Robotic process automation for enterprise buyers
Asked as “RPA platform”, and as “robotic process automation software”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
74%
Clear leader
74UiPath23Microsoft Power Automate02Automation Anywhere
74% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+16Since October 2026: 58% → 74%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.UiPath held the lead, +16 points on 58%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate81%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 73% → 81%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power Automate63%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
UiPath74%Clear leader▲+16Since October 2026: 58% → 74%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This page
Microsoft Power Automate81%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 73% → 81%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power Automate63%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseUiPath74%Clear leader▲+16Since October 2026: 58% → 74%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01UiPath74%13%76endorsed leader▲+16Since October 2026: 58% → 74%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.58% → 74%
UiPath74%13%76endorsed leader▲+16Since October 2026: 58% → 74%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.58% → 74%02Microsoft Power Automate23%16%73accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 22% → 23%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 23%
Microsoft Power Automate23%16%73accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 22% → 23%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.22% → 23%03
Automation Anywhere2%19%70accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 2%
Automation Anywhere2%19%70accepted challenger▼−9Since October 2026: 11% → 2%, −9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Blue Prism0%50%22criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Blue Prism0%50%22criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%08
WorkFusion0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
WorkFusion0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07IBM Robotic Process Automation0%18%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
04SS&C Blue Prism0%12%40accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
06
Pega0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Pega0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05SAP Build Process Automation0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
Microsoft Power Automate vs UiPathMicrosoft Power Automate vs Automation AnywhereMicrosoft Power Automate vs Robocorp
Head-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
One product takes 74% of first choices here, so the chart would put eight markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.
What they warned about
Twelve of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Mistral Small changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Power Automate16%
12 of 73 labels negative · 12 of 14 models
“Microsoft Power Automate is an excellent, leader-tier platform, but *only* when fully backed by Premium enterprise cloud orchestration” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Automation Anywhere19%
13 of 70 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Some models explicitly advise avoiding it unless absolutely necessary.” Mistral Small, negative prompt
UiPath13%
10 of 76 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“UiPath remains the overall first-choice leader for attended+unattended bots at scale in 2026, but enterprise pricing is sales-quote only, so total cost is not predictable up front.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
Blue Prism50%
11 of 22 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Strongly cautioned against for most enterprises due to its complexity, high cost, and being "vastly over-engineered"” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 857 links across 243 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 47 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
41 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 22 citations · 8 models
21 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
publisher (Gane)21 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
vendor site · UiPath20 answers · 29 citations · 8 models
19 answers · 32 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Automation Anywhere18 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · LinkedIn16 answers · 28 citations · 5 models
15 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Blue Prism15 answers · 15 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G213 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 10 models
21 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 5 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best rpa platform”, “rpa platform”, “rpa platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UiPath uipath.com | 74% | 207 | 27,100 | 1,854 | 161,995 | $74 | 107 | 1 |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power Automate 23% | 23% | 323 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Automation Anywhere automationanywhere.com | 2% | 211 | 6,600 | 302 | 45,595 | 20 | 3 | |
| SS&C Blue Prism | 0% | 10 | ||||||
| SAP parent site SAP Build Process Automation 0%, SAP Intelligent RPA 0%, SAP® Build 0% | 0% | 16 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| Pega pega.com | 0% | 40 | 8,100 | 4,513 | 39,887 | 120 | ||
| Appian appian.com | 0% | 61 | 18,100 | 1,363 | 46,589 | 120 | ||
| ServiceNow servicenow.com | 0% | 61 | 135,000 | 13,451 | 689,216 | $673 | 101 | |
| IBM parent site IBM Robotic Process Automation 0% | 0% | 16 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| Pega Platform | 0% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (automationanywhere.com, blueprism.com, g2.com, gartner.com, uipath.com). The first result for “best rpa platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best RPA platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which robotic process automation software would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade RPA platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best RPA platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a RPA platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which RPA platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceUiPathChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathGPT-5.4 miniUiPathUiPathHeldUiPathUiPathagainst: Microsoft Power Automateno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Appian, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, ServiceNowTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
Automation AnywhereGemini 3.5 FlashUiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: UiPathUiPathagainst: ElectroNeek, HelpSystems, Microsoft Power Automate, NICE Systems, Pega, Rocketbot, SAP Build Process Automation, ServiceNow Native RPA, TagUI, Tungsten Automation RPA, WorkFusion
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere – Automation 360, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismSix alternatives
Appian, Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue Prism, Tungsten AutomationOne alternative
SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismPerplexity SonarUiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: IBM Robotic Process Automation, Microsoft Power Automate, NICE, Pega Robotic Automation, WorkFusion, viaSocket
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue PrismFive alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
UiPathGrok 4.20UiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Appian, Automation Anywhere, EdgeVerve, Kryon, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath, WorkFusion
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPathMistral SmallAutomation Anywhere, UiPathUiPathChangedUiPathUiPathagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prismno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
Two alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
Microsoft Power AutomateDeepSeek V4 FlashUiPathUiPathHeldagainst: Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue PrismUiPathagainst: Anypoint Composer, Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, EdgeVerve, Kofax, Make, NICE RPA, WorkFusion, Zapier
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
Automation AnywhereThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
UiPathTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateLlama 4 MaverickUiPathUiPathHeldno first choiceUiPathagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue PrismUiPathagainst: Blue Prism, Leapwork, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue PrismOne alternative
Microsoft Power AutomateTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, JinbaQwen 3.7 FlashUiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPathno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath, Workato, Zapier
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power AutomateTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismKimi K2UiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPathUiPathagainst: Microsoft Power Automateagainst: Automation Anywhere, IBM Robotic Process Automation, Kryon, SS&C Blue Prism, Softomotive, WorkFusion
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismSix alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Kofax, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism, Tungsten Automation, WorkFusionOne alternative
Automation AnywhereGLM 4.7 FlashXUiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Blue Prism
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathMiniMax M2.5UiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
Two alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismFour alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega Platform, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismTwo alternatives
Blue Prism, UiPathGPT-6 LunaUiPathUiPathHeldAutomation Anywhere, UiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft RPA, Nintex Kryon RPA 22.3.1
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateFour alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
UiPathMuse Glimmer 30BUiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPathno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Cyclone Robotics, EdgeVerve Systems, Hyland, Microsoft Power Automate, NICE, Nintex, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism WorkHQThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:05 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:45 | no | 0 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:48 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 19 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:52 | yes | 15 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:13 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:39 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:36 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:12 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:08 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:51 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:29 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:49 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:10 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 20 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 15 | 81 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:08 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:20 | yes | 3 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 6 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:33 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:56 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 23 | 43 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 19:08 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 24 | 59 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:07 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:20 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 19:30 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:06 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:35 | yes | 5 | 56 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:22 | yes | 20 | 43 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:31 | yes | 21 | 58 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:19 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 21 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 18:17 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:51 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:59 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:14 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:45 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 25 | 55 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:33 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:30 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:34 | yes | 15 | 63 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:37 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:05 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 28 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 18:45 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:06 | yes | 6 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 17 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:12 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 10 | 73 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:05 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:24 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:50 | yes | 25 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:33 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 20 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
IBM read as IBM Robotic Process Automation
IBM RPA read as IBM Robotic Process Automation
Microsoft read as Microsoft Power Automate
SAP read as SAP Build Process Automation
Unresolved, counted raw
Anypoint Composer
Automation Anywhere – Automation 360
Cyclone Robotics
EdgeVerve Systems
HelpSystems (Fortra / Automate)
MuleSoft RPA
Nintex Kryon RPA 22.3.1
Pega Platform
Reactive
SS&C
SS&C Blue Prism WorkHQ
ServiceNow Native RPA
Softomotive
Tungsten Automation RPA (formerly Kofax RPA / Kapow)
viaSocket
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.