Contract lifecycle management and e-signature · RankedAgiloft Contract Management Suite
Strongest at enterprise. Ranked 15 of 87 for mid-market buyers.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 51%.
PandaDoc is first at 29%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Icertis Contract Intelligence is first at 22%.
Why models recommend it
“Enterprise-wide contracting needs governance across legal, sales, procurement | Ironclad or Agiloft”MiniMax M2.5 · Comparative question · first choice
“Choose Agiloft if you have complex, non-standard business logic and need an adaptable low-code platform”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Look at Agiloft only if you need deep customization and have the admin resources to support it.”Kimi K2 · Direct question · alternative
“Agiloft — Recognized for its highly configurable, no-code platform and deep customization”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Ironclad, Icertis, or Agiloft”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Enterprise platforms (like Ironclad, DocuSign CLM, or Agiloft) often cost tens of thousands of dollars per year plus hefty implementation fees.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“First-generation platforms (like traditional Agiloft, CobbleStone, and older enterprise tools) ... configuration meant custom code”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
“reviewers describe technically challenging setup, training demands, and the risk that configuration changes disrupt workflows”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as Agiloft Contract Management Suite, over the 118 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94 | 20 | View → | |
| 85 | 24 | View → | |
| 71 | 5 | View → | |
| 58 | 4 | View → | |
| 56 | 0 | View → | |
| 44 | 13 | View → | |
| 40 | 8 | View → | |
| 32 | 5 | View → | |
| 31 | 2 | View → | |
| 27 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of Agiloft Contract Management Suite →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on Agiloft Contract Management Suite's own site, not checked by Gane.
- For
- organizations
- Price stated
- Contact for pricing
- Integrations
- 1000
- Certifications
- SOC 1, SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701
- Hosting
- inside or outside the USA
- Customers named
- Integra LifeSciences, Goodwill, RUSH University Medical Center, Alkermes, CDW, NetApp
- Headquarters
- Redwood City, United States
- Founded
- 1990
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 111 of the 118 answers that named Agiloft Contract Management Suite and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
294 of the 320 domain citations in answers naming Agiloft Contract Management Suite came from a third party's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
What it publishes
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 241 | 98 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| News or press | 199 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 15 | 15 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 3 | 2026-09-23 | ||
| Conference or event | 7 | 0 | 2023-02-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 4 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-245bb88a29 614e 4883 a065 d5b8b433c972 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-233 ways to unlock contract data to drive new revenue blog
- 2026-09-234 types of contract data and the evolution of data first clm blog
- 2026-09-234 ways procurement will take control of its contracting destiny in 2023 blog
- 2026-09-235 key clauses to include in any vendor agreement blog
- 2026-09-235 lessons for clm implementation blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page agiloft.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.