Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Session replay › PostHog vs Contentsquare
Session replay and heatmaps · November 2026 Edition

PostHog vs Contentsquare

Two of fourteen models named PostHog first on the direct prompt; zero named Contentsquare. PostHog was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Contentsquare by thirteen and PostHog carries 37 labels and Contentsquare 30, so the shares are not directly comparable.

PostHog

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Contentsquare

accepted challenger

Paris, France, founded 2008. Named in seven categories this edition.

First-choice share6%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels3730A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, PostHog reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Clarity was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Clarity vs PostHog · Microsoft Clarity vs Contentsquare · Hotjar vs PostHog

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the session replay and heatmaps page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PostHogFirst choices, of fourteen modelsContentsquare
Direct203 against Contentsquare
Paraphrase112 against Contentsquare
Comparative011 against Contentsquare
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative101 against Contentsquare
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, PostHog and Contentsquare were named in the same answer eighty-nine times, of the 486 answers naming PostHog and the 199 naming Contentsquare. In those answers Contentsquare took the first choice seven times and PostHog seven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where PostHog and Contentsquare stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
PostHog Contentsquare first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, PostHog on the left and Contentsquare on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where PostHog and Contentsquare stood in it.

PostHog first, Contentsquare not the choice

2 of 14 modelsContentsquare was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Kimi K2PostHog alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
Mistral SmallHotjar alternatives: Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Qwen 3.7 FlashLogRocket alternatives: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Clarity alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, UXCam
GPT-6 LunaFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, PostHog
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Hotjar, Mouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity
Perplexity SonarHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Grok 4.20Hotjar alternatives: Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
DeepSeek V4 FlashHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Llama 4 MaverickMouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, UXCam
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Clarity alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
PostHog leads by four points.
PostHog4%#3 of 11
Contentsquare0%#10 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
PostHog leads by four points.
PostHog6%#5 of 16
Contentsquare2%#8 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Contentsquare leads at enterprise.
Contentsquare14%#2 of 12
PostHog2%#8 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about PostHog

No label in this category carried a quote.

What the models said about Contentsquare

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Avoid overly enterprise tools like Contentsquare unless you have very high traffic/budgets.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Instead of buying an expensive enterprise platform (like full Contentsquare or Quantum Metric which can run $30k–$50k+/year)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“warned about common misreading errors (cherry-picking, streetlight effects) that can lead to misleading conclusions” Mistral Small · negative prompt · soft negative
“My default pick: Contentsquare Growth for a mid-sized B2B company” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best enterprise suite: Contentsquare” GPT-5.4 mini · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose Contentsquare, Glassbox, or Quantum Metric when scale, enterprise governance, and advanced experience analytics justify a larger platform.” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.