UiPath is a platform for business orchestration and automation, used for robotic process automation and agentic process automation · uipath.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Microsoft Power Automate is first at 81%.
Microsoft Power Automate is first at 63%. 5 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is Microsoft Power Automate at 23%.
“UiPath offers a user-friendly drag-and-drop interface with comprehensive toolset and strong community support, though it has high costs and a complex licensing model”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate are the top recommendations due to their scalability, strong feature sets, and integration capabilities”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“You want the market leader with proven scalability and AI | UiPath | Best overall feature set, strong community, and clear path to scale.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paraphrase question · first choice
“UiPath is considered the leading RPA software, known for its ability to handle complex automation solutions and its user-friendly interface.”Llama 4 Maverick · Comparative question · first choice
“Some AI models explicitly recommend avoiding UiPath unless you have a clear, large-scale need and budget”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Avoid if: You are a small team with limited budget → Stay away from UiPath”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Negative question · warning
“Enterprise-grade leaders such as UiPath continue to dominate overall RPA market share and enterprise rankings, but they are most often positioned for enterprise with dedicated automation teams.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · warning
“it's worth caution if you want the smoothest onboarding: recent reviews mention training and learning curve, implementation friction, and frequent/disruptive updates”GPT-5.4 mini · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as UiPath, over the 231 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 214 | 79 | Compare → | |
| 183 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 68 | 0 | View → | |
| 67 | 0 | View → | |
| 50 | 6 | View → | |
| 43 | 7 | View → | |
| 30 | 1 | Compare → | |
| 26 | 0 | View → | |
| 23 | 0 | View → | |
| 22 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of UiPath →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on UiPath's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 207 of the 231 answers that named UiPath and are not a share of its labels.
400 of the 493 domain citations in answers naming UiPath came from a third party's page. Fifty were to the publisher's own pages (the Gane Index), which the models cite like any other source; they are not counted as a third party.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 2,672 | 12 | 2026-11-12 | ITSM, Vector databases | |
| News or press | 1,023 | 28 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 513 | 14 | 2026-10-20 | ITSM | |
| Blog | 458 | 8 | 2026-09-16 | ITSM | |
| Case study | 355 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Report or ebook | 272 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | GRC | |
| Glossary or explainer | 28 | 0 | 2018-12-20 | ||
| Podcast or video | 9 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 3 | 2 | 2026-09-15 |
As the event pages on uipath.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page uipath.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.