Juro is a contract lifecycle management and e-signature product for legal teams · juro.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 51%.
PandaDoc is first at 29%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Icertis Contract Intelligence is first at 22%.
“Juro (mid-market, user-friendly, modern UI)”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · first choice
“Juro is the best default choice”Perplexity Sonar · Direct question · first choice
“Ironclad and Juro lead in AI-powered contract review, but both require custom quotes”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · alternative
“Best for simpler, faster business-team adoption: Juro or SpotDraft”GPT-5.4 mini · Direct question · alternative
“Browser-only editing, lighter reporting, fewer integrations... teams often outgrow it as complexity increases”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · warning
“noted for high implementation costs ... Buyers should be cautious about these factors”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“Its pricing is not transparent, and it may charge $5K-$20K for setup.”Llama 4 Maverick · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Juro, over the 69 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 13 | View → | |
| 50 | 7 | View → | |
| 38 | 7 | View → | |
| 32 | 1 | View → | |
| 31 | 2 | View → | |
| 29 | 5 | View → | |
| 29 | 2 | View → | |
| 25 | 0 | View → | |
| 24 | 2 | View → | |
| 22 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of Juro →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Juro's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 63 of the 69 answers that named Juro and are not a share of its labels.
186 of the 186 domain citations in answers naming Juro came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glossary or explainer | 357 | undated | CLM, CRM | ||
| Blog | 226 | undated | CLM | ||
| Comparison | 86 | undated | CLM, CRM | ||
| Case study | 37 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 30 | undated | CLM | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | undated | CLM | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
As the event pages on juro.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page juro.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.