10 categories · RankedPandaDoc
PandaDoc is a document workflow product for creating proposals, quotes and other business documents, with e-signature support · pandadoc.com ↗
Leads at mid-market. Ranked 1 of 76 for enterprise buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Ranked first. Next is Better Proposals at 9%.
Ranked first. Next is Better Proposals at 9%. 14 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first, contested: Responsive has 14%.
Why models recommend it
“PandaDoc is best for mid-market sales teams that need an all-in-one document workflow and is the most widely adopted proposal AI-powered sales platform in B2B”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · first choice
“Start with PandaDoc if you need a general sales proposal tool—it offers the best combination of functionality, integrations, and price for growing teams.”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, LinkSquares or PandaDoc will likely provide the best balance of features, value, and ease of implementation.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Direct question · first choice
“PandaDoc is the most frequently recommended default because of its mid-market G2 leadership, CRM integration depth and proposal-to-contract coverage.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
What gives them pause
“primarily sales proposal tools and are not designed for the specific workflows and compliance needs of RFP responses”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Avoid as your only CLM if you manage complex supplier, legal, regulatory, or post-signature obligations.”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
“Proposify and PandaDoc are proposal tools rather than RFP tools and the difference matters.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Negative question · warning
“High Caution: PandaDoc ... Billing complaints: Multiple reports of unauthorized charges”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as PandaDoc, over the 598 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 268 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 208 | 4 | View → | |
| 149 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 142 | 35 | Compare → | |
| 126 | 24 | Compare → | |
| 117 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 114 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 84 | 2 | View → | |
| 77 | 16 | Compare → | |
| 76 | 5 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of PandaDoc →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on PandaDoc's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- growing businesses
- Free plan or trial
- Start a trial
- Certifications
- SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ESIGN Act, UETA
- Customers named
- Autodesk, Nomad, TheKey, Wizehire, GoConsensus, Chili Piper
- Headquarters
- South San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2013
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 538 of the 598 answers that named PandaDoc and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
1,278 of the 1,452 domain citations in answers naming PandaDoc came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 6 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 17 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 7 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| Grok 4.20 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 22 |
| Mistral Small | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 14 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 8 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 19 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 5 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 14 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 8 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| Kimi K2 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 21 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 5 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 15 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 13 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 18 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 58 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 23 | 1 | 2026-07-29 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 22 | 1 | 2026-08-06 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2026-01-22 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-189714778 in person signing new experience conference or event
- 2026-08-0610116383 sms verification glossary or explainer
- 2026-07-299997637 pandadoc eu vs us comparison
- 2026-06-2910130797 passcode verification glossary or explainer
- 2026-06-1111379752 pandadoc s free esign plan vs free 14 day trial comparison
- 2026-05-1210131495 import and export volume based products via csv glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page pandadoc.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.