Twelve of fourteen models named DealHub first on the direct prompt; zero named HubSpot Commerce Hub. DealHub was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and HubSpot Commerce Hub by twelve and DealHub carries 55 labels and HubSpot Commerce Hub 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in six categories this edition.
By HubSpot, Cambridge, United States, founded 2006. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the CPQ page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, DealHub and HubSpot Commerce Hub were named in the same answer forty-eight times, of the 192 answers naming DealHub and the 72 naming HubSpot Commerce Hub. In those answers HubSpot Commerce Hub took the first choice six times and DealHub fifteen.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Rising complaints in 2024–2025: HubSpot integration is weak... Expensive” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“some users find it lacking in flexibility or scalability” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“Modern Mid-Market & Scale-Up Leaders: DealHub.io, Logik.io, Subskribe, Cacheflow, PandaDoc (for simpler CPQ needs). Pros: Faster time-to-value, lower admin overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“DealHub is the top pick for mid-market B2B SaaS, rated #1 on G2 (4.7/5 across 833 reviews) with no-code RevOps ownership.” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“The best configure, price, quote tool for a mid-sized B2B company is DealHub, as it is the top pick for mid-market B2B SaaS” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“at $85/user/month, it's at the top end of a "limited budget" for a small team. Use only if you already have HubSpot.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Start with PandaDoc ($49/user/month) or HubSpot Revenue Hub ($85/user/month)” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best CPQ option is usually HubSpot CPQ” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“HubSpot Revenue Hub wins for teams already on HubSpot CRM, with CPQ built directly into the deal record” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.