Robotic process automation
Asked as “RPA platform”, and as “robotic process automation software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
63%
Clear leader
63Microsoft Power Automate28UiPath06UiPath Community Edition04others
63% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Microsoft Power Automate held the lead, +10 points on 53%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Microsoft Power Automate81%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 73% → 81%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power Automate63%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
UiPath74%Clear leader▲+16Since October 2026: 58% → 74%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →
Microsoft Power Automate81%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 73% → 81%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Power Automate63%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseUiPath74%Clear leader▲+16Since October 2026: 58% → 74%, +16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Microsoft Power Automate63%7%74endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.53% → 63%
Microsoft Power Automate63%7%74endorsed leader▲+10Since October 2026: 53% → 63%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.53% → 63%02UiPath28%11%71accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 33% → 28%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.33% → 28%
UiPath28%11%71accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 33% → 28%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.33% → 28%03
Automation Anywhere2%14%63accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Automation Anywhere2%14%63accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%04Robocorp2%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
07
WorkFusion0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
WorkFusion0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%06
Blue Prism0%36%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Blue Prism0%36%22criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%05SS&C Blue Prism0%29%21criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to head
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203R04
S05
0607Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative80%
Key
01Microsoft Power Automate63%
Microsoft Power Automate63%02UiPath28%
UiPath28%03Automation Anywhere2%
Automation Anywhere2%04Robocorp2%
05SS&C Blue Prism0%
06Blue Prism0%
Blue Prism0%07WorkFusion0%
WorkFusion0%What they warned about
Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Automation Anywhere14%
9 of 63 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“often criticized for being targeted at large enterprises and may not be suitable for smaller businesses” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Blue Prism36%
8 of 22 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“very high percentage of negative labels (94%) in small business contexts, with recommendations to avoid it” Mistral Small, negative prompt
UiPath11%
8 of 71 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Some AI models explicitly recommend avoiding UiPath unless you have a clear, large-scale need and budget” Mistral Small, negative prompt
SS&C Blue Prism
29%
6 of 21 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Blue Prism shows 4% first choice and 38% negative share... highest negative rate among the tools listed” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 742 links across 250 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 47 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
29 answers · 53 citations · 10 models
29 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 7 models
14 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 10 models
12 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G212 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Blue Prism12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Microsoft11 answers · 13 citations · 5 models
vendor site · UiPath11 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
15 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 10 models
9 answers · 7 models
8 answers · 8 models
8 answers · 6 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best rpa platform”, “rpa platform”, “rpa platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Power Automate 63% | 63% | 323 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| UiPath uipath.com UiPath 28%, UiPath Community Edition 6%, UiPath Basic Plan 0% | 33% | 207 | 27,100 | 1,854 | 161,995 | $74 | 107 | 1 |
| Automation Anywhere automationanywhere.com | 2% | 211 | 6,600 | 302 | 45,595 | 20 | 3 | |
| Robocorp | 2% | 1,300 | 4 | |||||
| SS&C Blue Prism | 0% | 10 | ||||||
| Workato workato.com | 0% | 80 | 14,800 | 405 | 38,042 | $20 | 120 | |
| SAP parent site SAP Build Process Automation 0% | 0% | 16 | 135,000 | 74,309 | ||||
| ThinkAutomation | 0% | |||||||
| Zapier zapier.com | 0% | 172 | 165,000 | 2,145 | 7,333,309 | $230 | 120 | |
| n8n n8n.io | 0% | 111 | 165,000 | 2,786 | 133,599 | 42 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 18 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (auxis.com, blueprism.com, g2.com, microsoft.com, uipath.com). The first result for “best rpa platform” is g2.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best RPA platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which robotic process automation software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top RPA platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best RPA platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a RPA platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which RPA platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceUiPathChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Community Editionno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Automation Anywhere, IBM Robotic Process Automation, Kissflow, NintexFive alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, Tungsten TotalAgility, WorkFusionTwo alternatives
Octoparse AI, RobocorpGPT-5.4 miniUiPathUiPathHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Automation Anywhereno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPath
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismFour alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
UiPath Community EditionGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power AutomateHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Contextor, OpenSpan, Pega RPA, Robocorp, SS&C Blue Prism, Selenium, Sema4.ai, WinAutomation, WorkFusion
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPath, WorkatoTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPath Automation CloudThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
OpenBots, Robocorp, UiPathThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPathPerplexity SonarMicrosoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power AutomateHeldUiPathagainst: Nintex RPAMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Laiye, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex, Pega, Rocketbot, WorkFusion
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPathTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathFive alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Make, UiPath, n8nGrok 4.20Microsoft Power Automateagainst: SS&C Blue Prism, ServiceNow, WorkFusionUiPathChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, ElectroNeek, Kofax, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, WorkFusion
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathFive alternatives
Automation Anywhere, ElectroNeek, Microsoft Power Automate, ThinkAutomation, ZapierThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Argos Labs, UiPath Community Edition, ZapierFour alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Fortra Automate, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPathMistral SmallUiPathMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPathChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power Automate, Robocorpno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, UiPath
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, NintexThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, ElectroNeek RPA and AI Platform, ThinkAutomationFive alternatives
Appian, Automation Anywhere, IBM Robotic Process Automation, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismOne alternative
UiPathDeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPathMicrosoft Power AutomateChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: UiPath Community EditionMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: SS&C Blue Prismagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, ElectroNeek, Kofax RPA, Nintex RPA
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, ElectroNeekTwo alternatives
ElectroNeek, UiPathThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismThree alternatives
Octoparse, Robocorp, ZapierTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathLlama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceChangedUiPathUiPathno first choiceagainst: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath
Three alternatives
Make, UiPath, ZapierTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power AutomateTwo alternatives
Argos Labs, Microsoft Power AutomateQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power AutomateHeldUiPathUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: Blue Prismagainst: Appian, Blue Prism, Kofax, UiPath
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Nintex, UiPathThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Kofax RPA, UiPathThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power AutomateTwo alternatives
Microsoft Power Automate, RobocorpTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathKimi K2Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power AutomateHeldUiPathMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Community Editionagainst: Make, Zapierno first choiceagainst: SS&C Blue Prism, TagUI, UiPath
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power AutomateThree alternatives
OpenRPA, Robot Framework, UiPath Basic PlanGLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPathUiPathChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: IBM Robotic Process Automation, Pega, SS&C Blue Prism
Two alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Zoho RPASix alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, ElectroNeek RPA & AI Platform, G1ANT, Microsoft Power Automate, akaBotThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismFour alternatives
OpenRPA, Robocorp, UiPath Basic Plan, UiPath Community EditionMiniMax M2.5UiPathMicrosoft Power AutomateChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPathagainst: Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, ElectroNeek, NICE Systems, Robot Framework, Robotic Workflows, TagUI
Three alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, ThinkAutomationTwo alternatives
Automation Anywhere, UiPathThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Blue Prism, Microsoft Power AutomateTwo alternatives
Robocorp, UiPathGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Power AutomateMicrosoft Power AutomateHeldagainst: Automation Anywhereno first choiceMicrosoft Power Automateno first choiceagainst: Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Intelligent RPA
One alternative
UiPathOne alternative
UiPathFive alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Build Process Automation, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPathOne alternative
UiPathMuse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Power Automateagainst: UiPathMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPathChangedUiPathMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath Community EditionAutomation Anywhere, UiPathagainst: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Robomotion, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath
Two alternatives
ElectroNeek RPA and AI Platform, RocketbotThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, ElectroNeek RPA and AI Platform, Zoho RPAThree alternatives
Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue PrismFour alternatives
Make, Robocorp, UiPath, ZapierTwo alternatives
Fortra Automate, Microsoft Power AutomateBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 19:28 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:30 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:18 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:41 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 5 | 38 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 19:04 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:09 | yes | 19 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:49 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:45 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:50 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:46 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 20 | 53 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:34 | yes | 14 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 18:24 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 18:30 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 19:11 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 18:05 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:58 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:04 | yes | 19 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:14 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 10 | 48 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:03 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:25 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:03 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:40 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:48 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 19:31 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 18 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:13 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:34 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 12 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 19:45 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:43 | yes | 2 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 18:47 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:50 | yes | 18 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:40 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:55 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:07 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 18:20 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 19:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:04 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 18:08 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 18:57 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 17:36 | no | 0 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:59 | yes | 1 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:30 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 18:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:13 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 19 | 56 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:04 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 14 | 119 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:34 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:13 | yes | 23 | 35 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Microsoft read as Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate Desktop read as Microsoft Power Automate
Unresolved, counted raw
AssistEdge RPA
Contextor
ElectroNeek RPA & AI Platform
JIFFY.ai RPA
OpenSpan
Oracle RPA
OutSystems
Power Platform
Robotic Workflows
Salesforce Flow
UiPath Automation Cloud
WinAutomation (Softomotive)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.