Oracle CPQ is a cloud-based, globally accessible quoting tool from Oracle that supports structured pricing and customized proposals · oracle.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 45%.
DealHub is first at 51%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud is first at 57%.
“If you are a Manufacturer with thousands of parts: Choose Oracle CPQ or SAP CPQ.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Drawbacks: High cost, long implementation timelines, and complex administrative maintenance.”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Large enterprises with complex catalogs, pricing, approvals, and high quote volumes”GPT-6 Luna · Comparative question · alternative
“Best for: Large enterprises, especially those already using Oracle ecosystems”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · alternative
“Buying full enterprise tools (e.g., Oracle CPQ, Conga Enterprise) when a lighter tool would suffice often leads to high maintenance costs”Gemini 3.5 Flash · Direct question · warning
“Avoid enterprise CPQs like ... Oracle or SAP unless you have a much larger budget.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Enterprise-grade CPQs like Oracle CPQ are often recommended to be avoided initially”Mistral Small · Negative question · warning
“The tools to be most cautious about are Salesforce CPQ and Oracle CPQ Cloud”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Negative question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Oracle CPQ, over the 160 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 139 | 45 | View → | |
| 108 | 0 | View → | |
| 102 | 16 | View → | |
| 88 | 9 | View → | |
| 75 | 24 | View → | |
| 34 | 1 | View → | |
| 32 | 4 | View → | |
| 31 | 1 | View → | |
| 29 | 0 | View → | |
| 28 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of Oracle CPQ →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Oracle CPQ's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 144 of the 160 answers that named Oracle CPQ and are not a share of its labels.
421 of the 452 domain citations in answers naming Oracle CPQ came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |