SAP CPQ
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
PandaDoc is first at 45%.
DealHub is first at 51%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Salesforce Revenue Cloud is first at 57%.
Why models recommend it
“Highly complex configurable products ... Conga, SAP, Experlogix, or Tacton tend to excel.”Grok 4.20 · Comparative question · alternative
“known for strong pricing controls and is often used in industries with complex product configurations”Mistral Small · Comparative question · alternative
“If you are a Manufacturer with thousands of parts: Choose Oracle CPQ or SAP CPQ.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · alternative
“Best for: Companies already using SAP ERP who want to reuse existing configuration rules”Kimi K2 · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“Avoid enterprise CPQs like ... Oracle or SAP unless you have a much larger budget.”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid Salesforce Revenue Cloud, SAP CPQ, and Oracle CPQ”Perplexity Sonar · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Built for large enterprises with complex needs”Kimi K2 · Budget-constrained question · warning
“SAP CPQ if you're not already committed to SAP—or can't support a complex rollout. Reviews flag setup and interface complexity.”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as SAP CPQ, over the 127 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 123 | 42 | View → | |
| 108 | 8 | View → | |
| 87 | 15 | View → | |
| 78 | 6 | View → | |
| 61 | 22 | View → | |
| 32 | 3 | View → | |
| 31 | 5 | View → | |
| 30 | 0 | View → | |
| 27 | 1 | View → | |
| 26 | 4 | View → |
What the models named instead of SAP CPQ →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
At a glance
Stated on SAP CPQ's own site, not checked by Gane.
- Headquarters
- Walldorf, Germany
- Founded
- 1972
- Also from SAP
- SAP Address Validation, SAP Analytics Cloud, SAP Ariba, SAP Ariba CLM, SAP Ariba Contracts, SAP Billing and 42 more
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 117 of the 127 answers that named SAP CPQ and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for SAP CPQ, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |