CPQ
Asked as “CPQ software”, and as “configure, price, quote tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
51%
Clear leader
51DealHub13PandaDoc06Ploomes CRM30others
51% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−6Since October 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.DealHub held the lead, −6 points on 57%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc45%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 45% → 45%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
DealHub51%Clear leader▼−6Since October 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprise
Salesforce Revenue Cloud57%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 49% → 57%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
PandaDoc45%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 45% → 45%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketDealHub51%Clear leader▼−6Since October 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterpriseSalesforce Revenue Cloud57%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 49% → 57%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01DealHub51%4%55endorsed leader▼−6Since October 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.57% → 51%
DealHub51%4%55endorsed leader▼−6Since October 2026: 57% → 51%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.57% → 51%02PandaDoc13%7%55accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 15% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 13%
PandaDoc13%7%55accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 15% → 13%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.15% → 13%03
HubSpot Commerce Hub4%4%24accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
HubSpot Commerce Hub4%4%24accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%04Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%46%76criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%46%76criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%05
Conga CPQ2%33%48criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%
Conga CPQ2%33%48criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 2%06
Proposify2%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Proposify2%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
QuoteWerks2%11%18accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 2%
QuoteWerks2%11%18accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Oracle CPQ0%49%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Oracle CPQ0%49%41criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11SAP CPQ0%39%33criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10
Qwilr0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qwilr0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Tacton0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Tacton0%7%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Experlogix0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Experlogix0%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
DealHub vs Conga CPQDealHub vs ProposifyDealHub vs QuoteWerksPandaDoc vs HubSpot Commerce HubPandaDoc vs Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDoc vs Conga CPQPandaDoc vs ProposifyPandaDoc vs QuoteWerksHubSpot Commerce Hub vs Salesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hub vs Conga CPQHubSpot Commerce Hub vs ProposifyHubSpot Commerce Hub vs QuoteWerksSalesforce Revenue Cloud vs Conga CPQSalesforce Revenue Cloud vs ProposifySalesforce Revenue Cloud vs QuoteWerksConga CPQ vs ProposifyConga CPQ vs QuoteWerksProposify vs QuoteWerks
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910S11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01DealHub51%
DealHub51%02PandaDoc13%
PandaDoc13%03HubSpot Commerce Hub4%
HubSpot Commerce Hub4%04Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%
Salesforce Revenue Cloud4%05Conga CPQ2%
Conga CPQ2%06Proposify2%
Proposify2%07QuoteWerks2%
QuoteWerks2%08Experlogix0%
Experlogix0%09Tacton0%
Tacton0%10Qwilr0%
Qwilr0%11SAP CPQ0%
12Oracle CPQ0%
Oracle CPQ0%What they warned about
Ten of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, Qwen 3.7 Flash and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud46%
35 of 76 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 11 hard negative
“Salesforce CPQ is not available to new customers. If you are already on it, plan a migration decision now rather than staying in maintenance mode.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Conga CPQ33%
16 of 48 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Buying full enterprise tools (e.g., Oracle CPQ, Conga Enterprise) ... often leads to high maintenance costs and low sales adoption.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt
Oracle CPQ49%
20 of 41 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Buying full enterprise tools (e.g., Oracle CPQ, Conga Enterprise) when a lighter tool would suffice often leads to high maintenance costs” Gemini 3.5 Flash, direct prompt
SAP CPQ
39%
13 of 33 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid enterprise CPQs like ... Oracle or SAP unless you have a much larger budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 765 links across 187 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 19 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Software Advice41 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
38 answers · 66 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Albato30 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Capterra22 answers · 27 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zapier17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Reddit14 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · PandaDoc14 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Salesforce13 answers · 16 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow13 answers · 14 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Hyperline12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
11 answers · 11 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
40 answers · 10 models
30 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 6 models
11 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best cpq software”, “cpq software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DealHub dealhub.io | 51% | 172 | 1,900 | 83 | 319,299 | $372 | 62 | 1 |
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 13% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | |
| Ploomes CRM | 6% | |||||||
| HubSpot parent site HubSpot Commerce Hub 4% | 4% | 71 | 368,000 | 9,776 | ||||
| iQuoteXpress iquotexpress.com | 4% | 24 | ||||||
| Salesforce parent site Salesforce Revenue Cloud 4% | 4% | 233 | 550,000 | 60,632 | ||||
| Zoho parent site Zoho CPQ 2%, Zoho CRM 2% | 4% | 331 | 49,500 | 660 | ||||
| Conga CPQ conga.com | 2% | 133 | 320 | 19 | 46,363 | $224 | 120 | |
| Proposify proposify.com | 2% | 259 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | ||
| QuoteWerks quotewerks.com | 2% | 66 | 1,300 | 22 | 3,244 | 27 | 5 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (g2.com, reddit.com, salesforce.com). The first result for “best cpq software” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best CPQ software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which configure, price, quote tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top CPQ tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best CPQ software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a CPQ software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which CPQ tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHubDealHubHeldno first choiceBitrix24, QuoteWerksagainst: Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, IBM CPQ, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Qwilr, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Four alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, QwotyThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocTwo alternatives
MRPeasy, OdooGPT-5.4 miniDealHubDealHubHeldSalesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hubagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue CloudThree alternatives
Configure to WIN, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQGemini 3.5 FlashDealHubagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQDealHubHeldSalesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: Conga CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHub, Logik.ioagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Better Proposals, Conga CPQ, HubSpot native Quote tool, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Seven alternatives
Configure One, Epicor CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Logik.io, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue CloudFive alternatives
Cacheflow, Experlogix, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, SubskribeSix alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQFive alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Sales Hub, Kickflip, QuoteWerks, Zoho CRM with CPQ ModuleThree alternatives
Cacheflow, PandaDoc, SubskribePerplexity SonarDealHubDealHubHeldSalesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Six alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PROS Smart CPQ, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue CloudFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, Experlogix, PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, Salesforce Revenue CloudEleven alternatives
Cincom CPQ, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, Logik.io, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQ, Tacton, VendavoFour alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, QuoteWerks, Quotient, QwilrGrok 4.20Conga CPQagainst: Oracle CPQ, QuoteWerks, SAP CPQDealHubChangedConga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudPandaDocagainst: SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Bigmachines, Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Salesforce Revenue CloudFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, NetSuite CPQ, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue CloudSix alternatives
ConnectWise Sell, DealHub, Experlogix, PandaDoc, Proposify, SAP CPQTwo alternatives
Proposify, QuoteWerksMistral SmallDealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudChangedSalesforce Revenue CloudiQuoteXpressno first choiceagainst: Apttus, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
One alternative
Conga CPQTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, PandaDocFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, ConnectWise Sell, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, PandaDoc, ProposifyDeepSeek V4 FlashDealHubagainst: Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubHeldagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudPandaDoc, iQuoteXpressagainst: HubSpot Commerce Hub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Apttus, Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocOne alternative
HubSpot Commerce HubSix alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQOne alternative
Odoo CPQThree alternatives
DealHub, Hyperline, PandaDocLlama 4 MaverickDealHubDealHubHeldno first choicePandaDoc, Proposifyno first choiceagainst: Apttus, Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, MonetizeNow, Salesforce Revenue CloudThree alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, MonetizeNow, PandaDocQwen 3.7 FlashPandaDocagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubChangedagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudConga CPQZoho CPQagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Apttus, Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Four alternatives
Conga Quotes, DealHub, Proposify, Zoho CPQThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, PandaDoc, UnifyrFive alternatives
ConnectWise Sell, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudThree alternatives
PandaDoc, QuoteWerks, Synergalize CPQKimi K2DealHubagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHubHeldagainst: Conga CPQ, QuoteWerks, Salesforce Revenue CloudSalesforce Revenue CloudHubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHub, Vendoriagainst: SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Configure One, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDocOne alternative
PandaDocFive alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHubFour alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue CloudGLM 4.7 FlashXDealHubDealHubHeldSalesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Conga CPQ, Guidewire CPQ, Manugistics CPQ, Oracle Siebel CPQPloomes CRMagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choicenothing named
Six alternatives
Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue CloudFour alternatives
DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, SAP CPQFour alternatives
HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Proposify, iQuoteXpressMiniMax M2.5BetterCommerce CPQ, DealHubagainst: Salesforce Revenue CloudDealHub, Vendori CPQChangedno first choicePloomes CRMno first choiceagainst: Maxio, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Two alternatives
Expedite Commerce, HubSpot Commerce HubThree alternatives
Conga CPQ, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudTwo alternatives
Proposify, QuotientGPT-6 LunaDealHubDealHubHeldno first choiceZoho CRMagainst: PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Three alternatives
HubSpot's built-in CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonFour alternatives
Experlogix, HubSpot's native CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonSeven alternatives
Conga CPQ, DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, TactonOne alternative
QuoteWerks DesktopMuse Glimmer 30BDealHubDealHubHeldSalesforce Agentforce Revenue Management, formerly Salesforce Revenue Cloudagainst: Conga CPQPloomes CRMagainst: Conga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloudno first choiceagainst: Apttus, Bigmachines, CSG Quote & Order, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, SteelBrick
Six alternatives
BetterCommerce CPQ, Combeenation, Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Salesforce Revenue CloudTwo alternatives
HubSpot Revenue Hub CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudSix alternatives
DealHub, Experlogix, Oracle CPQ, QuoteWerks, SAP CPQ, TactonFive alternatives
Bitrix24, Odoo, PandaDoc, Proposify, iQuoteXpressBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:29 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:58 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:44 | yes | 11 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:32 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:42 | yes | 16 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:21 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:53 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 15 | 78 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:20 | yes | 14 | 59 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:33 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 12 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:52 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:04 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:22 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 13 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:31 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 22 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 10 | 47 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:13 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 12 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:21 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:28 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:53 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:14 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:52 | yes | 10 | 84 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 8 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:51 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 2 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:47 | yes | 8 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:56 | yes | 24 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:45 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 15:24 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 13 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:38 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:18 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:32 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:14 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:32 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 22 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:47 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 16:50 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 19 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:27 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:07 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 4 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 19 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:01 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:31 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 18 | 72 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 15 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:04 | yes | 20 | 95 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:26 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:37 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Cincom read as Cincom CPQ
Conga read as Conga CPQ
Conga (Conga Advantage CPQ) read as Conga CPQ
HubSpot read as HubSpot Commerce Hub
Oracle read as Oracle CPQ
PROS read as PROS Smart CPQ
SAP read as SAP CPQ
Salesforce CPQ read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Agentforce Revenue Management) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Part of Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (Salesforce Quotes) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (formerly SteelBrick) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (formerly Steelbrick) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce CPQ (now part of Agentforce Revenue Cloud) read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Salesforce Revenue Management read as Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Zuora read as Zuora CPQ
Unresolved, counted raw
CPQ Cloud
CSG Quote & Order
CallidusCloud CPQ
Combeenation
Configure One
Configure One (by Revalize)
Configure to WIN
Conga Quotes (Part of Apttus)
DriveWorks
Guidewire CPQ
HubSpot native Quote tool
HubSpot's built-in CPQ
HubSpot's native CPQ
HubSpot's native offering
IBM Sterling CPQ
Logik.ai
Manugistics CPQ
Materia
Odoo CPQ
Oracle Siebel CPQ
ProsperStack
QuoteWerks Desktop
Salesforce Agentforce Revenue Management, formerly Salesforce Revenue Cloud
SteelBrick
Synergalize CPQ
Zoho CRM with CPQ Module
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.