Ten of fourteen models named Microsoft Power Automate first on the direct prompt; five named UiPath. Both were named by all fourteen models and Microsoft Power Automate carries 74 labels and UiPath 71, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the robotic process automation page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Microsoft Power Automate and UiPath were named in the same answer 214 times, of the 356 answers naming Microsoft Power Automate and the 231 naming UiPath. In those answers UiPath took the first choice seventy-five times and Microsoft Power Automate seventy-nine.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“UI needs improvement; AI/ML features lag (per TechRadar)... avoid if ecosystem fit is poor.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Don’t assume it will be cheap just because your organization already uses Microsoft 365.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Power Automate for large, complex RPA estates... organizations can outgrow it” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Prefer "fusion" platforms that combine RPA + API automation + AI agents (e.g., Power Automate, modern UiPath with agents, ServiceNow, or Workato)” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · first choice
“focus your evaluation on established enterprise leaders with broad ecosystems: UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budgets, Power Automate Desktop and UiPath Community Edition are completely free options for commercial use.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Some AI models explicitly recommend avoiding UiPath unless you have a clear, large-scale need and budget” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if: You are a small team with limited budget → Stay away from UiPath” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-grade leaders such as UiPath continue to dominate overall RPA market share and enterprise rankings, but they are most often positioned for enterprise with dedicated automation teams.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · soft negative
“UiPath offers a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface with comprehensive toolset and strong community support, though it has high costs and a complex licensing model” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate are the top recommendations due to their scalability, strong feature sets, and integration capabilities” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“You want the market leader with proven scalability and AI | UiPath | Best overall feature set, strong community, and clear path to scale.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.