Index › IT › IT operations and endpoint › EA tools › Archi vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Enterprise architecture tools · November 2026 Edition

Archi vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Zero of fourteen models named Archi first on the direct prompt; zero named Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. Archi was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect by thirteen and Archi carries 24 labels and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Archi

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share14%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate17%35%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels2426A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Archi reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Ardoq was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. SAP LeanIX vs Archi · SAP LeanIX vs Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect · Ardoq vs Archi

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the enterprise architecture tools page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ArchiFirst choices, of fourteen modelsSparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative002 against Archi
Budget-constrained831 against Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Scale-constrained001 against Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Negative002 against Archi · 7 against Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Archi and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 77 answers naming Archi and the 67 naming Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. In those answers Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect took the first choice four times and Archi twelve.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Archi and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect stood in it.
ModelDirectARParaphraseARComparativeARBudget-constrainedARScale-constrainedARNegativeAR
Claude Haiku 4.5ARAR
GPT-5.4 miniAR
Gemini 3.5 FlashAR
Perplexity SonarAR
Grok 4.20ARARAR
Mistral SmallARAR
DeepSeek V4 FlashAR
Llama 4 MaverickAR
Qwen 3.7 FlashAR
Kimi K2ARAR
GLM 4.7 FlashXAR
MiniMax M2.5ARAR
GPT-6 LunaAR
Muse Glimmer 30BAR
AR Archi Sparx Systems Enterprise ArchitectAR first choiceAR named as an alternativeAR argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Archi on the left and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Archi and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallArdoq, SAP LeanIX alternatives: Boldo, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
Llama 4 MaverickBoldo alternatives: Aplas, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect
GPT-6 LunaArdoq alternatives: OrbusInfinity, SAP LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Neither was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choice
GPT-5.4 miniArdoq, LeanIX Enterprise Architecture alternatives: ADOIT, Bizzdesign Horizzon, OrbusInfinity, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture, Sparx Enterprise Architect
Gemini 3.5 FlashSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Avolution ABACUS, Sparx Systems
Perplexity SonarSAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, OrbusInfinity, Sparx Enterprise Architect
Grok 4.20SAP LeanIX alternatives: Ardoq, Bizzdesign Horizzon, OrbusInfinity
DeepSeek V4 FlashBoldo alternatives: Ardoq, Orbus Infinity, SAP LeanIX
Qwen 3.7 FlashArdoq alternatives: Lucidchart, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow EAM
Kimi K2Ardoq, SAP LeanIX alternatives: Avolution ABACUS, Orbus Software
GLM 4.7 FlashXArdoq, SAP LeanIX alternatives: ADOIT EA Suite, OrbusInfinity, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture
MiniMax M2.5Ardoq alternatives: Bizzdesign Horizzon, Orbus Software, SAP LeanIX, ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture
Muse Glimmer 30BArdoq, SAP LeanIX alternatives: ServiceNow Enterprise Architecture

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Archi leads by twenty-seven points.
Archi31%#1 of 18
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect4%#7 of 18
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Archi leads by nine points.
Archi14%#3 of 12
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect5%#5 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect leads at enterprise.
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect5%#4 of 12
Archi0%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Archi

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Archi lacks enterprise-grade features of commercial tools including no cloud collaboration, limited integrations... This makes it unsuitable for organizations requiring robust enterprise support.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Limitations: No enterprise features like workflow governance, role-based access, or automated discovery” MiniMax M2.5 · comparative prompt · soft negative
“it can become problematic when organizations try to scale it for complex needs” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“starting with Archi for pure ArchiMate work, or Essential Open Source for a self-hosted EA knowledge base, gives the most capability for zero license cost” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest beginning with open-source tools like Archi combined with free collaboration tools” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Archi (free and open-source) is often the best choice for a company with a limited budget.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Verdict: Avoid for large, distributed teams; consider only for small technical teams with heavy modeling needs” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Frequently cited as having the steepest learning curve and the highest number of negative labels among EA tools.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Tools to Avoid ... Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect - Why to avoid: Extremely steep learning curve” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“The standout "best value" answer for most small-to-mid companies is Sparx Enterprise Architect” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect remains the most cost-effective solution on the market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect is the strongest overall choice” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.