Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Automation & iPaaS › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Workflow automation and iPaaS for small business buyers

Asked as “workflow automation and integration platform”, and as “iPaaS”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 57 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
42%
Clear leader
42Zapier37Make07ONES.com14others

42% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Zapier (42%) replaces Make (44% then, 37% now), 5 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Zapier leads at 42%, replacing Make, which led at 44% and stands at 37% now: 5 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Zapier42%22%77endorsed leader▲+4Since October 2026: 38% → 42%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.38% → 42%
02Make37%9%74endorsed leader▼−7Since October 2026: 44% → 37%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.44% → 37%
03ONES.com7%0%16accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 0% → 7%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 7%
04n8n5%11%63accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
05Celigo5%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.5% → 5%
06Monday.com2%0%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
07ClickUp2%0%17accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11Workato0%88%25criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Microsoft Power Automate0%18%50accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
09Pipedream0%13%15accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10HubSpot Operations Hub0%0%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-one head-to-head pages: the top seven products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Zapier42%
02Make37%
03ONES.com7%
04n8n5%
05Celigo5%
06Monday.com2%
07ClickUp2%
08Microsoft Power Automate0%
09Pipedream0%
10HubSpot Operations Hub0%
11Workato0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Zapier
22%
17 of 77 labels negative · 12 of 14 models
“Caution: Pricing unpredictability ... Good for simple, low-volume connections, but budget carefully for growth.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Workato
88%
22 of 25 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“That pricing and governance model is not sensible for a small business that just wants a few app-to-app handoffs.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Microsoft Power Automate
18%
9 of 50 labels negative · 9 of 14 models
“use rigid rule-based automation with significant limitations: vendor lock-in, fragmented citizen developer solutions, and poor scalability” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
Make
9%
7 of 74 labels negative · 7 of 14 models
“Strong contender for SMBs with moderate automation needs, but evaluate pricing at scale and compare with alternatives.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

67 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 739 links across 223 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · ONES.com42 answers · 196 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Zapier24 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Make22 answers · 25 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Stepper14 answers · 18 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra13 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
vendor site · CloudTalk10 answers · 10 citations · 7 models
vendor site · n8n9 answers · 10 citations · 5 models
9 answers · 9 citations · 7 models
8 answers · 14 citations · 4 models
vendor site · Albato8 answers · 8 citations · 6 models
vendor site · Dialaxy7 answers · 7 citations · 5 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workflow automation and integration platform”, “workflow automation and integration platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 days
Zapier zapier.com42%222165,0002,1457,333,309$230120
Make make.com37%165135,00012,939,045439,03176
ONES.com ones.com7%281,3000145,123
n8n n8n.io5%127165,0002,786133,59942
Celigo celigo.com5%395,4001409,670$1,09743
Monday.com monday.com2%9874,0003,467691,961$164119
ClickUp clickup.com2%159201,0001,733322,021$1,470120
Microsoft parent site
Microsoft Power Automate 0%
0%1392,240,000403,136
Pipedream pipedream.com0%19
HubSpot parent site
HubSpot Operations Hub 0%
0%96368,0009,776

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 0 of them are among the sites the models cited here. The first result for “best workflow automation and integration platform” is useparagon.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which iPaaS would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top workflow automation and integration platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workflow automation and integration platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a workflow automation and integration platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workflow automation and integration platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Zapier
Four alternativesMake, Pabbly Connect, Workato, n8n
ZapierHeld
Two alternativesMake, Tray.ai
against: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Workato
Make, Zapier
Four alternativesAirtable, Microsoft Power Automate, ONES.com, n8n
Zapier
Three alternativesMake, Pabbly Connect, n8n
no first choiceagainst: IFTTT, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
GPT-5.4 miniZapier
Three alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
CeligoChanged
Two alternativesBoomi Enterprise Platform, Zapier
against: MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Workato
Zapier
Three alternativesMake, Pipedream, n8n
Zapier
Two alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate
no first choiceagainst: Appian, Microsoft Power Automate, Salesforce/MuleSoft-style enterprise automation, Zapier
Gemini 3.5 FlashMake
Two alternativesZapier, n8n
against: Tray.ai, Workato
MakeHeld
Two alternativesCeligo, Zapier
against: Dell Boomi, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Workato
Zapier
Four alternativesActivepieces, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
Make
Two alternativesPabbly Connect, n8n
against: Zapier
Make, n8n
One alternativePipedream
against: Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier
against: Activepieces, Dell Boomi, IBM App Connect, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, TIBCO Cloud Integration, Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Perplexity SonarZapier
Six alternativesBoomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Prismatic, Zoho Flow
against: Workato
ZapierHeld
Three alternativesCeligo, Make, n8n
against: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Workato
Make, Zapier
Six alternativesAsana, ClickUp, HubSpot Operations Hub, Microsoft Power Automate, Monday.com, n8n
Make
Two alternativesZapier, n8n
no first choiceagainst: GoHighLevel, Kissflow, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Workato, Zapier, n8n
Grok 4.20Zapier
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Pabbly Connect, n8n
against: Workato
ZapierHeld
Three alternativesCeligo, Make, n8n
against: Workato
Zapier
Three alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
n8n
Four alternativesActivepieces, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
against: Tray.ai, Workato
Zapier
Five alternativesClickUp, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Monday.com, n8n
against: Camunda, Oracle Integration Cloud, Workato
against: Automate.io, Automation Anywhere, IFTTT, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, UiPath, Workato, Zapier, airSlate
Mistral SmallZapier
Three alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
no first choiceChangedZapier
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, ONES.com, n8n
Make, Zapier
Three alternativesONES.com, Pipedream, n8n
no first choice
Five alternativesAirtable, Make, Monday.com, Zapier, n8n
against: Tray.ai, Workato
against: Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Workato
DeepSeek V4 FlashMake
Two alternativesZapier, n8n
CeligoChanged
Three alternativesBabelway, Make, Zapier
Zapier
Five alternativesIntegrately, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Pipedream, n8n
Make
One alternativen8n
against: Zapier
Zapier
Six alternativesAsana, ClickUp, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Monday.com, n8n
against: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Microsoft Power Automate, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Tray.ai, Workato, Zapier
Llama 4 MaverickMake, ONES.com, Zapierno first choiceChangedno first choiceMonday.com
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
ONES.com
Five alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Pipefy, Zapier, n8n
against: Workato
Qwen 3.7 FlashMake
Three alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
ZapierChanged
Two alternativesMake, Pipedream
Make, Zapier
Two alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, n8n
Make
Four alternativesActivepieces, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
Make, Zapier
Two alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, n8n
against: Dell Boomi, Make, ServiceNow MuleSoft, Zapier
Kimi K2Make
Two alternativesZapier, n8n
MakeHeld
Two alternativesZapier, n8n
Zapier
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Zoho Flow, n8n
Make
One alternativen8n
against: Zapier
ClickUp
Four alternativesKissflow, Make, Monday.com, Zapier
against: Make, Zapier, n8n
GLM 4.7 FlashXZapier
Four alternativesClickUp, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
Celigo, ZapierChanged
Three alternativesAlbato, Linx, Workato
Zapier
Seven alternativesAirtable, ClickUp, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Monday.com, ONES.com, n8n
Make, ONES.com
Two alternativesStepper, n8n
against: Zapier
no first choiceagainst: Workatoagainst: Make, Zapier, n8n
MiniMax M2.5Zapier
Four alternativesAlbato, HubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Microsoft Power Automate
ZapierHeld
Three alternativesHubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Microsoft Power Automate
Make, Zapier
Three alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, ONES.com, n8n
Make, Zapier
Three alternativesClickUp, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
no first choiceagainst: Appian, Microsoft Power Automate, Pega, ServiceNow Flow Designer, Zapier, n8n
GPT-6 LunaZapier
Three alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
MakeChanged
Two alternativesCeligo, Zapier
Zapier
Three alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, n8n
against: Pipedream
Make
Three alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
no first choiceagainst: Workatoagainst: IFTTT, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
Muse Glimmer 30BMake, Zapier
Three alternativesMicrosoft Power Automate, Monday.com, n8n
ZapierChanged
Four alternativesAPPSeCONNECT, Make, Pipedream, n8n
against: Celigo, Workato
ONES.com
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
Make, n8nagainst: ZapierONES.com
Four alternativesMake, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier, n8n
against: Automation Anywhere, Boomi Enterprise Platform, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform, Pipedream, UiPath, Workato, n8n
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:55no06 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:10yes44 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:00no013 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:10yes105 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:51yes1012 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 14:02yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:29yes2339 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:58yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:29no027 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:37yes1537 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:47yes1519 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:38yes517 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:10yes417 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:01yes1519 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:42no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:30yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:45no011 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:21yes104 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:58yes59 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:14no01 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:21yes2320 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:55yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:47no029 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:07yes1524 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:37yes1017 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:43no012 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:22yes314 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:27yes1422 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:16yes99 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:44yes67 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:29yes722 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:37yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:01yes1017 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:55yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:58yes1930 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:25yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:07yes531 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:11yes2040 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:14yes1976 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 17:04yes520 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:53yes620 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:10yes1527 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 17:13no05 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:40yes47 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:06yes1224 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:13yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:04yes1017 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:45yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:22yes2530 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:49yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:42yes518 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:10yes1021 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 15:33yes2526 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:00yes535 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 16:24yes412 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:38yes1520 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:59no06 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 16:51no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:15no016 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:13yes107 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:51yes512 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:49no07 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 16:20yes2041 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:24yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:20no033 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:21yes919 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:51no027 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:26no058 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:10yes525 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:25yes1418 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:01yes2912 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:20yes36 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:40no019 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:06yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:39yes1054 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:24yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:02yes2535 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:52yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:55yes1027 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:44yes2537 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:49yes2575 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 13:21yes2560 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:20yes514 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:09yes1935 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Boomi read as Boomi Enterprise Platform
HubSpot read as HubSpot Operations Hub
HubSpot Data Hub read as HubSpot Operations Hub
MuleSoft read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
MuleSoft (Anypoint Platform) read as MuleSoft Anypoint Platform
Oracle read as Oracle Integration Cloud
ServiceNow read as ServiceNow Flow Designer
Unresolved, counted raw
Babelway
Linx
MindCloud
Parabola
Salesforce
Salesforce/MuleSoft-style enterprise automation
ServiceNow MuleSoft
TIBCO Cloud Integration
Talend Application Integration
Workera
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Web analyticsAffiliate →