Index › IT › Data platform › Time series DBs › InfluxDB vs Prometheus
Time series databases · November 2026 Edition

InfluxDB vs Prometheus

One of fourteen models named InfluxDB first on the direct prompt; zero named Prometheus. Both were named by all fourteen models and InfluxDB carries 76 labels and Prometheus 58, so the shares are not directly comparable.

InfluxDB

criticized challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Prometheus

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share13%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate25%17%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#5A position in a field of 10; printed, not drawn.
Labels7658A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, InfluxDB reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.TimescaleDB was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. TimescaleDB vs InfluxDB · TimescaleDB vs Prometheus · InfluxDB vs VictoriaMetrics

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the time series databases page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
InfluxDBFirst choices, of fourteen modelsPrometheus
Direct10
Paraphrase301 against InfluxDB · 1 against Prometheus
Comparative60
Budget-constrained113 against InfluxDB
Scale-constrained102 against InfluxDB · 1 against Prometheus
Negative0112 against InfluxDB · 8 against Prometheus
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, InfluxDB and Prometheus were named in the same answer 142 times, of the 222 answers naming InfluxDB and the 351 naming Prometheus. In those answers Prometheus took the first choice two times and InfluxDB thirty-three.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where InfluxDB and Prometheus stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
InfluxDB Prometheus first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, InfluxDB on the left and Prometheus on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where InfluxDB and Prometheus stood in it.

InfluxDB first, Prometheus not the choice

1 of 14 modelsPrometheus was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Kimi K2InfluxDB alternatives: TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetrics

Neither was the first choice, one was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice alternatives: InfluxDB, QuestDB, TimescaleDB, VictoriaMetrics
GPT-5.4 miniTimescaleDB alternatives: Amazon Timestream, ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetrics
Gemini 3.5 FlashTimescaleDB alternatives: ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, QuestDB, VictoriaMetrics
Perplexity SonarTimescaleDB alternatives: Amazon Timestream, ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, Prometheus, VictoriaMetrics
Grok 4.20TimescaleDB alternatives: ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetrics
Mistral SmallTimescaleDB alternatives: Amazon Timestream, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetrics
DeepSeek V4 FlashTimescaleDB alternatives: ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetrics
Llama 4 MaverickTimescaleDB alternatives: InfluxDB, QuestDB, VictoriaMetrics
Qwen 3.7 FlashTimescaleDB alternatives: InfluxDB, Prometheus, QuestDB
GLM 4.7 FlashXTimescaleDB alternatives: Amazon Timestream, Azure Data Explorer, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetrics
MiniMax M2.5TimescaleDB alternatives: Amazon Timestream, InfluxDB, VictoriaMetrics
GPT-6 LunaTimescaleDB alternatives: ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB
Muse Glimmer 30BTimescaleDB, now marketed as Tiger Cloud / TigerData alternatives: ClickHouse Cloud, InfluxDB

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
InfluxDB leads by fourteen points.
InfluxDB16%#2 of 8
Prometheus2%#4 of 8
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
InfluxDB leads by eleven points.
InfluxDB13%#2 of 10
Prometheus2%#5 of 10
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
InfluxDB leads by fourteen points.
InfluxDB14%#2 of 12
Prometheus0%#11 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about InfluxDB

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“avoid InfluxDB 3 Core (OSS) for production unless your use case genuinely fits within 72-hour retention and 5 databases” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“When to avoid: If stability, easy upgrades, or long-term maintenance are priorities. Many teams are migrating away” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“InfluxDB 3 is a different generation from v1/v2, and its Core edition has documented query-range limitations that may matter for historical analytics.” GPT-6 Luna · scale prompt · soft negative
“InfluxDB is considered the best overall reference point for broad time series workloads spanning metrics, IoT, and real-time analytics with strong ingest.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“TimescaleDB (if using PostgreSQL) or InfluxDB Open Source tend to offer the best balance of features, performance, and cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with InfluxDB if you want a proven, well-supported solution with a managed cloud option and extensive integrations.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Prometheus

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Prometheus as a primary long-term, large-scale TSDB... be cautious if you need multi-year retention, high availability, or broad analytical queries.” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Using local Prometheus TSDB disk storage to retain multi-year historical metrics will eventually lead to slow queries and OOM crashes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“the best choice is usually Prometheus if your main workload is monitoring/metrics, because it's free, open source” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose established options like Prometheus, VictoriaMetrics, or ClickHouse for most use cases” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.