Index › GTM › Revenue operations › Proposals › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Proposal software for small business buyers

Asked as “proposal software”, and as “sales proposal and quote document tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 53 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
74%
Clear leader
74PandaDoc09Better Proposals06Proposify11others

74% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+7Since October 2026: 67% → 74%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.PandaDoc held the lead, +7 points on 67%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01PandaDoc74%10%68endorsed leader▲+7Since October 2026: 67% → 74%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.67% → 74%
02Better Proposals9%10%52accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 8% → 9%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 9%
03Proposify6%20%64accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
04Qwilr2%13%52accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
10Responsive0%42%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
09Loopio0%36%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Jotform0%18%11accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
06Bonsai0%6%16accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
05HoneyBook0%5%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07GetAccept0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each

One product takes 74% of first choices here, so the chart would put nine markers in one corner and one at the far edge. The two measurements it plots are columns in the standing above: share, and the negative label rate. Two products carry a negative rate above 25% in this category.

What they warned about

Twelve of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5 and Llama 4 Maverick changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Proposify
20%
13 of 64 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Several users report a cumbersome text editing experience, inconsistent formatting, and difficulty aligning multi‑page content.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
PandaDoc
10%
7 of 68 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“PandaDoc criticized as "expensive" for online forms or small teams; ... frequent complaints about difficult editing post-send” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Better Proposals
10%
5 of 52 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Tools like Proposify and Better Proposals have been flagged in model testing and user reviews for: Buggy editors” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Qwilr
13%
7 of 52 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid paying $35–$50/month for tools like Proposify or Qwilr” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

72 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 725 links across 150 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 40 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Software Advice36 answers · 50 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Proposify33 answers · 40 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Spotsaas27 answers · 33 citations · 9 models
vendor site · PandaDoc23 answers · 45 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Zapier23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
22 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Capterra19 answers · 28 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Qwilr19 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow19 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · FreshBooks17 answers · 19 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best proposal software”, “proposal software”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
PandaDoc pandadoc.com74%53860,500510425,196$42,5161191
Better Proposals betterproposals.io9%1241,3006524,25154
Proposify proposify.com6%2593,6002838,103272
Prospero goprospero.com4%152,4001,1789082
Qwilr qwilr.com2%1964,4002310,83727
DocuSign docusign.com2%641,000,0009,6412,280,470$20120
Google Docs/Sheets2%
Canva canva.com2%18524,900,000183,42181,177,765101
HoneyBook honeybook.com0%7749,50055840,090116
Bonsai hellobonsai.com0%3874,00027,918

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 15 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (capterra.com, pandadoc.com, proposify.com, zapier.com). The first result for “best proposal software” is grantbite.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best proposal software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which sales proposal and quote document tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top proposal tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best proposal software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a proposal software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which proposal tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5PandaDoc
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify, Qwilr
ProposifyChanged
Three alternativesBidsketch, PandaDoc, Quotient
Better Proposals, Prospero
Three alternativesProposable, Proposify, Qwilr
Canva, Google Docs/Sheets
Two alternativesPandaDoc, Proposify
no first choiceagainst: Anchor, Bidsketch, Proposify
GPT-5.4 miniPandaDoc
Four alternativesGetAccept, Ignition, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDocHeld
Two alternativesProposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, Google Docs + e-signature tool, Microsoft Word, Qwilr
against: Proposify
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashPandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, GetAccept, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDocHeld
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, HubSpot Sales Hub, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr
Prospero
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Two alternativesLoopio, Responsive
against: Conga Composer, Loopio, Microsoft Word, Responsive, Salesforce CPQ
Perplexity SonarPandaDoc
Two alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify
PandaDocHeld
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify, QuoteWerks, Quotient
PandaDoc
Five alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr
against: Jotform
PandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, Plutio, Zoho Invoice
no first choicenothing named
Grok 4.20PandaDoc
Five alternativesBonsai, FreshBooks, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr
against: Conga Composer, DocuSign CLM
PandaDocHeld
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, HubSpot Quote Software, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, Proposify, Qwilr
against: Responsive
PandaDoc
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, FreshBooks, Proposify
no first choiceagainst: Ignition, PandaDoc, Proposify
Mistral SmallPandaDoc
Two alternativesHoneyBook, Proposify
PandaDocHeld
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, DealHub, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Six alternativesBetter Proposals, GetAccept, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr, Revv
PandaDoc
Two alternativesHoneyBook, Proposify
DocuSign, PandaDoc
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify, Qwilr
against: Better Proposals, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify
DeepSeek V4 FlashPandaDoc
Two alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify
against: Qwilr
PandaDocHeld
Two alternativesProposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Five alternativesBonsai, HoneyBook, Nusii, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, Jotform
against: Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc, Proposify
One alternativeQwilr
against: Responsive, XaitPorter
against: Better Proposals, Ignition, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive
Llama 4 MaverickPandaDocPandaDoc, Proposify, QwilrChangedno first choicePandaDoc
Two alternativesIdeagen Huddle, Proposify
no first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Qwen 3.7 FlashPandaDoc
Three alternativesDocuSign Quote, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDocHeld
Two alternativesHoneyBook, Proposify
PandaDoc
Five alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, Dubsado, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Two alternativesBetter Proposals, HoneyBook
against: Canva, DocuSign
PandaDoc
Six alternativesHelloBonsai, HoneyBook, Loopio, Proposify, Qwilr, Upland Qvidian
against: Salesforce CPQ
against: Adobe Acrobat Writer, MS Word, Salesforce
Kimi K2Better Proposals, PandaDoc
Two alternativesGetAccept, Qwilr
Better Proposals, PandaDocHeld
Two alternativesBonsai, Proposify
Better Proposals, PandaDoc
Two alternativesProposify, Qwilr
against: Bonsai
Prospero
Four alternativesBonsai, DocHipo, HoneyBook, Jotform
no first choiceagainst: Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Responsive, Upland Qvidian
GLM 4.7 FlashXPandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDocHeld
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Six alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, GetAccept, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr
Better Proposals
Two alternativesPandaDoc, Proposify
no first choiceagainst: Canva, Jotform, Proposify
MiniMax M2.5PandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, FreshBooks, Proposify, QuoteWerks
PandaDocHeld
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify, QuoteWerks
FreshBooks
Seven alternativesBetter Proposals, GetAccept, HoneyBook, Loopio, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Better Proposals
Three alternativesBidsketch, Jotform, PandaDoc
no first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Buildertrend, HoneyBook, Proposify
GPT-6 LunaPandaDoc
Two alternativesProposify, Qwilr
PandaDocHeld
One alternativeQwilr
Nusii
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, HoneyBook, PandaDoc, Qwilr
against: Proposify
Better Proposals
One alternativePandaDoc
no first choiceagainst: PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr, Scale
Muse Glimmer 30BPandaDoc
Four alternativesBetter Proposals, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDocHeld
Three alternativesBetter Proposals, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Five alternativesBetter Proposals, Bonsai, HoneyBook, Proposify, Qwilr
PandaDoc
Three alternativesBidsketch, Jotform, Prospero
no first choiceagainst: Better Proposals, Ignition, PandaDoc, Proposify, Qwilr
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:27yes107 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:06yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:23yes920 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:26yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:14yes57 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:19yes54 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:51yes2518 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:57yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:29no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:57yes1434 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:13yes1836 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:38yes514 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 15:27yes312 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:00yes1315 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:57yes97 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:01yes45 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:45no012 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:04yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:07yes58 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:01yes57 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:16yes1920 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:53yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:57yes523 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:03yes1524 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:45yes1946 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:48yes515 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:34yes211 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:02yes1217 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:09yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:55yes45 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:44yes719 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:06yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 17:09yes514 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:40yes55 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:08yes2525 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:34yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:37yes517 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:25yes957 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:36yes2531 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:30yes1470 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:54yes617 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 17:29yes1521 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:20no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:31no05 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:18yes1018 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:39yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:17yes58 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:19yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:39yes2220 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:51yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:50yes1024 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:09yes1027 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:42yes1949 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:41yes511 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:32yes210 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:44yes1116 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:17no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:18no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:31no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 17:06yes105 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:52yes512 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:04no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:53yes1831 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:17yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:22no028 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:14yes1423 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:17no054 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:24no068 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:27yes112 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:47yes1413 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:56yes1710 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:35yes66 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:05yes722 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:11yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:28yes1515 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:02yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:19yes2431 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 13:32yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:54no027 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:02yes2554 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:25yes2150 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:43yes1039 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:14yes319 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:08yes1320 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Conga read as Conga Composer
Unresolved, counted raw
Adobe Acrobat Writer
Billdu
Buildertrend
DocuSign CPQ
DocuSign Quote
Google Docs + e-signature tool
Google Docs or Microsoft Word + Templates
Google Docs/Sheets
HelloBonsai
HubSpot Quote Software
Ideagen Huddle
Looch
MS Word
Salesforce
Super Proposal
Vertex42
Wave Accounting
Zoho
pdfFiller
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← PIMCommissions →