2 categories · RankedDocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM is a contract lifecycle management platform from DocuSign that automates the management of agreements across the contract lifecycle · docusign.com ↗
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 51%.
PandaDoc is first at 29%. 1 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Icertis Contract Intelligence is first at 22%.
Why models recommend it
“Shortlist Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Malbek, and one more based on your stack.”Grok 4.20 · Scale-constrained question · first choice
“### 1. The Best Overall: DocuSign CLM”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“Choose DocuSign CLM or Conga if your contract process revolves almost entirely around your existing Salesforce CRM ecosystem”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“For organizations already invested in DocuSign, it extends into CLM with continuity between contract signing and storage”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Dated user interface described as "reminiscent of designs from 2005"... Integration errors between CLM and signature workflows”Kimi K2 · Negative question · warning
“Avoid enterprise solutions – Platforms like DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, or Icertis start at much higher price points”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid enterprise-focused products such as Ironclad or DocuSign CLM”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Enterprise platforms (like Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, or Agiloft) often cost tens of thousands of dollars per year plus hefty implementation fees.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as DocuSign CLM, over the 115 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 87 | 12 | Compare → | |
| 71 | 18 | View → | |
| 71 | 6 | View → | |
| 48 | 14 | Compare → | |
| 45 | 4 | View → | |
| 44 | 0 | View → | |
| 36 | 10 | Compare → | |
| 31 | 4 | View → | |
| 24 | 6 | Compare → | |
| 21 | 2 | Compare → |
What the models named instead of DocuSign CLM →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on DocuSign CLM's own site, not checked by Gane.
- Integrations
- 1000
- Certifications
- ISO 27001, FedRAMP, APEC PPP, CSA STAR, PCI DSS, SSAE 18
- Customers named
- Unilever, Vestwell, Primerica, Flowserve, Heidrick & Struggles, Consor, KORE
- Headquarters
- San Francisco, United States
- Founded
- 2003
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 104 of the 115 answers that named DocuSign CLM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
286 of the 286 domain citations in answers naming DocuSign CLM came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,376 | 3 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| News or press | 276 | undated | |||
| Case study | 218 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 135 | 5 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 122 | 4 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 69 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 50 | 1 | 2026-07-24 | ||
| Report or ebook | 49 | 8 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 33 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 28 | 1 | 2026-09-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22What is a contract glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-17Docusign 101 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-17State of Digital Customer Experience report or ebook
- 2026-09-14Docusign Named a Leader in the IDC MarketScape for Worldwide Integrated Signing Workflow Software 2026 blog
- 2026-09-14Electronic signature vs wet signature comparison
- 2026-09-11Idc marketscape for signing workflows report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page docusign.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.