Workato vs Make
Eleven of fourteen models named Workato first on the direct prompt; one named Make. Both were named by all fourteen models and Workato carries 59 labels and Make 63, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in nine categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.
By framing
WorkatoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMake
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Workato and Make were named in the same answer ninety-six times, of the 174 answers naming Workato and the 199 naming Make. In those answers Make took the first choice seven times and Workato twenty-four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | | |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Workato Make first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workato on the left and Make on the right.The direct prompt
Workato first, Make an alternative
11 of 14 modelsMake was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Make first, Workato an alternative
1 of 14 modelsWorkato was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Make37%#2 of 11Workato0%#11 of 11Workato35%#1 of 11Make24%#2 of 11What the models said about Workato
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Low-code/no-code automation platforms (Zapier, Make, Workato, Power Automate, etc.) ... a compromised app can read/write data on your behalf.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“it's expensive, complex for smaller teams, and overkill for simple automations. Caution if you're not at enterprise level” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Workato as the primary choice due to its excellent balance of features, ease of use, connector breadth, and reasonable pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The gold standard for mid-market to enterprise. Strong governance, extensive pre-built connectors, excellent environment management” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Workato ... Choose Workato if you have a mix of technical and non-technical users and need to move fast.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Make
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“tools not suitable for enterprise-scale automation due to their consumer/SMB focus” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“Make (formerly Integromat) stands out as the best overall workflow automation and integration platform for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · first choice
“Make (formerly Integromat) is generally considered the best overall balance of price and power for most small businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Zapier or Make are the strongest starting points due to their balance of usability, integration breadth, and scalability” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.