CPQ · November 2026 Edition
Conga CPQ vs Proposify
One of fourteen models named Conga CPQ first on the direct prompt; zero named Proposify. Conga CPQ was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Proposify by eight and Conga CPQ carries 48 labels and Proposify 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in five categories this edition.
First-choice share2%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate33%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels4812A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Conga CPQ reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.DealHub was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. DealHub vs Conga CPQ · DealHub vs Proposify · PandaDoc vs Conga CPQ
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Conga CPQFirst choices, of fourteen modelsProposify
Direct101 against Conga CPQ
Paraphrase001 against Conga CPQ
Comparative202 against Conga CPQ
Budget-constrained012 against Conga CPQ
Scale-constrained001 against Conga CPQ
Negative009 against Conga CPQ
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Conga CPQ and Proposify stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Conga CPQ Proposify first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Conga CPQ on the left and Proposify on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Conga CPQ and Proposify stood in it.
Conga CPQ first, Proposify not the choice
1 of 14 modelsProposify was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Grok 4.20Conga CPQ alternatives: DealHub, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5DealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc, Qwoty
GPT-5.4 miniDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Perplexity SonarDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PROS Smart CPQ, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Mistral SmallDealHub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud alternatives: Conga CPQ
DeepSeek V4 FlashDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc
Qwen 3.7 FlashPandaDoc alternatives: Conga Quotes, DealHub, Proposify, Zoho CPQ
GLM 4.7 FlashXDealHub alternatives: Conga CPQ, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Oracle CPQ, SAP CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Muse Glimmer 30BDealHub alternatives: BetterCommerce CPQ, Combeenation, Conga CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Gemini 3.5 FlashDealHub alternatives: Configure One, Epicor CPQ, Experlogix, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Logik.io, PandaDoc, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Llama 4 MaverickDealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, MonetizeNow, Salesforce Revenue Cloud
Kimi K2DealHub alternatives: HubSpot Commerce Hub, PandaDoc
MiniMax M2.5BetterCommerce CPQ, DealHub alternatives: Expedite Commerce, HubSpot Commerce Hub
GPT-6 LunaDealHub alternatives: HubSpot's built-in CPQ, Salesforce Revenue Cloud, Tacton
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Proposify leads by eight points.
Proposify9%#2 of 11Conga CPQ2%#7 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Conga CPQ2%#5 of 12Proposify2%#6 of 12Enterprise
The order flips: Conga CPQ leads at enterprise.
Conga CPQ20%#2 of 11Proposify0%#– of 11What the models said about Conga CPQ
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Buying full enterprise tools (e.g., Oracle CPQ, Conga Enterprise) ... often leads to high maintenance costs and low sales adoption.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · hard negative
“Conga (due to its complexity and potential for vendor regret)” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise platforms like Salesforce CPQ, SAP, or Conga ... often require $15,000–$50,000+ in consultant implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“If you use Salesforce and need to quote complex bundles: Choose Conga CPQ.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“If you're already in Salesforce: Start with Salesforce CPQ or Conga.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Often the top pick for mid-market B2B versatility” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Proposify
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“The best CPQ software for a company with a limited budget is PandaDoc or Proposify” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
DealHub vs Conga CPQDealHub vs ProposifyPandaDoc vs Conga CPQPandaDoc vs ProposifyHubSpot Commerce Hub vs Conga CPQHubSpot Commerce Hub vs ProposifySalesforce Revenue Cloud vs Conga CPQSalesforce Revenue Cloud vs ProposifyConga CPQ vs QuoteWerksProposify vs QuoteWerksAll twenty-one head-to-head pages and the full CPQ standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.