Contract lifecycle management and e-signature for enterprise buyers
Asked as “contract lifecycle management platform”, and as “e-signature and contract management tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 58 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
22%
Contested · Ironclad 19%
22Icertis Contract Intelligence19Ironclad16DocuSign43others
22% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Icertis Contract Intelligence held the lead, +1 point on 21%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc29%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Enterprise
Icertis Contract Intelligence22%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
PandaDoc51%Clear leader▲+8Since October 2026: 43% → 51%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc29%Contested▲+6Since October 2026: 23% → 29%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →EnterpriseIcertis Contract Intelligence22%Contested▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Icertis Contract Intelligence22%21%61accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 22%
Icertis Contract Intelligence22%21%61accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 21% → 22%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.21% → 22%02
Ironclad19%20%60accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 19%
Ironclad19%20%60accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 18% → 19%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.18% → 19%03
DocuSign16%5%22accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 7% → 16%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 16%
DocuSign16%5%22accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 7% → 16%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.7% → 16%04
Agiloft Contract Management Suite12%13%54accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 12%
Agiloft Contract Management Suite12%13%54accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 12%05
DocuSign CLM9%24%41accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 9%
DocuSign CLM9%24%41accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 14% → 9%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.14% → 9%06
Sirion3%11%37accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 3%
Sirion3%11%37accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 3%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11PandaDoc0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
PandaDoc0%50%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09SAP Ariba Contracts0%26%19criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08
Conga CLM0%24%33accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Conga CLM0%24%33accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%10
Workday CLM0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Workday CLM0%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%07
Adobe Acrobat Sign0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Adobe Acrobat Sign0%0%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
PandaDoc vs LinkSquaresPandaDoc vs DocuSignPandaDoc vs ContractWorksPandaDoc vs DocuSign CLMIronclad vs ConcordIronclad vs ContractSafeIronclad vs LinkSquaresIronclad vs DocuSignIronclad vs ContractWorksIronclad vs DocuSign CLMConcord vs ContractSafeConcord vs LinkSquaresConcord vs DocuSignConcord vs ContractWorksConcord vs DocuSign CLMContractSafe vs LinkSquaresContractSafe vs DocuSignContractSafe vs ContractWorksContractSafe vs DocuSign CLMLinkSquares vs DocuSignLinkSquares vs ContractWorksLinkSquares vs DocuSign CLMDocuSign vs ContractWorksDocuSign vs DocuSign CLMContractWorks vs DocuSign CLM
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708S09
1011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Icertis Contract Intelligence22%
Icertis Contract Intelligence22%02Ironclad19%
Ironclad19%03DocuSign16%
DocuSign16%04Agiloft Contract Management Suite12%
Agiloft Contract Management Suite12%05DocuSign CLM9%
DocuSign CLM9%06Sirion3%
Sirion3%07Adobe Acrobat Sign0%
Adobe Acrobat Sign0%08Conga CLM0%
Conga CLM0%09SAP Ariba Contracts0%
10Workday CLM0%
Workday CLM0%11PandaDoc0%
PandaDoc0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Icertis Contract Intelligence21%
13 of 61 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid for This Use Case (Unless Budget is Unlimited) | Icertis | ... can escalate unpredictably as you scale.” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Ironclad20%
12 of 60 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Per-seat pricing is the least predictable model for thousands of users” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
DocuSign CLM24%
10 of 41 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“the most concrete "avoid-or-use-cautiously" pick is DocuSign CLM” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Conga CLM24%
8 of 33 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Steer clear of Conga, ICERTIS, likely burn fingers” Kimi K2, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
73 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 853 links across 207 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 8 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · Sirion25 answers · 38 citations · 13 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Bind23 answers · 34 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Concord21 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
20 answers · 24 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Oneflow19 answers · 20 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SpotDraft19 answers · 19 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Aline18 answers · 18 citations · 11 models
vendor site · DocuSign17 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 25 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Agiloft17 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lexagle17 answers · 19 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
25 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 10 models
11 answers · 7 models
10 answers · 7 models
9 answers · 9 models
9 answers · 6 models
9 answers · 5 models
9 answers · 5 models
8 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best contract lifecycle management platform”, “contract lifecycle management platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icertis Contract Management icertis.com Icertis Contract Intelligence 22%, Icertis Contract Management 2% | 24% | 102 | 140 | 2 | 173,589 | 29 | ||
| DocuSign docusign.com DocuSign 16%, DocuSign CLM 9% | 24% | 104 | 1,000,000 | 9,641 | 2,280,470 | $20 | 120 | |
| Ironclad ironcladapp.com | 19% | 137 | 49,500 | 3,365 | 128,319 | 120 | ||
| Agiloft Contract Management Suite agiloft.com | 12% | 111 | 12,773 | $23,523 | 17 | 2 | ||
| ContractSafe contractsafe.com | 5% | 59 | 1,000 | 7 | 38,687 | $687 | 120 | |
| Sirion sirion.ai | 3% | 66 | 1,600 | 99 | 302,031 | $1,680 | 28 | |
| Concord concord.app | 2% | 89 | 246,000 | 58,369 | 18,445 | |||
| ContractWorks contractworks.com | 2% | 44 | 720 | 3 | 1,720 | 1 | ||
| Aline aline.co | 2% | 8 | 9 | |||||
| Gatekeeper gatekeeperhq.com | 2% | 13 | 40,500 | 3,731 | 69,315 | $83,492 | 20 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (agiloft.com, aline.co, g2.com). The first result for “best contract lifecycle management platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which e-signature and contract management tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade contract lifecycle management platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best contract lifecycle management platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a contract lifecycle management platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which contract lifecycle management platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5SirionDocuSign, IroncladChangedSirionJuroagainst: Conga CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Ironclad, Sirion
Four alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladFour alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Box Sign, Concord, SalesforceSix alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Workday CLMOne alternative
ConcordGPT-5.4 miniIcertis Contract IntelligenceDocuSignChangedIcertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladGatekeeperagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligenceno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, SirionTwo alternatives
Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladFour alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, SirionThree alternatives
CobbleStone Contract Insight, Conga CLM, ContractWorksGemini 3.5 FlashIcertis Contract IntelligenceDocuSignChangedIcertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladAgiloft Contract Management Suiteno first choiceagainst: Concord, Juro, PandaDoc, Proposify, SpotDraft
Four alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, SirionFour alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladFour alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, SirionThree alternatives
Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, LinkSquaresPerplexity SonarIroncladagainst: Agiloft Contract Management SuiteDocuSign CLM paired with DocuSign eSignatureChangedagainst: PandaDocIcertis Contract IntelligenceContractSafeagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLMno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, ContractSafe, Contractbook, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, PandaDoc
Four alternatives
Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IvaluaTwo alternatives
Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladSeven alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion, Workday Contract IntelligenceTwo alternatives
Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladGrok 4.20Icertis Contract IntelligenceDocuSignChangedagainst: Juro, PandaDoc, SpotDraftno first choiceContractWorksAgiloft Contract Management Suite, Ironcladagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligenceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, CobbleStone Software, Conga CLM, ContractPodAi, Coupa CLM, Ivalua, JAGGAER, LinkSquares, Malbek
Three alternatives
DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, SirionThree alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Conga CLM, Icertis Contract IntelligenceSix alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SirionFour alternatives
DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SirionFour alternatives
DocuSign CLM, Gatekeeper, LinkSquares, SirionMistral SmallIroncladDocuSignChangedIcertis Contract IntelligenceAlineagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, BoloSign, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad
Four alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Lexagle, SirionFour alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Agiloft Contract Management Suite, GetAccept, PandaDocSeven alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Coupa CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Malbek, SAP Ariba Contract Management, SirionDeepSeek V4 FlashIcertis Contract IntelligenceDocuSign, Icertis Contract IntelligenceChangedIcertis Contract IntelligenceAgiloft Contract Management Suiteagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SirionAgiloft Contract Management Suiteagainst: Concord, Juroagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Oracle CLM, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion
Three alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Ironclad, SirionFour alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, IroncladSeven alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, Coupa CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, SAP Ariba Contracts, SirionOne alternative
ConcordFour alternatives
ContractPodAi, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladLlama 4 MaverickDocuSign CLMDocuSignChangedno first choiceAgiloft Contract Management Suite, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, OneflowThree alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, PandaDoc, SpotDraftQwen 3.7 FlashIcertis Contract ManagementDocuSign CLMChangedDocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract IntelligenceAgiloft Contract Management Suiteagainst: Icertis Contract Intelligence, Sirionno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, Deel, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, Legals, Oracle Fusion Cloud Contracts, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, SAP Ariba Contracts
Four alternatives
Apttus, DocuSign Adobe CLM, Ironclad, RevvioFour alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Conga CLM, Ironclad, PandaDocFive alternatives
Coupa CLM, HighQ, Ironclad, Microsoft, Salesforce CLMTwo alternatives
Concord, DocuSign CLMKimi K2Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladDocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract IntelligenceChangedIcertis Contract IntelligenceAgiloft Contract Management Suiteagainst: Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladIcertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, Sirionagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SAP Ariba Contracts, Workday CLM
One alternative
Agiloft Contract Management SuiteTwo alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, IroncladSix alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, LinkSquares, Sirion, Workday CLMOne alternative
ContractWorksOne alternative
Agiloft Contract Management SuiteGLM 4.7 FlashXIcertis Contract IntelligenceIroncladChangedno first choiceIcertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, SAP Ariba Contracts
Two alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, IroncladTwo alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, DocuSignOne alternative
Agiloft Contract Management SuiteMiniMax M2.5DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract IntelligenceDocuSign, DocuSign CLMChangedIcertis Contract IntelligenceConcord, ContractSafeno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Ironclad, Malbek CLM, SirionThree alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Icertis Contract IntelligenceFour alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Aline, BoloSign, CobbleStone SoftwareOne alternative
AlineGPT-6 LunaIroncladDocusign IAM with CLMChangedno first choiceIcertis Contract Intelligenceno first choiceagainst: Conga CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SAP Ariba Contracts
Three alternatives
DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SirionThree alternatives
Adobe Acrobat Sign, Icertis Contract Intelligence, IroncladNine alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironclad, LinkSquares, SAP Ariba Contracts, Sirion, Workday CLMOne alternative
Agiloft Contract Management SuiteMuse Glimmer 30BIroncladDocuSignChangedIcertis Contract IntelligenceContractSafeagainst: DocuSign CLM, Icertis Contract Intelligence, Ironcladno first choiceagainst: Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, ContractSafe, DocuSign, SpotDraft, Workday CLM
Six alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign, Icertis Contract Intelligence, SAP Ariba Contracts, SirionThree alternatives
Adobe Acrobat, DocuSign IAM, IroncladFive alternatives
Agiloft Contract Management Suite, Conga CLM, DocuSign CLM, Ironclad, SirionTwo alternatives
Concord, ContractWorksBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 14:30 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:29 | yes | 2 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 13 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 14:34 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 14 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:30 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 15:32 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:50 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 4 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:38 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:35 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:16 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:46 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:39 | yes | 5 | 10 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:19 | yes | 25 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 16:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 13:24 | yes | 10 | 58 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:53 | yes | 24 | 85 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:14 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 16:27 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 13:16 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:50 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 8 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:22 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:21 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:39 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:18 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:09 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 14 | 54 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 15 | 250 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 16:40 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:38 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:07 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 16 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:26 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 17:29 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 13:02 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 10 | 57 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 16:05 | yes | 17 | 85 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 13:47 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:11 | yes | 2 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:50 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:02 | yes | 19 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:42 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:19 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:18 | yes | 10 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 16:51 | yes | 10 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:13 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 17:32 | yes | 24 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:58 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 17 | 71 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 15:30 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:36 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 17:25 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:08 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:08 | yes | 18 | 18 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 14:29 | yes | 25 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:57 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:08 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:03 | yes | 15 | 66 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:03 | yes | 10 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:44 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Agiloft read as Agiloft Contract Management Suite
Cobblestone read as CobbleStone Software
Conga read as Conga CLM
Conga (now Apttus) read as Conga CLM
Coupa read as Coupa CLM
Icertis read as Icertis Contract Intelligence
Icertis (Icertis Contract Intelligence) read as Icertis Contract Intelligence
SAP Ariba read as SAP Ariba Contracts
SAP Ariba CLM read as SAP Ariba Contracts
Workday read as Workday Contract Intelligence
Workday (formerly Evisort) read as Workday Contract Intelligence
Zoho read as Zoho Contracts
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe
Box Sign
DocuSign Adobe CLM
DocuSign CLM paired with DocuSign eSignature
DocuSign IAM
Document Technologies
Docusign IAM with CLM
Legals
Microsoft (Power Apps & Document Intelligence)
OpenText Contract Center
Oracle CLM
Oracle Fusion Cloud Contracts
Outlaw
Revvio
Salesforce (Salesforce Signature)
Salesforce CLM (formerly Apttus & Conga)
SutiCLM
Symfact
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.