Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Session replay › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Session replay and heatmaps for enterprise buyers

Asked as “session replay and heatmap tool”, and as “website visitor behavior analytics tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the November 2026 Edition.
Standing · first-choice share
36%
Contested · Contentsquare 14%
36Fullstory14Contentsquare12Quantum Metric39others

36% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026▲+8Since October 2026: 28% → 36%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Fullstory held the lead, +8 points on 28%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Fullstory36%22%69endorsed leader▲+8Since October 2026: 28% → 36%, +8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.28% → 36%
02Contentsquare14%11%56accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 19% → 14%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.19% → 14%
03Quantum Metric12%8%39accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 8% → 12%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.8% → 12%
04Microsoft Clarity7%63%41criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 9% → 7%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.9% → 7%
05OpenReplay5%5%19accepted challenger▲+3Since October 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 5%
06Glassbox3%0%28accepted challenger▼−8Since October 2026: 11% → 3%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.11% → 3%
07LogRocket2%24%46accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
08PostHog2%17%30accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
09Amplitude Session Replay2%18%22accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
10Mouseflow2%56%16criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
11Hotjar2%62%45criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Smartlook0%64%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
A09
10
11
12
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Fullstory36%
02Contentsquare14%
03Quantum Metric12%
04Microsoft Clarity7%
05OpenReplay5%
06Glassbox3%
07LogRocket2%
08PostHog2%
09Amplitude Session Replay2%
10Mouseflow2%
11Hotjar2%
12Smartlook0%

What they warned about

Six of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Microsoft Clarity
63%
26 of 41 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 7 hard negative
“Avoid purely free/lightweight tools like Microsoft Clarity for production use—they lack mature enterprise SSO, SOC 2 depth, and dedicated support.” Grok 4.20, scale prompt
Hotjar
62%
28 of 45 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Usage-based (sessions/pageviews) or limited free tiers; they don't scale predictably or compliantly for large enterprises” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Fullstory
22%
15 of 69 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Large enterprises should avoid or be extremely cautious with tools like FullStory, Hotjar, and Smartlook” Mistral Small, negative prompt
Smartlook
64%
9 of 14 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Smartlook is flagged in alternatives coverage as in Cisco end-of-sale and among tools "no longer safe picks in 2026"” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

74 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 913 links across 231 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 9 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · LogRocket35 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Quantum Metric34 answers · 66 citations · 13 models
vendor site · Contentsquare27 answers · 39 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Userpilot24 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Fullstory22 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Amplitude20 answers · 33 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Zapier20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · OpenReplay19 answers · 37 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
17 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 22 citations · 7 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best session replay and heatmap tool”, “session replay and heatmap tool”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Fullstory fullstory.com36%2175,400159141,869$34814
Contentsquare contentsquare.com
Contentsquare 14%, Hotjar 2%
15%2879,900226149,92586
Quantum Metric quantummetric.com12%731,900716,885486
Microsoft clarity.microsoft.com
Microsoft Clarity 7%
7%2192,240,000403,13644,297
OpenReplay openreplay.com5%375905185,076
Glassbox glassbox.com3%646,6001619,0820
Adobe parent site
Adobe Analytics 3%
3%1981,220,000117,563
LogRocket logrocket.com2%1203,60083252,22211
PostHog posthog.com2%42033,10027125,936120
Amplitude amplitude.com
Amplitude Session Replay 2%
2%4074,0005,691373,273$20727

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 17 sites; 1 of them are among the sites the models cited here (quantummetric.com). The first result for “best session replay and heatmap tool” is learn.g2.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best session replay and heatmap tool for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which website visitor behavior analytics tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade session replay and heatmap tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best session replay and heatmap tool for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a session replay and heatmap tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which session replay and heatmap tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Fullstory, Quantum Metric
Two alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox
FullstoryChanged
Three alternatives6sense, Demandbase, ZoomInfo
Quantum Metric
Six alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Glassbox
Two alternativesContentsquare, Quantum Metric
against: Fullstory
no first choiceagainst: LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
GPT-5.4 miniContentsquare
Three alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket
against: Microsoft Clarity
ContentsquareHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Analytics, Fullstory
Contentsquare
Three alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Mouseflow, Smartlook
Mouseflow
One alternativeContentsquare
against: Microsoft Clarity
no first choiceagainst: Contentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, Inspectlet, Smartlook
Gemini 3.5 FlashFullstory
Three alternativesContentsquare, LogRocket, PostHog
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
FullstoryHeld
Five alternatives6sense, Amplitude Session Replay, Contentsquare, Demandbase, Mixpanel
against: Google Analytics 4, Hotjar
Contentsquare
Four alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
Microsoft Clarity
Three alternativesOpenReplay, PostHog, Quantum Metric
against: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
Fullstory
Four alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, PostHog
against: Crazy Egg, Hotjar, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, OpenReplay, PostHog
Perplexity SonarFullstory
Four alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Contentsquare, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Microsoft Clarity
FullstoryHeld
Four alternativesDealfront Leadfeeder, Google Analytics 4, ZoomInfo, ZoomInfo WebSights
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Fullstory
Seven alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Contentsquare, Glassbox, Heap, LogRocket, PostHog, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Glassbox
One alternativeContentsquare
against: Datadog Session Replay, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, Smartlook
Grok 4.20Fullstory
Three alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Contentsquare, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Sentry
Adobe AnalyticsChanged
Eight alternativesContentsquare, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Hotjar, Matomo, Microsoft Clarity, Mixpanel, Piwik PRO
Fullstory
Five alternativesAdobe Experience Cloud, Contentsquare, Dynatrace, Glassbox, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity
Quantum Metric
One alternativeContentsquare
against: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, PostHog
Fullstory
Three alternativesContentsquare, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
against: Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, Inspectlet, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, SessionCam, Smartlook
Mistral SmallFullstory, Quantum Metric
Three alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket
Google Analytics 360Changed
Four alternatives6sense, Dealfront, HubSpot, Salespanel
Quantum Metric
Six alternativesContentsquare, Dynatrace, Fullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket, PostHog
PostHogagainst: Fullstory, Quantum MetricFullstory
One alternativePostHog
against: Crazy Egg, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
against: Contentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, Smartlook
DeepSeek V4 FlashFullstory, Quantum Metric
Three alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket
ContentsquareChanged
Five alternatives6sense, Adobe Analytics, Demandbase, Fullstory, Google Analytics 360
Fullstory
Five alternativesContentsquare, Datadog Session Replay, Glassbox, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Hotjar
Microsoft Clarity
Three alternativesFullstory, OpenReplay, Quantum Metric
against: LogRocket, Mixpanel, PostHog
Fullstory
Four alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, OpenReplay
against: Microsoft Clarity, Quantum Metric
against: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Smartlook
Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceClicsChanged
Three alternativesDealfront, HubSpot, Microsoft Clarity
Crazy Egg
Two alternativesHotjar, Lucky Orange
Crazy EggOpenReplay, UXCam
One alternativeCrazy Egg
against: Contentsquare, Hotjar, Quantum Metric
Qwen 3.7 FlashFullstory
Three alternativesHotjar, LogRocket, PostHog
against: Microsoft Clarity
FullstoryHeld
Two alternativesAdobe Analytics, Heap
Fullstory
Four alternativesContentsquare, LogRocket, PostHog, Quantum Metric
Quantum Metric
Three alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar
against: Datadog Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, New Relic
no first choiceagainst: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Kimi K2Fullstory, LogRocket
Two alternativesContentsquare, Quantum Metric
6sense, DemandbaseChanged
Two alternativesAdobe Analytics, Contentsquare
against: Google Analytics 360, Google Analytics 4
Fullstory, Quantum Metric
Three alternativesContentsquare, Hotjar, LogRocket
Amplitude Session Replay
Two alternativesFullstory, Mouseflow
against: Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Pendo
Quantum Metric
Three alternativesFullstory, Glassbox, OpenReplay
against: Hotjar, Smartlook
against: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
GLM 4.7 FlashXContentsquare, Fullstory
Four alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, LogRocket, OpenReplay, PostHog
Adobe AnalyticsChanged
Three alternativesAmplitude Session Replay, Google Analytics 4, Matomo
Contentsquare, Fullstory
Six alternativesDatadog Session Replay, Hotjar, LogRocket, Mouseflow, PostHog, Smartlook
Contentsquare
Two alternativesMicrosoft Clarity, PostHog
against: Fullstory
OpenReplayagainst: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
MiniMax M2.5Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Three alternativesCensus, Fullstory, LogRocket
ContentsquareChanged
Three alternativesAdobe Analytics, Fullstory, Heap
Contentsquare, Fullstory
Eight alternativesDynatrace, Glassbox, LogRocket, Lucky Orange, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, PostHog, Quantum Metric
OpenReplay
Two alternativesPostHog, Umami
against: Amplitude Session Replay, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Fullstory
Three alternativesHotjar, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
against: Crazy Egg, Smartlook
against: Contentsquare, Crazy Egg, Fullstory, Hotjar, Inspectlet, Mouseflow
GPT-6 LunaFullstory
Two alternativesContentsquare, LogRocket
FullstoryHeld
One alternativeContentsquare
Contentsquare, Fullstory, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
One alternativeGlassbox
against: Amplitude Session Replay
Microsoft Clarity
One alternativeContentsquare
no first choice
Four alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Glassbox, LogRocket
against: Amplitude Session Replay, Grafana Cloud Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity
Muse Glimmer 30BContentsquare
Three alternativesFullstory, Hotjar, Quantum Metric
ContentsquareHeld
One alternativeFullstory
Contentsquare, Fullstory
Six alternativesDecibel Insight, Dynatrace, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket, Quantum Metric
Fullstory, Pendo Session Replay, Quantum Metricagainst: Contentsquare, Hotjar, PostHogno first choiceagainst: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow, Smartlook
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:03yes108 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:17yes26 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:03no014 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:52yes104 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:19yes1412 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:17yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:59yes1823 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 17:30yes54 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:40yes522 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 14:26yes1017 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 16:16yes2566 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:15no036 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:34yes419 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:19yes1322 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:12yes108 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:22yes35 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:29no013 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:19yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:33yes511 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:14yes55 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:20yes2523 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:03yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:01no030 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 17:01yes1851 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:54yes924 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:47yes522 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:57yes315 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:06yes1520 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:16yes1011 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:05yes410 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:49no018 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:54yes106 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:16yes515 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:23yes1514 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:37yes2343 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:37yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:44yes527 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:20yes1835 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:12yes24115 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:22yes1020 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:43yes621 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:27yes2032 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:54yes157 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:34yes213 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:34yes825 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:21yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:29yes1918 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 15:30yes2017 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:20yes2326 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:31yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 14:45yes1536 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 13:04yes2591 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:57yes2272 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:02yes22101 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:57yes316 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 13:41yes2137 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:51no08 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:03yes18 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 16:16no020 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:37yes107 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:35yes1319 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:54no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:08yes2450 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:22yes54 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:38no030 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:23yes2435 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:03yes1438 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:54no024 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 13:17yes429 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:01yes1223 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:50yes1712 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:05yes38 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:25yes626 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 08:50yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:59yes1816 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:00yes1511 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 14:53yes2533 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 16:59yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 15:52yes2446 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 15:57yes2553 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:01yes24109 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:53yes1453 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:51yes323 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:27yes1832 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Amplitude read as Amplitude Session Replay
Datadog read as Datadog Session Replay
Unresolved, counted raw
Datadog RUM
Datadog RUM / LogRocket Enterprise
Dealfront Leadfeeder
Formisimo
Grafana Cloud Session Replay
IBM Tealeaf
Pendo Session Replay
Replay
Sentry Replay
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Product analyticsTag management →