QuestDB Cloud
Two alternatives
TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsOne alternative
InfluxDBFive alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, QuestDB, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsOne alternative
TimescaleDBThree alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, Grafana Mimir, TimescaleDBGLM 4.7 FlashXTimescaleDBInfluxDBChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: Chronograf, InfluxDB, KairosDB, LinDB, OpenTSDB
Four alternatives
Amazon Timestream, Azure Data Explorer, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, TimescaleDBMiniMax M2.5TimescaleDBTimescaleDBHeldno first choiceQuestDB, TimescaleDBagainst: InfluxDBno first choiceagainst: Graphite, InfluxDB, OpenTSDB, TimescaleDB
Three alternatives
Amazon Timestream, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetricsTwo alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDBTwo alternatives
Apache IoTDB, VictoriaMetricsGPT-6 LunaTimescaleDBPostgreSQL with TimescaleDBChangedno first choicePostgreSQL with TimescaleDBno first choiceagainst: Amazon Timestream for LiveAnalytics, InfluxDBagainst: InfluxDB, InfluxDB 1.x or 2.x, Prometheus, VictoriaMetrics
Two alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDBThree alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, PrometheusSeven alternatives
Apache IoTDB, ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, Prometheus, QuestDB, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetricsOne alternative
VictoriaMetricsThree alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, Prometheus, QuestDBMuse Glimmer 30BTimescaleDB, now marketed as Tiger Cloud / TigerDataTimescaleDBChangedagainst: Prometheusno first choiceQuestDB, VictoriaMetricsno first choiceagainst: Amazon Timestream for LiveAnalytics, Chronix, Graphite, InfluxDB, KairosDB, OpenNMS Newts / Cassandra backend, TimescaleDB extension on PostgreSQL 17+, abhot – KairosDB fork
Two alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDBThree alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, InfluxDataSeven alternatives
ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, Prometheus, QuestDB, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetrics, kdb+Two alternatives
InfluxDB, TimescaleDBBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:18 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:57 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:26 | yes | 15 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:21 | yes | 20 | 63 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:22 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 15 | 47 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 10 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:09 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:43 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:27 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:44 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:23 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:08 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 21 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 14 | 43 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 5 | 51 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:12 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:21 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:19 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:22 | yes | 18 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:03 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:46 | yes | 15 | 57 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:59 | no | 0 | 108 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 15 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:37 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:14 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:36 | yes | 8 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:41 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 14 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:56 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:37 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 13 | 79 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:49 | yes | 9 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 2 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:08 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:05 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:10 | yes | 11 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:57 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:18 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 18:19 | no | 0 | 35 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 19 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:16 | no | 0 | 57 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:26 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:33 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:05 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:44 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:12 | yes | 23 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:53 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 25 | 149 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:59 | yes | 3 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:40 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
AWS Timestream read as Amazon Timestream
Unresolved, counted raw
AWS Timestream for LiveAnalytics
Blueflood
Chronix
Chronograf
GCP Memorystore
Hadoop
Heroic
InfluxDB 2.x / Flux
InfluxDB 3.x
InfluxDB IOx/3.0
IoTDB
LinDB
MongoDB with Time Series Collections
OpenNMS Newts / Cassandra backend
QuestDB Cloud (managed SaaS)
TimescaleDB extension on PostgreSQL 17+
TimescaleDB → Tiger Data
TimescaleDB, now marketed as Tiger Cloud / TigerData
Whisper (Graphite)
Whisper / RRDtool (Graphite ecosystem)
abhot – KairosDB fork
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.