Proposal software for enterprise buyers
Asked as “proposal software”, and as “sales proposal and quote document tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · Responsive 14%
30PandaDoc14Responsive09DealHub47others
30% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+11Since October 2026: 19% → 30%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.PandaDoc held the lead, +11 points on 19%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
PandaDoc74%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 67% → 74%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc78%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 65% → 78%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterprisePandaDoc30%Contested▲+11Since October 2026: 19% → 30%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This page
PandaDoc74%Clear leader▲+7Since October 2026: 67% → 74%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketPandaDoc78%Clear leader▲+13Since October 2026: 65% → 78%, +13 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterprisePandaDoc30%Contested▲+11Since October 2026: 19% → 30%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01PandaDoc30%18%65accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 19% → 30%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 30%
PandaDoc30%18%65accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 19% → 30%, +11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 30%02
Responsive14%7%46accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 12% → 14%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 14%
Responsive14%7%46accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 12% → 14%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 14%03
DealHub9%0%16accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%
DealHub9%0%16accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 6% → 9%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 9%04
Loopio5%7%42accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 6% → 5%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 5%
Loopio5%7%42accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 6% → 5%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.6% → 5%05
Conga Composer5%7%30accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 12% → 5%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 5%
Conga Composer5%7%30accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 12% → 5%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.12% → 5%06
GetAccept5%14%29accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%
GetAccept5%14%29accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 5%07
Upland Qvidian4%11%19accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%
Upland Qvidian4%11%19accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 4%08
QorusDocs2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
QorusDocs2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
Proposify2%29%45criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Proposify2%29%45criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the three products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
Better Proposals0%82%11criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%
Better Proposals0%82%11criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.4% → 0%11
Qwilr0%26%31criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Qwilr0%26%31criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
Oracle CPQ0%12%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
Oracle CPQ0%12%17accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01PandaDoc30%
PandaDoc30%02Responsive14%
Responsive14%03DealHub9%
DealHub9%04Loopio5%
Loopio5%05Conga Composer5%
Conga Composer5%06GetAccept5%
GetAccept5%07Upland Qvidian4%
Upland Qvidian4%08QorusDocs2%
QorusDocs2%09Proposify2%
Proposify2%10Oracle CPQ0%
Oracle CPQ0%11Qwilr0%
Qwilr0%12Better Proposals0%
Better Proposals0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Proposify29%
13 of 45 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Designed primarily for agencies and small teams... its workflow and governance depth are not on par with enterprise-grade platforms.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
PandaDoc18%
12 of 65 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Avoid These Models Per-user SaaS pricing (e.g., PandaDoc $19–$99/user/month... becomes prohibitively expensive and unpredictable” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
Better Proposals82%
9 of 11 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Built for freelancers and very small agencies; lacks advanced workflow automation, robust role-based permissions, and deep system integrations.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Qwilr26%
8 of 31 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Qwilr 41% 11 of 27 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 938 links across 239 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 40 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
36 answers · 68 citations · 12 models
vendor site · GetAccept31 answers · 40 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Proposify30 answers · 38 citations · 14 models
vendor site · Software Advice26 answers · 39 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Responsive22 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · PandaDoc21 answers · 51 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra20 answers · 39 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Oneflow19 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Loopio15 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
15 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
publisher (Gane)14 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · FreshBooks13 answers · 13 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
21 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 10 models
17 answers · 10 models
15 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 8 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 7 models
12 answers · 6 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best proposal software”, “proposal software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PandaDoc pandadoc.com | 30% | 538 | 60,500 | 510 | 425,196 | $42,516 | 119 | 1 |
| Responsive responsive.io | 14% | 232 | 12,100 | 210,141 | 37,620 | 16 | ||
| Salesforce parent site Salesforce Revenue Cloud 9%, Salesforce CPQ 4% | 12% | 233 | 550,000 | 60,632 | ||||
| DealHub dealhub.io | 9% | 172 | 1,900 | 83 | 319,299 | $372 | 62 | |
| Conga conga.com Conga Composer 5%, Conga CPQ 2% | 7% | 133 | 27,100 | 2,882 | 46,363 company | $224 | 120 | |
| Loopio loopio.com | 5% | 250 | 3,600 | 80 | 4,640 | 26 | ||
| GetAccept getaccept.com | 5% | 235 | 590 | 9 | 15,454 | $4,087 | 14 | 6 |
| Upland Qvidian uplandsoftware.com | 4% | 106 | 40 | 1 | 67,149 | $1,203 | 26 | 5 |
| QorusDocs qorusdocs.com | 2% | 30 | ||||||
| Proposify proposify.com | 2% | 259 | 3,600 | 28 | 38,103 | 27 | 2 |
Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, getaccept.com, pandadoc.com, proposify.com). The first result for “best proposal software” is grantbite.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best proposal software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which sales proposal and quote document tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade proposal tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best proposal software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a proposal software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which proposal tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GetAcceptConga Composer, DealHubChangedno first choiceAutoRFP.ai, Nutshell Quotes & Invoicesno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Loopio, PandaDoc, Responsive
Four alternatives
DealHub, Loopio, PandaDoc, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, ResponsiveOne alternative
LoopioGPT-5.4 miniGetAccept, ResponsiveSalesforce Revenue CloudChangedResponsiveagainst: Upland QvidianProposifyagainst: Qwilrno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHub, Oracle CPQ, QwilrThree alternatives
DealHub, PandaDoc, QwilrSix alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHub, GetAccept, Loopio, PandaDoc, QwilrThree alternatives
Loopio, Responsive, Upland QvidianGemini 3.5 FlashResponsiveConga Composer, Salesforce CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedagainst: DocSend, PandaDocLoopio, ResponsiveQorusDocsno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Bidsketch, Bonsai, GetAccept, Nusii, PandaDoc, Proposable, Proposify, Prospero, Qwilr
Five alternatives
Conga Composer, Loopio, PandaDoc, QorusDocs, Upland QvidianFive alternatives
DealHub, Oracle CPQ, PROS Smart CPQ, Responsive, Upland QvidianSeven alternatives
Arphie, AutoRFP.ai, PandaDoc, Proposify, QorusDocs, Upland Qvidian, XaitPorterFour alternatives
Conga Composer, PandaDoc, Responsive, XaitPorterPerplexity SonarPandaDocDealHubChangedPandaDocLoopioagainst: Nusiino first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Conga Composer, Prospero
Two alternatives
Conga Composer, LoopioFour alternatives
Conga Composer, GetAccept, PandaDoc, ProposifyNine alternatives
Conga Composer, DealHub, Flowcase, GetAccept, Loopio, Proposify, QorusDocs, Qwilr, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
PandaDoc, ProposifyGrok 4.20Responsiveagainst: QwilrPandaDocChangedLoopio, Responsiveagainst: Ignition, Jotform SignResponsiveagainst: Conga Composer, GetAccept, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Proposifyno first choiceagainst: ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity
Three alternatives
Loopio, PandaDoc, ProposifyFive alternatives
Conga Composer, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveFour alternatives
Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrMistral SmallPandaDoc, ResponsiveGetAccept, PandaDocChangedPandaDocDealHub, PandaDocno first choiceagainst: Conga CPQ, GetAccept, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Two alternatives
Conga Composer, GetAcceptOne alternative
DealHubFive alternatives
GetAccept, Loopio, Oracle CPQ, Qwilr, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
Conga Composer, GetAcceptDeepSeek V4 FlashPandaDoc, ResponsiveConga CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedno first choiceLoopioagainst: Better Proposals, ProposifyResponsiveagainst: AutoRFP.ai, AutogenAI, Better Proposals, Bonsai, Concord, DeepRFP, Inventive AI, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive, Sharepoint-based custom solutions, Upland Qvidian
Three alternatives
GetAccept, Loopio, Upland QvidianFour alternatives
Conga Composer, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, ResponsiveTen alternatives
GetAccept, Icertis, Loopio, Oracle CPQ, PandaDoc, Proposify, QorusDocs, Qwilr, Responsive, Salesforce CPQTwo alternatives
Inventive AI, Proposal PilotFour alternatives
Conga Composer, Loopio, Oracle CPQ, PandaDocLlama 4 MaverickPandaDocno first choiceChangedno first choicePandaDocno first choiceagainst: PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Three alternatives
GetAccept, Proposify, QwilrQwen 3.7 FlashUpland QvidianSalesforce CongaChangedPandaDoc, ResponsiveAspire, Service Fusionagainst: PandaDoc, Proposifyno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
CommandAI, Conga Composer, PandaDoc, Proposify, SeismicThree alternatives
DealHub, Proqato, QuintanceFive alternatives
Conga Composer, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, Upland QvidianThree alternatives
DealHub, GetAccept, Portal.ioKimi K2PandaDocDealHub, Salesforce Revenue CloudChangedPandaDocPandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Nusii, PandaDoc, Proposa, Proposify, Prospero, Qwilr
Two alternatives
Conga Composer, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
Conga CPQ, PandaDocEight alternatives
ClientPoint, Flowcase, GetAccept, Loopio, Oracle CPQ, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
GetAccept, Proposal PilotGLM 4.7 FlashXPandaDocSalesforce Revenue CloudChangedPandaDocLoopio, Upland Qvidianagainst: AutoRFP.ai, PandaDoc, Proposifyno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, GetAccept, HubSpot Commerce Hub, Microsoft Word, NinjaPropose, PandaDoc, Proposify, Standard cloud storage (SharePoint/Box) with manual sharing
Four alternatives
DealHub, GetAccept, Responsive, Salesforce CPQThree alternatives
ActiveDocs, DealHub, PandaDocFive alternatives
Oracle CPQ, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive, XaitPorterOne alternative
QuoteWerksMiniMax M2.5PandaDoc, ResponsivePandaDoc, Salesforce CPQChangedLoopio, ResponsiveQuoteWerksagainst: Nusiino first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Loopio, Oracle CPQ, Proposify, Responsive
Three alternatives
Loopio, Oracle CPQ, ProposifyFour alternatives
Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, ResponsiveThree alternatives
Conga Composer, PandaDoc, Upland QvidianTwo alternatives
Loopio, ResponsiveGPT-6 LunaDealHubConga ComposerChangedResponsivePandaDocagainst: Proposifyno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Loopio, PandaDoc, ResponsiveTwo alternatives
Oracle CPQ, Salesforce Revenue CloudSix alternatives
Conga Composer, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Upland QvidianOne alternative
LoopioMuse Glimmer 30BPandaDocPandaDocHeldPandaDocPandaDocno first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, HoneyBook, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Two alternatives
Conga Composer, ResponsiveThree alternatives
Conga Composer, Oracle CPQ, Salesforce CPQSeven alternatives
Conga Composer, GetAccept, Loopio, Proposify, QorusDocs, Responsive, Upland QvidianThree alternatives
AutoRFP.ai, Conga Composer, ResponsiveBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 14:18 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 13:27 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 17:34 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:11 | yes | 5 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 15:23 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 15:04 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:50 | yes | 14 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 14:27 | yes | 23 | 57 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 16:19 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 14 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 15:52 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:44 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 16:51 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:17 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:39 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 14:09 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:52 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 19 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 24 | 87 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:50 | no | 0 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:07 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:54 | yes | 15 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 16:35 | yes | 9 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:51 | yes | 5 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:30 | yes | 6 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 16:39 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 17:00 | yes | 9 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 24 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:37 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 14 | 39 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 25 | 80 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 20 | 39 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:54 | yes | 7 | 16 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 15:05 | yes | 24 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 13:35 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:05 | yes | 11 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 15:44 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:38 | yes | 25 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:55 | yes | 22 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 14:12 | yes | 20 | 151 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 24 | 69 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 22 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 17:03 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 14:52 | yes | 21 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 13:57 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:31 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 15:04 | no | 0 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:06 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:39 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:32 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:47 | yes | 25 | 41 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:08 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 17:15 | yes | 15 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 16:27 | yes | 24 | 106 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:16 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:46 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:28 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 15:12 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 13 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 14:00 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:39 | yes | 25 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 17:33 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 13:54 | yes | 23 | 60 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 14:20 | yes | 20 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:33 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga Composer
Conga (CPQ/Composer) read as Conga Composer
Conga (Conga Composer / Conga Sign) read as Conga Composer
Conga (Salesforce Cloud CPQ) read as Conga Composer
Conga (by ThomaSoft) read as Conga Composer
HubSpot read as HubSpot Commerce Hub
Unresolved, counted raw
ActiveDocs
ArXiv / Ombud
CommandAI (formerly Loopio)
GovCon
NinjaPropose
Nutshell Quotes & Invoices
Portal.io
Proposa
Proqato
Quintance
Quorpore
Rellayto
Salesforce Conga
Sharepoint-based custom solutions
Standard cloud storage (SharePoint/Box) with manual sharing
Tenderbolt
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.