Workato vs Celigo
Eleven of fourteen models named Workato first on the direct prompt; zero named Celigo. Workato was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Celigo by thirteen and Workato carries 59 labels and Celigo 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in three categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.
By framing
WorkatoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCeligo
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Workato and Celigo were named in the same answer forty-one times, of the 174 answers naming Workato and the 44 naming Celigo. In those answers Celigo took the first choice seven times and Workato fifteen.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | ||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | ||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Workato Celigo first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Workato on the left and Celigo on the right.The direct prompt
Workato first, Celigo an alternative
11 of 14 modelsCeligo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Workato35%#1 of 11Celigo9%#3 of 11Workato43%#1 of 15Celigo0%#14 of 15What the models said about Workato
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Low-code/no-code automation platforms (Zapier, Make, Workato, Power Automate, etc.) ... a compromised app can read/write data on your behalf.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“it's expensive, complex for smaller teams, and overkill for simple automations. Caution if you're not at enterprise level” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd recommend Workato as the primary choice due to its excellent balance of features, ease of use, connector breadth, and reasonable pricing” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The gold standard for mid-market to enterprise. Strong governance, extensive pre-built connectors, excellent environment management” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: Workato ... Choose Workato if you have a mix of technical and non-technical users and need to move fast.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Celigo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Enterprise integration iPaaS (Celigo, Boomi, MuleSoft) | OAuth flows that don't enforce per-app scopes or isolation can enable COAT/CORF.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“First choice: Celigo (Integrator.io) if you want a cost-effective, mid-market iPaaS with strong ERP/CRM connectors” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Celigo - Best for mid-sized companies wanting predictable pricing and faster setup with a flat-rate model” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Celigo as the starting point” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.