Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Automation & iPaaS › Make vs Boomi Enterprise Platform
Workflow automation and iPaaS · November 2026 Edition

Make vs Boomi Enterprise Platform

One of fourteen models named Make first on the direct prompt; zero named Boomi Enterprise Platform. Make was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Boomi Enterprise Platform by thirteen and Make carries 63 labels and Boomi Enterprise Platform 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Make

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Boomi Enterprise Platform

accepted challenger

By Dell Boomi, Chesterbrook. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share24%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels6335A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Make reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Workato was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Workato vs Make · Workato vs Boomi Enterprise Platform · Make vs Celigo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MakeFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoomi Enterprise Platform
Direct101 against Make · 1 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Paraphrase012 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Comparative20
Budget-constrained120
Scale-constrained011 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Negative1011 against Make · 4 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Make and Boomi Enterprise Platform were named in the same answer forty-three times, of the 199 answers naming Make and the 78 naming Boomi Enterprise Platform. In those answers Boomi Enterprise Platform took the first choice two times and Make zero.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Make and Boomi Enterprise Platform stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Make Boomi Enterprise Platform first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Make on the left and Boomi Enterprise Platform on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Make and Boomi Enterprise Platform stood in it.

Make first, Boomi Enterprise Platform not the choice

1 of 14 modelsBoomi Enterprise Platform was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
MiniMax M2.5Make, Zapier alternatives: SnapLogic, Workato

Neither was the first choice, one was named

12 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Workato, Zapier
GPT-5.4 miniWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Zapier
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, n8n
Perplexity SonarWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Cleo Integration Cloud, Jitterbit Harmony, Microsoft Power Automate
Grok 4.20Workato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
Mistral SmallWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
DeepSeek V4 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, Tray.ai, Zapier, n8n
Llama 4 MaverickWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Kye, Make, ServiceNow Flow Designer, SnapLogic, Zapier
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkato alternatives: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
Kimi K2Zapier alternatives: HubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Tray.ai, Workato
GLM 4.7 FlashXWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
Muse Glimmer 30BWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Make, Zapier

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-6 LunaWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Make leads by thirty-seven points.
Make37%#2 of 11
Boomi Enterprise Platform0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Make leads by twenty points.
Make24%#2 of 11
Boomi Enterprise Platform4%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Boomi Enterprise Platform leads at enterprise.
Boomi Enterprise Platform9%#4 of 15
Make2%#7 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Make

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“tools not suitable for enterprise-scale automation due to their consumer/SMB focus” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Make (formerly Integromat) stands out as the best overall workflow automation and integration platform for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Make (formerly Integromat) is generally considered the best overall balance of price and power for most small businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Zapier or Make are the strongest starting points due to their balance of usability, integration breadth, and scalability” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Boomi Enterprise Platform

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Platforms to Avoid for Mid-Market: Boomi | Historically IT-heavy” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“lack the massive IT budget or dedicated developer bandwidth required to maintain heavy enterprise legacy middleware like MuleSoft or Boomi” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise integration iPaaS (Celigo, Boomi, MuleSoft) | OAuth flows that don't enforce per-app scopes or isolation can enable COAT/CORF.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Boomi for the best balance of capability, maturity, and mid-market fit.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Workato or Boomi” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Boomi lives in the mid-market iPaaS band where use cases typically involve connecting ERP, HRIS, and CRM systems” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.