Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Automation & iPaaS › Celigo vs Boomi Enterprise Platform
Workflow automation and iPaaS · November 2026 Edition

Celigo vs Boomi Enterprise Platform

Zero of fourteen models named Celigo first on the direct prompt; zero named Boomi Enterprise Platform. Celigo was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Boomi Enterprise Platform by thirteen and Celigo carries 21 labels and Boomi Enterprise Platform 35, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Celigo

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Boomi Enterprise Platform

accepted challenger

By Dell Boomi, Chesterbrook. Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share9%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#7A position in a field of 11; printed, not drawn.
Labels2135A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Celigo reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Workato was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Workato vs Celigo · Workato vs Boomi Enterprise Platform · Make vs Celigo

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CeligoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBoomi Enterprise Platform
Direct001 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Paraphrase512 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained011 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Negative001 against Celigo · 4 against Boomi Enterprise Platform
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Celigo and Boomi Enterprise Platform were named in the same answer thirty times, of the 44 answers naming Celigo and the 78 naming Boomi Enterprise Platform. In those answers Boomi Enterprise Platform took the first choice three times and Celigo five.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Celigo and Boomi Enterprise Platform stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Celigo Boomi Enterprise Platform first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Celigo on the left and Boomi Enterprise Platform on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Celigo and Boomi Enterprise Platform stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

11 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5HubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Workato, Zapier
GPT-5.4 miniWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Zapier
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, n8n
Perplexity SonarWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Cleo Integration Cloud, Jitterbit Harmony, Microsoft Power Automate
Grok 4.20Workato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
Mistral SmallWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, HubSpot Marketing Hub, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
DeepSeek V4 FlashWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Make, Tray.ai, Zapier, n8n
Llama 4 MaverickWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Kye, Make, ServiceNow Flow Designer, SnapLogic, Zapier
GLM 4.7 FlashXWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
GPT-6 LunaWorkato alternatives: Celigo, Microsoft Power Automate, Zapier
Muse Glimmer 30BWorkato alternatives: Boomi Enterprise Platform, Celigo, Make, Zapier

Neither was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Qwen 3.7 FlashWorkato alternatives: Make, Microsoft Power Automate, Tray.ai, Zapier
Kimi K2Zapier alternatives: HubSpot Operations Hub, Make, Tray.ai, Workato
MiniMax M2.5Make, Zapier alternatives: SnapLogic, Workato

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Celigo leads by five points.
Celigo5%#5 of 11
Boomi Enterprise Platform0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Celigo leads by five points.
Celigo9%#3 of 11
Boomi Enterprise Platform4%#7 of 11
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Boomi Enterprise Platform leads at enterprise.
Boomi Enterprise Platform9%#4 of 15
Celigo0%#14 of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Celigo

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Enterprise integration iPaaS (Celigo, Boomi, MuleSoft) | OAuth flows that don't enforce per-app scopes or isolation can enable COAT/CORF.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“First choice: Celigo (Integrator.io) if you want a cost-effective, mid-market iPaaS with strong ERP/CRM connectors” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Celigo - Best for mid-sized companies wanting predictable pricing and faster setup with a flat-rate model” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Celigo as the starting point” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Boomi Enterprise Platform

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Platforms to Avoid for Mid-Market: Boomi | Historically IT-heavy” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“lack the massive IT budget or dedicated developer bandwidth required to maintain heavy enterprise legacy middleware like MuleSoft or Boomi” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · soft negative
“Enterprise integration iPaaS (Celigo, Boomi, MuleSoft) | OAuth flows that don't enforce per-app scopes or isolation can enable COAT/CORF.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Start with Boomi for the best balance of capability, maturity, and mid-market fit.” GPT-5.4 mini · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Workato or Boomi” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Boomi lives in the mid-market iPaaS band where use cases typically involve connecting ERP, HRIS, and CRM systems” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.