Pricing optimization
Asked as “pricing optimization platform”, and as “price management and optimization software”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 47 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
49%
Clear leader
49Pricefx19Prisync06Zilliant26others
49% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Pricefx held the lead, −4 points on 53%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Prisync41%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 46% → 41%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Pricefx49%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprisePricefx42%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 38% → 42%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Prisync41%Clear leader▼−5Since October 2026: 46% → 41%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPricefx49%Clear leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageEnterprisePricefx42%Clear leader▲+4Since October 2026: 38% → 42%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Pricefx49%15%54endorsed leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.53% → 49%
Pricefx49%15%54endorsed leader▼−4Since October 2026: 53% → 49%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.53% → 49%02Prisync19%11%37accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 19% → 19%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 19%
Prisync19%11%37accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 19% → 19%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 19%03
Zilliant6%28%50criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%
Zilliant6%28%50criticized challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 5% → 6%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 6%04PriceLabs4%22%23accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
05
Price2Spy4%12%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
Price2Spy4%12%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%06
Competera2%25%32criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Competera2%25%32criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management2%38%42criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
08
Conga Price Optimization & Management2%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Conga Price Optimization & Management2%18%11accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Vendavo0%35%49criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Vendavo0%35%49criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Pricefx vs Price2SpyPricefx vs CompeteraPricefx vs PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPricefx vs Conga Price Optimization & ManagementPrisync vs ZilliantPrisync vs PriceLabsPrisync vs Price2SpyPrisync vs CompeteraPrisync vs PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPrisync vs Conga Price Optimization & ManagementZilliant vs PriceLabsZilliant vs Price2SpyZilliant vs CompeteraZilliant vs PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementZilliant vs Conga Price Optimization & ManagementPriceLabs vs Price2SpyPriceLabs vs CompeteraPriceLabs vs PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPriceLabs vs Conga Price Optimization & ManagementPrice2Spy vs CompeteraPrice2Spy vs PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPrice2Spy vs Conga Price Optimization & ManagementCompetera vs PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementCompetera vs Conga Price Optimization & ManagementPROS Smart Price Optimization & Management vs Conga Price Optimization & Management
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203P04
0506P07
0809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Pricefx49%
Pricefx49%02Prisync19%
Prisync19%03Zilliant6%
Zilliant6%04PriceLabs4%
05Price2Spy4%
Price2Spy4%06Competera2%
Competera2%07PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management2%
08Conga Price Optimization & Management2%
Conga Price Optimization & Management2%09Vendavo0%
Vendavo0%What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zilliant28%
14 of 50 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Other platforms that have been criticized include PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Zilliant, and Competera.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management
38%
16 of 42 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Other platforms that have been criticized include PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Zilliant, and Competera.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
Vendavo35%
17 of 49 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid: Vendavo, PROS, and any tool that uses personal browsing data to set individual prices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Competera25%
8 of 32 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Other platforms that have been criticized include PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Zilliant, and Competera.” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 850 links across 197 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 41 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
40 answers · 52 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GetApp39 answers · 55 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Software Advice24 answers · 32 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Capterra23 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
22 answers · 39 citations · 9 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow18 answers · 20 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Virto Commerce18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Pricefx15 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
32 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 9 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 6 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best pricing optimization platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pricefx pricefx.com | 49% | 162 | 1,000 | 18 | 11,062 | 0 | |
| Prisync prisync.com | 19% | 126 | 320 | 1 | 31,049 | 5 | |
| Zilliant zilliant.com | 6% | 136 | 880 | 30 | 3,164 | 0 | |
| PriceLabs pricelabs.co | 4% | 54 | |||||
| Price2Spy price2spy.com | 4% | 51 | 260 | 0 | 16,961 | 27 | |
| Competera competera.ai | 2% | 69 | 210 | 1 | 25,366 | 0 | |
| PROS pros.com PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management 2% | 2% | 121 | 17,307 company | 1 | |||
| Conga conga.com Conga Price Optimization & Management 2% | 2% | 41 | 27,100 | 2,882 | 46,363 company | $224 | 120 |
| Vendr | 2% | 1,600 | 533 | ||||
| DATA SEEKERS | 2% |
Google's top ten for the one searches hold 8 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best pricing optimization platform” is iproyal.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best pricing optimization platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which price management and optimization software would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top pricing optimization platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best pricing optimization platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a pricing optimization platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which pricing optimization platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PricefxPricefxHeldPricefxPrisyncno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Pricemoov, ZilliantThree alternatives
Conga Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, ZilliantSeven alternatives
Competera, Pricemoov, Prisync, RELEX Solutions, Revionics, Vendavo, ZilliantTwo alternatives
Price2Spy, PricefyGPT-5.4 miniConga Price Optimization & ManagementPricefxChangedVendavoIntelisagainst: Conga Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, Zilliantno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Vistaar, ZilliantTwo alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, VendavoFive alternatives
Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, Revionics, ZilliantOne alternative
PrisyncGemini 3.5 FlashPricefxPricefxHeldPricefxPrice2Spyagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, Vendavo, Zilliantno first choiceagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, Zilliant
Four alternatives
Enable, Pricemoov, Vendavo, ZilliantFour alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricemoov, Vendavo, ZilliantEight alternatives
Competera, Metronome, Omnia Retail, Prisync, Revionics, Schematic, Vendavo, ZilliantSeven alternatives
Maxio, PriceMole, Pricefy, Prisync, ProfitWell, SYMSON, TogaiPerplexity SonarPricefxagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPricefxHeldagainst: Conga Price Optimization & ManagementPricefxPrisyncagainst: Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, Vendr, Zilliantno first choiceagainst: Competera, Price2Spy, Pricefx, Prisync, Quicklizard, Vendavo
Three alternatives
Native commerce-platform pricing, Vendavo, ZilliantTwo alternatives
Vendavo, ZilliantEleven alternatives
7Learnings, Buynomics, Competera, Conga Price Optimization & Management, Omnia Retail, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Prisync, Quicklizard, RELEX, Vendavo, ZilliantThree alternatives
Intelligems, Price2Spy, PriceLabsGrok 4.20Pricefxagainst: Omnia, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, PriceLabs, VendavoPricefxHeldagainst: PriceLabs, PriceShapePrisyncPriceLabsagainst: Competera, Pricefx, Vendavono first choiceagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, PriceLabs, Pricefx, Priya AI, Smartpricing, Vendavo, Zilliant
One alternative
ZilliantFour alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Price Intelligently, Vendavo, ZilliantThree alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, VendavoFour alternatives
7Learnings, DATA SEEKERS, PriceIntelGuru, PrisyncMistral SmallPricefx, ZilliantPricefx, ZilliantHeldPricefxPriceLabs, Prisyncno first choiceagainst: Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, Zilliant
Two alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo PricepointTwo alternatives
Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementSeven alternatives
BlackCurve, Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, PriceLabs, Revionics, Vendavo, ZilliantOne alternative
VendrDeepSeek V4 FlashPricefxPricefxHeldagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, ZilliantPROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPrice2Spyno first choiceagainst: Vendavoagainst: BQool, Competera, ProductLabs / Amazon repricers, Repricer.com, Wiser
Six alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Price2Spy, Prisync, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Vendavo, ZilliantOne alternative
VistaarEight alternatives
Competera, PriceLabs, Pricefx, Prisync, RELEX Solutions, Revionics, Vendavo, VistaarThree alternatives
PriceLabs, Prisync, VendrLlama 4 MaverickCompeterano first choiceChangedno first choicePrisyncno first choiceagainst: Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, Zilliant
Three alternatives
Minderest, Pricefx, Vendavo PricepointTwo alternatives
DATA SEEKERS, PriceLabsQwen 3.7 FlashProPriceagainst: ZilliumPricefxChangedPricefxPrisyncno first choiceagainst: Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, Zilliant
Three alternatives
Impartner, Pricefx, ProfitectThree alternatives
BlackCurve, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, ZilliantEleven alternatives
BlackCurve, Blue Yonder, Competera, Multiply, Omnia Retail, PROS Smart Pricing, PriceLabs, Prisync, SellerActive, Vendavo, ZilliantThree alternatives
PriceLabs, RepricerExpress, SellerActiveKimi K2Pricefxagainst: VendavoPricefxHeldPROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPrisyncagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, Zilliantno first choiceagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefx, Vendavo, Zilliantagainst: Competera, Dynamic Pricing AI, Price2Spy, PriceLabs, Prisync
Two alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, ZilliantTwo alternatives
Vendavo, ZilliantSix alternatives
Competera, Intelligence Node, Pricefx, Prisync, Vendavo, ZilliantTwo alternatives
PriceLabs, VendrGLM 4.7 FlashXPriceProagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, ZilliantPricefxChangedPricefxDATA SEEKERS, Vendrno first choiceagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, Zilliant
Five alternatives
Adobe Commerce, Pricefx, Pricerium.ai, SAP Commerce, Salesforce Commerce CloudFour alternatives
Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Prisync, VendavoFive alternatives
BlackCurve, Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, ZilliantSeven alternatives
Price2Spy, PriceLabs, Prisync, RepricerExpress, SellerActive, lotus, pricing-engineMiniMax M2.5PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Pricefxagainst: KlarityPricefx, ZilliantChangedagainst: Prisync, VendavoPricefxPrisyncno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CloudPricing, Vendavo, ZilliantTwo alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, PricePulseFive alternatives
BlackCurve, Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, ZilliantThree alternatives
PriceLabs, Vendr, WiserTwelve alternatives
Aestimat, Conga Price Optimization & Management, DealHub, Oracle, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Probable AI, Revinate, SAP, Salesforce, Spotio, Vendavo, ZilliantGPT-6 LunaPricefxPricefxHeldagainst: Conga's PROS B2B offeringno first choicePrisyncno first choiceagainst: RealPage's rent-optimization products, including YieldStar
Three alternatives
PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, ZilliantOne alternative
VendavoEight alternatives
Competera, Conga Price Optimization & Management, Omnia Retail, Pricefx, Prisync, Revionics, Vendavo, ZilliantMuse Glimmer 30BPricefxagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & ManagementPricefxHeldagainst: PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, Vendavo, ZilliantPricefxPrisyncno first choiceagainst: Bqool Repricing Central, Helium 10, Keepa, PriceLabs, Prisync, Smartpricing
Two alternatives
Vendavo, ZilliantTwo alternatives
Conga Price Optimization & Management, EnableSeven alternatives
Competera, PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management, PriceLabs, RELEX Solutions, Revionics, Vendavo, ZilliantTwo alternatives
PriceLabs, VendrBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:36 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:15 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:41 | yes | 7 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 20 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:28 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:03 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 17:29 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:02 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:59 | yes | 19 | 56 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:01 | yes | 19 | 59 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:43 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:16 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:33 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:22 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:13 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:59 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:17 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 24 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 9 | 57 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 22 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:45 | yes | 3 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:57 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:58 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 19 | 86 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:46 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 15:09 | yes | 23 | 83 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 9 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:47 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:41 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 14:51 | yes | 13 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:10 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:23 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:19 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:25 | yes | 10 | 110 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:14 | yes | 14 | 60 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:33 | yes | 1 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:44 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:45 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:33 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 5 | 13 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 16:45 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:21 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:01 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:41 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 44 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:02 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:59 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:58 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:16 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:30 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:54 | yes | 14 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:55 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:23 | yes | 24 | 53 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 17:16 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:38 | no | 0 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:46 | yes | 2 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga Price Optimization & Management
Conga (Apttus) read as Conga Price Optimization & Management
Conga POM read as Conga Price Optimization & Management
Conga Price Optimization read as Conga Price Optimization & Management
PROS read as PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management
PROS Pricing read as PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management
PROS Smart Price Optimization read as PROS Smart Price Optimization & Management
Unresolved, counted raw
Advanced Dynamic Pricing for WooCommerce
Aestimat
Amazon Repricer
Bqool Repricing Central
Buynomics
ChannelMAX
CloudPricing
Conga's PROS B2B offering
DealIQ (by Upper78)
DynamicPricing AI
Hypersonix Inc.
Inventory Pricing
Keepa
Klarity (by Anaplan)
Lokad
Native commerce-platform pricing
Oracle (Subscription Management)
Oracle Retail
PROS Smart Pricing
Polestar Analytics
PractiFI
PriceMole
PricePro
Pricen
Pricerium.ai
Pricing.AI
Priya AI
ProPrice
Probable AI
ProductLabs / Amazon repricers
Profitect
RE 2.0
RealPage's rent-optimization products, including YieldStar
Repricing Co
RevCentric
Revinate
SAP (BRIM)
SAP Commerce
SAP/Oracle
Sabre
Salesforce (Revenue Cloud)
Zillium
dynamic-pricing-optimizer
lotus
openclaw-genpark-price-tracker
pricing-engine
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.