Product information management
Asked as “product information management system”, and as “PIM for product catalog data”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
33%
Contested · Plytix 24%
33Akeneo PIM24Plytix13Pimcore31others
33% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Akeneo PIM (33%) replaces Plytix (34% then, 24% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Akeneo PIM leads at 33%, replacing Plytix, which led at 34% and stands at 24% now: 9 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Plytix74%Clear leader▼−10Since October 2026: 84% → 74%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
Akeneo PIM33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Akeneo PIM (33%) replaces Plytix (34% then, 24% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterprise
Inriver PIM29%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Plytix74%Clear leader▼−10Since October 2026: 84% → 74%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketAkeneo PIM33%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Akeneo PIM (33%) replaces Plytix (34% then, 24% now), 9 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.This pageEnterpriseInriver PIM29%Contested▲+2Since October 2026: 27% → 29%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Akeneo PIM33%13%62endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 25% → 33%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 33%
Akeneo PIM33%13%62endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 25% → 33%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.25% → 33%02Plytix24%11%57accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 34% → 24%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.34% → 24%
Plytix24%11%57accepted challenger▼−10Since October 2026: 34% → 24%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.34% → 24%03
Pimcore13%18%61accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 2% → 13%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.2% → 13%
Pimcore13%18%61accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 2% → 13%, +11 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.2% → 13%04
Sales Layer11%8%37accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 23% → 11%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.23% → 11%
Sales Layer11%8%37accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 23% → 11%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.23% → 11%05Inriver PIM2%20%50accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Inriver PIM2%20%50accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%06
WISEPIM2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
WISEPIM2%0%13accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%07
Salsify2%38%40criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Salsify2%38%40criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Syndigo0%43%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Syndigo0%43%35criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
Pimberly0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Pimberly0%29%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%12
Informatica Product 3600%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Informatica Product 3600%25%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Stibo Systems STEP0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Stibo Systems STEP0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%08
Catsy0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Catsy0%6%17accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Bluestone PIM0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Bluestone PIM0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11Contentserv0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each
Akeneo PIM vs Inriver PIMAkeneo PIM vs WISEPIMAkeneo PIM vs SalsifyPlytix vs PimcorePlytix vs Sales LayerPlytix vs Inriver PIMPlytix vs WISEPIMPlytix vs SalsifyPimcore vs Sales LayerPimcore vs Inriver PIMPimcore vs WISEPIMPimcore vs SalsifySales Layer vs Inriver PIMSales Layer vs WISEPIMSales Layer vs SalsifyInriver PIM vs WISEPIMInriver PIM vs SalsifyWISEPIM vs Salsify
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910C11
121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Akeneo PIM33%
Akeneo PIM33%02Plytix24%
Plytix24%03Pimcore13%
Pimcore13%04Sales Layer11%
Sales Layer11%05Inriver PIM2%
Inriver PIM2%06WISEPIM2%
WISEPIM2%07Salsify2%
Salsify2%08Catsy0%
Catsy0%09Bluestone PIM0%
Bluestone PIM0%10Stibo Systems STEP0%
Stibo Systems STEP0%11Contentserv0%
12Informatica Product 3600%
Informatica Product 3600%13Pimberly0%
Pimberly0%14Syndigo0%
Syndigo0%What they warned about
Five of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Syndigo43%
15 of 35 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Similar syndication-focused complaints as Salsify, plus unique issues like analytics discrepancies that erode trust in data accuracy.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Salsify38%
15 of 40 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Tops many complaint lists for retail/product syndication... Proceed only if syndication to major retailers is your core need and you have dedicated resources.” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Inriver PIM20%
10 of 50 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Also flags for high TCO and potential scalability/cost issues as catalogs grow... buyers report it can feel rigid and specialist-dependent” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Akeneo PIM13%
8 of 62 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Akeneo PIM has a significant number of negative reviews, particularly regarding its self-hosted Community Edition” Mistral Small, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 793 links across 177 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 28 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Inriver41 answers · 68 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Plytix28 answers · 47 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · WISEPIM23 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · AtroPIM22 answers · 31 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Akeneo21 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Capterra17 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
12 answers · 12 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 9 models
12 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 8 models
10 answers · 9 models
10 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best product information management system”, “product information management system”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akeneo PIM akeneo.com Akeneo PIM 33%, Akeneo Community Edition 4%, Akeneo PIM Community Edition 2% | 38% | 167 | 480 | 15 | 33,435 | 13 | 5 |
| Plytix plytix.com | 24% | 135 | 720 | 12 | 6,008 | 13 | 5 |
| Pimcore pimcore.com | 13% | 155 | 880 | 22 | 4,825 | 0 | 2 |
| Sales Layer saleslayer.com | 11% | 87 | 170 | 51 | 4,785 | 17 | |
| UnoPim unopim.com | 4% | 19 | |||||
| Inriver PIM inriver.com | 2% | 130 | 210 | 4 | 5,120 | 13 | |
| WISEPIM wisepim.com | 2% | 33 | |||||
| AtroPIM atropim.com | 2% | 13 | |||||
| Salsify salsify.com | 2% | 117 | 18,100 | 817 | 70,138 | 14 | 9 |
| entitys.io | 2% |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 12 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (akeneo.com, plytix.com). The first result for “best product information management system” is gartner.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best product information management system for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which PIM for product catalog data would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top product information management systems and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best product information management system for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a product information management system. What should we look at?”Negative“Which product information management systems should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Akeneo PIMAkeneo PIMHeldPimcorePlytixno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimberly PIM, Quable, Salsify, Syndigo
Six alternatives
Agility PIM, Catsy, Pimcore, Plytix, Sales Layer, Stibo Systems STEPTwo alternatives
Plytix, Sales LayerFive alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Plytix, Salsify, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Pimcore, UnoPimGPT-5.4 miniAkeneo PIM, Sales LayerPimcore, Sales LayerChangedAkeneo PIMAkeneo Community Editionno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Catsy DAM & PIM, Inriver PIM, Perfion PIM, Pimberly SaaS PIM & DAM
Two alternatives
Pimberly, PimcoreOne alternative
Akeneo PIMFour alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPTwo alternatives
Pimcore, Sales LayerGemini 3.5 FlashAkeneo PIMAkeneo PIMHeldno first choicePlytixno first choiceagainst: Akeneo Community Edition, IBM Product Master, Informatica MDM, Inriver PIM, NetSuite Item Master, Pimcore Open-Source, SAP Commerce Cloud PIM modules, SAP ERP product tables, Shopify, Syndigo
Four alternatives
Catsy, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, PlytixFour alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Sales LayerSeven alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Sales Layer, Salsify, SyndigoFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Apimio, PIMinto, PimcoreFive alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Bluestone PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, SalsifyPerplexity SonarSales LayerSales LayerHeldAkeneo PIMPlytixagainst: Pimcore Community Editionno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Syndigo
Six alternatives
Catsy, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Pimly, Plytix, WISEPIMFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimberly, Pimcore, SyndigoSeven alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Akeneo Community Edition, UnoPimGrok 4.20Plytixagainst: Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, SAP MDG, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoPimcoreChangedagainst: Inriver PIM, Salsify, Syndigono first choicePlytixagainst: Akeneo Community Edition, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Sales Layer, Salsify, Syndigono first choiceagainst: Informatica Product 360, Oracle PIM, Stibo Systems STEPagainst: Akeneo PIM, Informatica PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimberly, Pimcore, Salsify, Syndigo
Three alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Sales LayerFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Contentserv, Plytix, Sales LayerThree alternatives
Catsy, PIMworks, UnoPimMistral SmallInriver PIMPimcore, entitys.ioChangedInformatica Product 360Akeneo PIM, AtroPIMno first choiceagainst: Salsifyagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify, Syndigo, eTEAM
Three alternatives
Bluestone PIM, Pimcore, PlytixFour alternatives
ANTEROS, Akeneo PIM, WISEPIM, mediaSolution3Seven alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Oracle Product Hub, Pimcore, SAP Master Data Governance, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEPThree alternatives
Pimcore, Plytix PIM, Sales Layer PIMDeepSeek V4 FlashPlytixagainst: SalsifySales LayerChangedAkeneo PIMPlytixAkeneo PIM, Salsifyagainst: Pimberly PIM, Sales Layer, Salsify, Syndigo
Three alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimberly, PimcoreThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, PlytixEight alternatives
Bluestone PIM, Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoThree alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Pimcore, WISEPIMTwo alternatives
Inriver PIM, PlytixLlama 4 MaverickWISEPIMno first choiceChangedno first choiceUnoPimno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Salsify
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Bluestone PIM, Pimcore, Sales LayerFour alternatives
Akeneo PIM, PIMinto, Pimcore, PlytixQwen 3.7 FlashAkeneo PIMagainst: SyndigoAkeneo PIMHeldAkeneo PIMPlytix, UnoPimagainst: Akeneo Community Edition, SalsifyAkeneo PIMagainst: Catsy, Pimcore, Plytixagainst: Inriver PIM, Pimberly, Plytix, Sales Layer, Syndigo
Three alternatives
Inriver PIM, Plytix, SalsifyFour alternatives
Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Sales Layer, WISEPIMFour alternatives
Inriver PIM, Order.co, Pimcore, SalsifyOne alternative
Sales LayerTwo alternatives
Inriver PIM, Sales LayerKimi K2Akeneo PIMagainst: Inriver PIM, SalsifyAkeneo PIM, PimcoreChangedno first choicePlytixagainst: Pimcoreno first choiceagainst: Akeneo Communityagainst: Akeneo PIM, OneTimePIM, Pimberly, Pimcore, Plytix, Salsify, Syndigo
Two alternatives
Pimcore, PlytixTwo alternatives
Inriver PIM, PlytixNine alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Bluestone PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Sales Layer, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoThree alternatives
Akeneo Community Edition, OpenPIM, PIMintoSeven alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Sales Layer, Salsify, SyndigoGLM 4.7 FlashXPimcorePlytixChangedno first choiceAkeneo Community Edition, OpenPIMno first choiceagainst: OneTimePIM, Pimberly, Plytix
Four alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Sales Layer, WISEPIMTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, PimcoreThree alternatives
Plytix, Toriut, WISEPIMMiniMax M2.5Akeneo PIMAkeneo PIM, PimcoreChangedno first choicePlytixno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Agility PIM, BetterCommerce, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, PlytixTwo alternatives
Inriver PIM, entitys.ioSeven alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoTwo alternatives
Akeneo PIM, PimcoreNine alternatives
Akeneo PIM, Catsy, Contentserv, Inriver PIM, Pimcore, Plytix, Sales Layer, Salsify, SyndigoGPT-6 LunaAkeneo PIMAkeneo PIMHeldAkeneo PIMagainst: PimcorePlytixno first choiceagainst: Akeneo PIM, Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, Salsify, Syndigo
Two alternatives
Inriver PIM, PlytixTwo alternatives
Inriver PIM, PlytixSeven alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Inriver PIM, Pimberly, Plytix, Salsify, Stibo Systems STEP, SyndigoOne alternative
Akeneo Community EditionMuse Glimmer 30BAkeneo PIM, Pimcore, Sales LayerAkeneo PIMChangedAkeneo PIM, Inriver PIMAkeneo PIM Community Edition, Plytixagainst: Salsify, Syndigono first choiceagainst: PIMworks, Pimberly, Plytix, Salsify, Syndigo
Four alternatives
Contentserv, Salsify, Syndigo, WISEPIMThree alternatives
Pimcore, Plytix, WISEPIMFive alternatives
Informatica Product 360, Pimcore, Plytix, Salsify, SyndigoThree alternatives
Pimcore Community Edition, TruPIM, WISEPIMBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:31 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 7 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 9 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 21 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:33 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:46 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 18 | 112 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:17 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 9 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:52 | yes | 19 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 16:23 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:02 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:43 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:41 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 22 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:02 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 10 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 13 | 64 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 14:49 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 11 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:48 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:24 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 16:44 | yes | 23 | 44 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 15 | 67 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:03 | yes | 14 | 28 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 15:46 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 15 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:03 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 17:02 | yes | 11 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:00 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 14:17 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 23 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:35 | yes | 6 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:53 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:17 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:58 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:23 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:52 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:35 | yes | 10 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:12 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:13 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 24 | 54 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:56 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:07 | yes | 24 | 68 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 20 | 60 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 3 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:35 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:20 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:09 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:45 | yes | 13 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:08 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:10 | yes | 22 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:57 | yes | 7 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 18 | 81 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 24 | 62 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:54 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:30 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:28 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Akeneo read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Community Edition) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo (Open Source or Enterprise) read as Akeneo PIM
Akeneo Enterprise read as Akeneo PIM
InRiver read as Inriver PIM
Informatica read as Informatica Product 360
Informatica (PDM/MDM Cloud) read as Informatica Product 360
Inriver read as Inriver PIM
Oracle read as Oracle Product Hub
SAP read as SAP Master Data Governance
Stibo Systems read as Stibo Systems STEP
Stibo Systems (STEP) read as Stibo Systems STEP
inRiver read as Inriver PIM
inriver read as Inriver PIM
Unresolved, counted raw
Acquia
Akeneo Community
Boyum IT
Comosoft
Crystallize
DynamicWeb
Feedonomics
IBM Product Master (InfoSphere)
NetSuite Item Master
Pimcore Open-Source
Propel Software
Proton PIM
SAP Commerce Cloud PIM modules
SAP ERP product tables
Salesforce PIM
Stibo Systems MDM
eTEAM
insightsoftware
novomind
novomind iPIM
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.