Contract lifecycle management and e-signature · RankedConcord
Concord is an AI-native contract management platform that lets companies create, negotiate, sign, and manage contracts in a single workspace · concord.app ↗
Strongest at small business. Thin evidence at enterprise: nine labels.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 51%.
PandaDoc is first at 29%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Icertis Contract Intelligence is first at 22%.
Why models recommend it
“For most mid-market B2B companies, I'd suggest starting with either: Concord if you prioritize ease-of-use and quick deployment”MiniMax M2.5 · Direct question · first choice
“If you need a robust, all-in-one solution with strong contract management, Concord or Oneflow are top choices.”Mistral Small · Paraphrase question · first choice
“I'd recommend Concord as the best overall choice for a mid-sized B2B company”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paraphrase question · first choice
“start with Concord at $17/user/month or PandaDoc at $19/user/month”MiniMax M2.5 · Budget-constrained question · first choice
What gives them pause
“Be cautious with Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Concord, Conga, PandaDoc, and Agiloft”Perplexity Sonar · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Concord, over the 96 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 77 | 29 | Compare → | |
| 53 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 47 | 9 | Compare → | |
| 40 | 3 | View → | |
| 38 | 2 | View → | |
| 36 | 0 | Compare → | |
| 32 | 0 | View → | |
| 30 | 5 | Compare → | |
| 27 | 1 | View → | |
| 21 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of Concord →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Concord's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- legal, finance, sales, and procurement teams
- Price stated
- Transparent monthly pricing for Concord's contract management software. All plans include unlimited e-signatures, AI extraction, and unlimited free viewers.
- Starting price
- 499
- Free plan or trial
- free 14-day trial
- Integrations
- 5000
- Certifications
- ESIGN, UETA, GDPR, SOC 2 Type II, ESIGN Act, eIDAS
- Customers named
- PAAY, Yates Construction, Vecna. Robotics, GreenSlate, LeoVegas, Pima Community College, Navarino, Sevita
- Headquarters
- Austin
- Founded
- 2014
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 89 of the 96 answers that named Concord and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
244 of the 291 domain citations in answers naming Concord came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 563 | 22 | 2026-09-24 | CLM, CPQ | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 84 | 0 | 2026-06-15 | CLM | |
| Report or ebook | 27 | 0 | 2025-04-13 | CLM | |
| Comparison | 16 | 3 | 2026-09-21 | CLM | |
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2026-06-10 | CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-04-09 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2024-01-15 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2025-04-14 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2024-12-17 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Model context protocol utm blog
- 2026-09-24Severability clause meaning examples blog
- 2026-09-23Contract management for agencies blog
- 2026-09-22Delegation of authority matrix blog
- 2026-09-21Novation vs assignment comparison
- 2026-09-04How to write a contract blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page concord.app exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.