5 categories · RankedProposify
Proposify is proposal software for sales teams, used to create proposals and streamline the sales process · proposify.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 45%.
DealHub is first at 51%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud is first at 57%.
Why models recommend it
“The best CPQ software for a company with a limited budget is PandaDoc or Proposify”Llama 4 Maverick · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Choose Proposify if you want tight control + strong proposal ops.”GPT-5.4 mini · Comparative question · first choice
“I'd usually recommend PandaDoc or Proposify”GPT-5.4 mini · Paraphrase question · first choice
“1. Proposify (Most Popular for Mid-Market)”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Tools like Proposify and PandaDoc are primarily designed for general proposal creation and lack the specialized features required for RFP response management”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“These tools have received negative feedback for buggy editors and clunky interfaces... Some reviews specifically warn against using them”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“These are primarily sales proposal tools and are not designed for the specific workflows and compliance needs of RFP responses.”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Tools with Buggy Editors or Clunky Interfaces (e.g., Proposify, Better Proposals)... Key Tools/Types to Avoid”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Proposify, over the 290 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 268 | 141 | Compare → | |
| 171 | 0 | View → | |
| 100 | 19 | Compare → | |
| 98 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 91 | 18 | Compare → | |
| 60 | 1 | View → | |
| 53 | 3 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 38 | 3 | View → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → |
What the models named instead of Proposify →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Proposify's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- sales teams
- Price stated
- Basic, Team, Business
- Starting price
- 19
- Free plan or trial
- Start free trial
- Certifications
- GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, PCI DSS
- Customers named
- Fern, Seraph, EverLine, We Treat, 360clean, Abdo, ADT Cybersecurity, Dimensional Innovations
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 259 of the 290 answers that named Proposify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
720 of the 818 domain citations in answers naming Proposify came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 9 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 11 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 417 | 4 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Comparison | 26 | 2 | 2026-09-15 | ||
| Case study | 16 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2025-11-05 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 5 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| News or press | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-15Learn how to write and present a pricing proposal with confidence. discover what to include how to structure pricing com blog
- 2026-09-15Clientpoint alternatives comparison
- 2026-09-08Statement of work vs proposal comparison
- 2026-09-08Is proposify right for you blog
- 2026-08-18Best sales closing productivity tools blog
- 2026-08-18Sales closing statistics blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page proposify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.