Seven of fourteen models named Ironclad first on the direct prompt; one named DocuSign CLM. Ironclad was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and DocuSign CLM by twelve and Ironclad carries 54 labels and DocuSign CLM 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
By Docusign, San Francisco, United States, founded 2003. Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the contract lifecycle management and e-signature page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Ironclad and DocuSign CLM were named in the same answer eighty-seven times, of the 150 answers naming Ironclad and the 115 naming DocuSign CLM. In those answers DocuSign CLM took the first choice seven times and Ironclad twelve.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid enterprise solutions – Platforms like DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, or Icertis start at much higher price points” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused products such as Ironclad or DocuSign CLM” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Ironclad, Icertis, or Agiloft” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Recognized as a leader in both enterprise and mid-market segments, Ironclad is praised for its AI-powered contract review, workflow automation, and contract repository.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Ironclad if you want high cross-functional adoption (Sales, Legal, HR), intuitive workflow design, and smooth browser-native redlining.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best Overall: Ironclad ... Start with Ironclad if you want the best balance of modern UX, fast deployment, and proven mid-market fit” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Dated user interface described as "reminiscent of designs from 2005"... Integration errors between CLM and signature workflows” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise solutions – Platforms like DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, or Icertis start at much higher price points” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise-focused products such as Ironclad or DocuSign CLM” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · hard negative
“Shortlist Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, Malbek, and one more based on your stack.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“### 1. The Best Overall: DocuSign CLM” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose DocuSign CLM or Conga if your contract process revolves almost entirely around your existing Salesforce CRM ecosystem” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.