Index › GTM › Revenue operations › CPQ › Proposify vs QuoteWerks
CPQ · November 2026 Edition

Proposify vs QuoteWerks

Zero of fourteen models named Proposify first on the direct prompt; zero named QuoteWerks. Proposify was named by eight of the fourteen models and QuoteWerks by twelve and Proposify carries 12 labels and QuoteWerks 18, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Proposify

accepted challenger

Named in five categories this edition.

QuoteWerks

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1218A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Proposify reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.DealHub was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. DealHub vs Proposify · DealHub vs QuoteWerks · PandaDoc vs Proposify

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
ProposifyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsQuoteWerks
Direct001 against QuoteWerks
Paraphrase001 against QuoteWerks
Comparative00
Budget-constrained11
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Proposify and QuoteWerks stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Proposify QuoteWerks first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Proposify on the left and QuoteWerks on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Proposify and QuoteWerks stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Qwen 3.7 FlashPandaDoc alternatives: Conga Quotes, DealHub, Proposify, Zoho CPQ

Neither was named

13 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Qwoty
GPT-5.4 miniDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Gemini 3.5 FlashDealHub alternatives: Configure One, Epicor CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Logik.io, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Perplexity SonarDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PROS Smart CPQ, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Grok 4.20Conga CPQ alternatives: DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Mistral SmallDealHub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud alternatives: Conga CPQ
DeepSeek V4 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc
Llama 4 MaverickDealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, MonetizeNow, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Kimi K2DealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc
GLM 4.7 FlashXDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
MiniMax M2.5BetterCommerce CPQ, DealHub alternatives: Expedite Commerce, HubSpot Commerce Hub
GPT-6 LunaDealHub alternatives: HubSpot's built-in CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Muse Glimmer 30BDealHub alternatives: BetterCommerce CPQ, Combeenation, Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Proposify leads by six points.
Proposify9%#2 of 11
QuoteWerks4%#5 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Proposify2%#6 of 12
QuoteWerks2%#7 of 12
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: QuoteWerks leads at enterprise.
QuoteWerks2%#– of 11
Proposify0%#– of 11
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Proposify

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“The best CPQ software for a company with a limited budget is PandaDoc or Proposify” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about QuoteWerks

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“Avoid pure enterprise (e.g., Oracle) or very lightweight tools (e.g., basic QuoteWerks)” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid If: You're a general B2B company” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“start with Bitrix24 (free) or QuoteWerks ($15/month minimum)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Market-leading for IT resellers and MSPs and listed as a top alternative to Oracle and SAP CPQ” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · alternative
“QuoteWerks (Best for QuickBooks/Xero Users) ... offers one-time purchase option.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.