5 categories · RankedQwilr
Qwilr is proposal software for modern sales teams, used to build interactive web-page proposals and quotes, with an eSign feature · qwilr.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 45%.
DealHub is first at 51%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud is first at 57%.
Why models recommend it
“Interactive web proposals with embedded media... Higher price and less suitable if conventional PDF workflows dominate”Perplexity Sonar · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Great for interactive, web-based proposals (4.6/5 on Capterra)... but not as specialized for complex RFP responses.”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · alternative
“Choose Qwilr/GetAccept if design-forward, interactive proposals and a digital sales room experience are prioritized”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · alternative
“Choose Quotient or Qwilr if you have straightforward products and want the lowest-cost, easiest implementation.”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Avoid higher-end options like Qwilr ($39+/mo)”Grok 4.20 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“primarily proposal, quoting, design, and e-signature tools—not dedicated RFP knowledge-management platforms”Perplexity Sonar · Comparative question · warning
“Qwilr - Steep Learning Curve: Many users find the interface has a long learning curve that's "discouraging"”MiniMax M2.5 · Negative question · warning
“but it's pricier at $35/user/month annually, so it's better if presentation matters more than low cost”GPT-5.4 mini · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Qwilr, over the 222 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 208 | 120 | View → | |
| 171 | 7 | View → | |
| 82 | 6 | View → | |
| 70 | 9 | View → | |
| 68 | 12 | View → | |
| 57 | 2 | View → | |
| 49 | 2 | View → | |
| 36 | 2 | View → | |
| 31 | 0 | View → | |
| 27 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Qwilr →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Qwilr's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- modern sales teams; all your GTM teams
- Price stated
- Starter: $35 USD per user/month annual billing; Growth: $275 USD per month includes 5 users annual billing only; Scale: $750 USD per month includes 10 users annual billing only
- Starting price
- 35
- Free plan or trial
- No credit card required | 14 day free trial
- Integrations
- 9
- Customers named
- LaunchNotes, Brisant Secure, Lorikeet, Verbate
- Headquarters
- Redfern, Australia
- Founded
- 2014
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 196 of the 222 answers that named Qwilr and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
582 of the 626 domain citations in answers naming Qwilr came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 360 | 20 | 2026-09-24 | Proposals, CRM | |
| Template or tool | 159 | 0 | 2021-09-01 | CRM, SEO | |
| Case study | 43 | 0 | 2026-01-22 | ||
| Comparison | 31 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 25 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 8 | 0 | 2025-01-20 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-10-09 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | 0 | 2021-10-05 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2024-02-17 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Mcp for sales teams blog
- 2026-09-23New 7 proposal prompts to try with the qwilr mcp blog
- 2026-09-22New your gong calls now automatically personalize your proposals blog
- 2026-09-18New automate zoho crm tasks with qwilr blog
- 2026-09-15Consolidate proposal esignature payment tools blog
- 2026-09-15Integrate proposal workflows salesforce blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page qwilr.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.