Robotic process automation · November 2026 Edition
Automation Anywhere vs Robocorp
Zero of fourteen models named Automation Anywhere first on the direct prompt; zero named Robocorp. Automation Anywhere was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Robocorp by nine and Automation Anywhere carries 63 labels and Robocorp 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Robocorp
accepted challengerNamed in one category this edition.
First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate14%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#4A position in a field of 7; printed, not drawn.
Labels6311A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Automation Anywhere reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Power Automate was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere · Microsoft Power Automate vs Robocorp · UiPath vs Automation Anywhere
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the robotic process automation page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Automation AnywhereFirst choices, of fourteen modelsRobocorpDirect00
Paraphrase001 against Automation Anywhere
Comparative00
Budget-constrained011 against Automation Anywhere
Scale-constrained10
Negative107 against Automation Anywhere · 1 against Robocorp
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Automation Anywhere and Robocorp stood in it.
| Model | DirectRO | ParaphraseRO | ComparativeRO | Budget-constrainedRO | Scale-constrainedRO | NegativeRO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | RO | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | RO | | RO |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | RO | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | RO | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | RO | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | RO | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | RO | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | RO | | |
Automation AnywhereRO Robocorp first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Automation Anywhere on the left and Robocorp on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Automation Anywhere and Robocorp stood in it.
Neither was the first choice, one was named
10 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniUiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, SS&C Blue Prism
Gemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, UiPath, Workato
Perplexity SonarMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, SS&C Blue Prism, UiPath
Grok 4.20Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, UiPath
Mistral SmallUiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex
DeepSeek V4 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, ElectroNeek
Qwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Nintex, UiPath
Kimi K2Microsoft Power Automate alternatives: Automation Anywhere, UiPath
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Power Automate, UiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Zoho RPA
MiniMax M2.5UiPath alternatives: Automation Anywhere, Microsoft Power Automate, ThinkAutomation
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
Llama 4 MaverickMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: Make, UiPath, Zapier
GPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: UiPath
Muse Glimmer 30BMicrosoft Power Automate alternatives: ElectroNeek RPA and AI Platform, Rocketbot
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Robocorp leads by two points.
Robocorp2%#6 of 8
Automation Anywhere0%#7 of 8Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Automation Anywhere2%#3 of 7Robocorp2%#4 of 7
The full mid-market standing →Enterprise
Robocorp is not named for this buyer.
Automation Anywhere2%#3 of 9Robocorp—not named
The full enterprise standing →What the models said about Automation Anywhere
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“often criticized for being targeted at large enterprises and may not be suitable for smaller businesses” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Has faced criticism for pricing complexity and occasional performance issues in large enterprises, though it remains a major player.” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Review summaries repeatedly mention pricing complexity, steep learning curve, and debugging / integration issues.” GPT-5.4 mini · negative prompt · soft negative
“focus your evaluation on established enterprise leaders with broad ecosystems: UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, and Automation Anywhere” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“a balanced shortlist is often UiPath / Automation Anywhere for scale and AI capabilities” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“provides powerful cognitive automation with extensive bot store, strong AI/ML integration, and high scalability, but has a steeper learning curve and high costs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · alternative
What the models said about Robocorp
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“strong fit for Python developers, but not for teams looking for traditional drag-and-drop RPA builders” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Recommended as the top free option... If you need a free solution, Robocorp is the best choice.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“For very tight budgets: Start with Robocorp or Microsoft Power Automate's free tier to learn and prototype.” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for teams with Python developers looking to eliminate per-bot license fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.