Celigo vs Zapier
Zero of fourteen models named Celigo first on the direct prompt; two named Zapier. Celigo was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Zapier by fourteen and Celigo carries 21 labels and Zapier 69, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
United States, founded 2012. Named in fifteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the workflow automation and ipaas page.
By framing
CeligoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZapier
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Celigo and Zapier were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 44 answers naming Celigo and the 260 naming Zapier. In those answers Zapier took the first choice six times and Celigo four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | | | |
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | | |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | | |
Celigo Zapier first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Celigo on the left and Zapier on the right.The direct prompt
Zapier first, Celigo not the choice
2 of 14 modelsCeligo was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
12 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Zapier42%#1 of 11Celigo5%#5 of 11Celigo9%#3 of 11Zapier9%#4 of 11What the models said about Celigo
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Enterprise integration iPaaS (Celigo, Boomi, MuleSoft) | OAuth flows that don't enforce per-app scopes or isolation can enable COAT/CORF.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“First choice: Celigo (Integrator.io) if you want a cost-effective, mid-market iPaaS with strong ERP/CRM connectors” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Celigo - Best for mid-sized companies wanting predictable pricing and faster setup with a flat-rate model” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Celigo as the starting point” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Zapier
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Highest Caution / Often Recommended to Avoid for Most Users - Zapier: Frequently cited for poor customer support” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure no-code tools like Zapier for core B2B processes” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“For most small businesses, starting with Zapier or Make is recommended due to their flexibility and cost-effectiveness.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with: Zapier or Make for most SMBs— they're quick to implement and have vast communities.” Grok 4.20 · comparative prompt · first choice
“1. Zapier (The Popular Choice) ... Largest app catalog, easiest for non-technical users” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.