Website and synthetic monitoring for enterprise buyers
Asked as “uptime monitoring tool”, and as “synthetic and digital experience monitoring”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
25%
Contested · Dynatrace 23%
25Datadog Synthetic Monitoring23Dynatrace18UptimeRobot35others
25% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring (25%) replaces Dynatrace (24% then, 23% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Datadog Synthetic Monitoring leads at 25%, replacing Dynatrace, which led at 24% and stands at 23% now: 2 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
UptimeRobot41%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 45% → 41%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketUptimeRobot31%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 24% → 31%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseDatadog Synthetic Monitoring25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring (25%) replaces Dynatrace (24% then, 23% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This page
UptimeRobot41%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 45% → 41%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketUptimeRobot31%Contested▲+7Since October 2026: 24% → 31%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseDatadog Synthetic Monitoring25%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring (25%) replaces Dynatrace (24% then, 23% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Datadog Synthetic Monitoring25%24%63accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 18% → 25%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 25%
02
Dynatrace23%9%43accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 24% → 23%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 23%
Dynatrace23%9%43accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 24% → 23%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.24% → 23%03UptimeRobot18%26%39criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 16% → 18%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 18%
UptimeRobot18%26%39criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 16% → 18%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.16% → 18%04
Uptime.com12%0%32accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 18% → 12%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 12%
Uptime.com12%0%32accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 18% → 12%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 12%05
Catchpoint4%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%
Catchpoint4%0%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 4% → 4%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 4%06
Better Stack2%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Better Stack2%17%18accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
Zabbix2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Zabbix2%17%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
StatusCake2%50%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
StatusCake2%50%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
Pingdom0%33%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Pingdom0%33%30criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
New Relic Synthetics0%17%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
New Relic Synthetics0%17%30accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%14
Uptrends0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Uptrends0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Site24x70%10%29accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Site24x70%10%29accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
LogicMonitor0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
LogicMonitor0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Checkly0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Checkly0%0%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
UptimeRobot vs Site24x7UptimeRobot vs New Relic SyntheticsUptimeRobot vs Uptime KumaUptimeRobot vs PingdomBetter Stack vs Datadog Synthetic MonitoringBetter Stack vs ChecklyBetter Stack vs Site24x7Better Stack vs New Relic SyntheticsBetter Stack vs Uptime KumaBetter Stack vs PingdomDatadog Synthetic Monitoring vs ChecklyDatadog Synthetic Monitoring vs Site24x7Datadog Synthetic Monitoring vs New Relic SyntheticsDatadog Synthetic Monitoring vs Uptime KumaDatadog Synthetic Monitoring vs PingdomCheckly vs Site24x7Checkly vs New Relic SyntheticsCheckly vs Uptime KumaCheckly vs PingdomSite24x7 vs New Relic SyntheticsSite24x7 vs Uptime KumaSite24x7 vs PingdomNew Relic Synthetics vs Uptime KumaNew Relic Synthetics vs PingdomUptime Kuma vs Pingdom
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
D01
02030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Datadog Synthetic Monitoring25%
02Dynatrace23%
Dynatrace23%03UptimeRobot18%
UptimeRobot18%04Uptime.com12%
Uptime.com12%05Catchpoint4%
Catchpoint4%06Better Stack2%
Better Stack2%07Zabbix2%
Zabbix2%08StatusCake2%
StatusCake2%09Site24x70%
Site24x70%10New Relic Synthetics0%
New Relic Synthetics0%11LogicMonitor0%
LogicMonitor0%12Checkly0%
Checkly0%13Pingdom0%
Pingdom0%14Uptrends0%
Uptrends0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
UptimeRobot26%
10 of 39 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“UptimeRobot, which lacks RUM (Real User Monitoring), transaction monitoring, and deep performance data, are insufficient for complex enterprise needs.” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring
24%
15 of 63 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid usage-based tools like Datadog Synthetic Monitoring or Pingdom if check volume or users could spike costs unpredictably.” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Pingdom33%
10 of 30 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid usage-based tools like Datadog Synthetic Monitoring or Pingdom” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
StatusCake50%
5 of 10 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“StatusCake doesn't include any user monitoring features... its testing limitations and lack of features like real-user testing will be too restricting” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 915 links across 277 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 16 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · UptimeRobot40 answers · 80 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Motadata30 answers · 35 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G226 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Hyperping23 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Site24x721 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · CubeAPM19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Uptime.com18 answers · 26 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 14 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Dynatrace12 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
12 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · ManageEngine12 answers · 12 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
28 answers · 12 models
19 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 9 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 6 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best uptime monitoring tool”, “uptime monitoring tool”, “website monitoring tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Datadog parent site Datadog Synthetic Monitoring 25% | 25% | 124 | 74,000 | 3,541 | |||
| Dynatrace dynatrace.com | 23% | 676 | 22,200 | 1,106 | 62,738 | $3,941 | 120 |
| UptimeRobot uptimerobot.com | 18% | 158 | 6,600 | 49 | 287,442 | 28 | |
| Uptime.com uptime.com | 12% | 57 | 110 | 2 | 50,059 | $42 | 12 |
| Catchpoint catchpoint.com | 4% | 23 | 1,000 | 25 | 44,364 | ||
| Cisco parent site Cisco ThousandEyes 4% | 4% | 21 | 165,000 | 48,352 | |||
| Better Stack betterstack.com | 2% | 311 | 1,600 | 1,017 | 41,811 | 119 | |
| Zabbix zabbix.com | 2% | 313 | 12,100 | 992 | 18,850 | 3 | |
| Nexthink nexthink.com | 2% | 11 | 7,329 | 22 | |||
| Hyperping hyperping.com | 2% | 25 | 140 | 0 | 67,358 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (manageengine.com, site24x7.com). The first result for “best uptime monitoring tool” is greta.sh.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best uptime monitoring tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which synthetic and digital experience monitoring would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade website monitoring tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best uptime monitoring tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an uptime monitoring tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which website monitoring tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Datadog Synthetic MonitoringDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceChangedDatadog Synthetic MonitoringZabbixagainst: LogicMonitorno first choiceagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, StatusCake, UptimeRobot, Zabbix
Four alternatives
Dynatrace, Pingdom, Site24x7, Uptime.comTwo alternatives
Catchpoint, ThousandEyesFour alternatives
Dynatrace, Pingdom, Site24x7, Uptime.comOne alternative
ManageEngine OpManagerGPT-5.4 miniDatadog Synthetic MonitoringDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceChangedDatadog Synthetic MonitoringUptimeRobotagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoringno first choiceagainst: New Relic Synthetics, StatusCake
Two alternatives
Uptime.com, UptimeRobotThree alternatives
Catchpoint, Splunk Observability Cloud, ThousandEyesFour alternatives
New Relic Synthetics, Pingdom, Site24x7, Uptime.comOne alternative
PingdomGemini 3.5 FlashDatadog Synthetic MonitoringCisco ThousandEyesChangedDatadog Synthetic MonitoringPrometheus + Grafanaagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, PagerDutyCatchpointagainst: Freshping, Nagios, StatusCake, Uptime Kuma, UptimeRobot, Zabbix
Four alternatives
Better Stack, Catchpoint, Uptime Kuma, Uptime.comFour alternatives
Catchpoint, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace, NexthinkFour alternatives
Catchpoint, Cisco AppDynamics, Dynatrace, New Relic SyntheticsThree alternatives
Catchpoint, OneUptime, UptrendsSix alternatives
Better Stack, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace, New Relic Synthetics, Pingdom, ThousandEyesPerplexity SonarDatadog Synthetic MonitoringDynatraceChangedDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceHyperpingagainst: Better Stackno first choiceagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace, LogRocket, Pingdom, Plerdy, Raygun, Splunk Observability Cloud, UptimeRobot
Four alternatives
Better Stack, Dynatrace, Uptime.com, UptrendsSix alternatives
Catchpoint, ControlUp, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Nexthink, Riverbed Aternity, ThousandEyesSix alternatives
Checkly, New Relic Synthetics, Pingdom, Site24x7, Uptime.com, UptrendsOne alternative
UptimeRobotGrok 4.20Datadog Synthetic Monitoringagainst: PingdomDynatraceChangedagainst: Grafana Synthetics, PingdomDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceUptimeRobotagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace, New Relic Synthetics, Pingdomno first choiceagainst: Google Analytics, Hotjar, UptimeRobot
Three alternatives
Dynatrace, New Relic Synthetics, Site24x7Three alternatives
Catchpoint, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic SyntheticsFive alternatives
IBM Instana, LogicMonitor, New Relic Synthetics, Site24x7, SolarWinds ObservabilityFour alternatives
Better Stack, CubeAPM, ManageEngine OpManager, Uptime.comMistral SmallDynatraceDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceChangedno first choiceUptimeRobotno first choiceagainst: AppDynamics, New Relic Browser, Pingdom, Uptrends
Two alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, PingdomThree alternatives
Grafana Cloud Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic Synthetics, ThousandEyesTwo alternatives
CubeAPM, ManageEngine OpManagerDeepSeek V4 FlashDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, Uptime.comagainst: PingdomDynatraceChangedno first choiceUptime.comagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace, New Relic Syntheticsno first choiceagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic Browser, Site24x7, SolarWinds Pingdom, StatusCake, UptimeRobot
Two alternatives
Better Stack, UptimeRobotFour alternatives
Cisco ThousandEyes, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Nexthink, Riverbed AternityNine alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dotcom-Monitor, Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, New Relic Synthetics, Pingdom, Site24x7, Uptime.com, ZabbixOne alternative
UptimeRobotLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceDynatraceChangedno first choiceUptimeRobotno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, LogicMonitor, ThousandEyesTwo alternatives
CubeAPM, Motadata ObserveOpsQwen 3.7 FlashDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, Uptime.comDynatraceChangedDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceStatusCakeagainst: Amazon CloudWatch, Datadog Synthetic Monitoringno first choiceagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dotcom-Monitor, PagerDuty, SiteGuru, UptimeRobot, Uptrends
Three alternatives
New Relic Synthetics, Pingdom, Site24x7Five alternatives
Catchpoint, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Lakeside, Riverbed Aternity, ThousandEyesFive alternatives
Elastic Observability, LogicMonitor, New Relic Synthetics, Site24x7, Splunk Observability CloudSeven alternatives
Atlassian Statuspage, Dynatrace, Grafana Cloud Synthetic Monitoring, Hetrix Tools, Prometheus, Site24x7, ZabbixKimi K2Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceDynatraceChangedDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceUptime.comagainst: Better Stack, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, OneUptime, Pingdom, SolarWindsUptime.com, UptimeRobotagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic Syntheticsagainst: Pingdom, UptimeRobot
Five alternatives
Better Stack, Hyperping, Site24x7, Uptime.com, UptimeRobotThree alternatives
Catchpoint, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, NexthinkFive alternatives
AppDynamics, New Relic Synthetics, Site24x7, SolarWinds, Uptime.comTwo alternatives
StatusCake, UptimeRobotOne alternative
PingdomGLM 4.7 FlashXBetter StackCisco ThousandEyes, Datadog Synthetic MonitoringChangedDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic SyntheticsUptimeRobotagainst: Honeybadgerno first choiceagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, DebugBear, Dynatrace, Pingdom, Site24x7, UptimeRobot
Four alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Site24x7, Uptime.com, UptimeRobotOne alternative
Dynatrace Unified PlatformFive alternatives
Dynatrace, LogicMonitor, Pingdom, Site24x7, ZabbixTwo alternatives
OneUptime, Uptime.comMiniMax M2.5Uptime.com, UptimeRobotDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace Synthetics, Lakeside Software, NexthinkChangedDynatraceUptimeRobotagainst: Better Stack, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic Synthetics, PagerDutyUptime.comagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoringagainst: DebugBear
Four alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, ManageEngine OpManager, OneUptime, Site24x7Four alternatives
1E, Catchpoint, ControlUp, ThousandEyesSix alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic Synthetics, Site24x7, StatusCake, Uptrends, ZabbixThree alternatives
Better Stack, OneUptime, Site24x7GPT-6 LunaCatchpointCisco ThousandEyes Endpoint ExperienceChangedno first choiceUptimeRobotno first choiceagainst: Pingdom, StatusCake, Uptime Kuma, UptimeRobot
One alternative
Datadog Synthetic MonitoringThree alternatives
ControlUp, Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceOne alternative
PingdomOne alternative
PingdomMuse Glimmer 30BDatadog Synthetic Monitoring, DynatraceDynatraceChangedno first choiceUptimeRobotagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoringno first choiceagainst: Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace UEM, New Relic Browser, Site24x7, SolarWinds, UptimeRobot
Four alternatives
Better Stack, New Relic Synthetics, Site24x7, Uptime.comThree alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, New Relic Synthetics, ThousandEyes Digital Experience MonitoringSeven alternatives
Datadog Synthetic Monitoring, Dynatrace, New Relic Synthetics, Pingdom, Site24x7, Uptime.com, UptimeRobotTwo alternatives
NodePing, Uptime.comBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:51 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 19:23 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 10 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:33 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:00 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:33 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 20 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 13 | 106 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:04 | yes | 9 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:35 | yes | 20 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 19:21 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 15 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:00 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:35 | yes | 25 | 44 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 23 | 54 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 15 | 46 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:49 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:32 | yes | 6 | 11 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:20 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:37 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:54 | yes | 8 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 25 | 69 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:41 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 18 | 30 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 8 | 58 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:01 | yes | 7 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 18:31 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:06 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:18 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:03 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 15 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 19:30 | no | 0 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:30 | yes | 19 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 19 | 77 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 67 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:32 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:36 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:43 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:26 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 23 | 49 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 10 | 51 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:02 | yes | 10 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:14 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 19:35 | yes | 20 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:39 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 25 | 51 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 19 | 42 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Datadog read as Datadog Synthetic Monitoring
Datadog Synthetics read as Datadog Synthetic Monitoring
Grafana Cloud read as Grafana Cloud Synthetic Monitoring
New Relic read as New Relic Synthetics
Splunk read as Splunk Observability Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Cisco ThousandEyes Endpoint Experience
Dynatrace Synthetics
Dynatrace UEM
Dynatrace Unified Platform
Grafana Synthetics
LogicMonitor IPM
NodePing
Odown
Plerdy
ThousandEyes Digital Experience Monitoring
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.