Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Product analytics › Enterprise · November 2026 Edition

Product analytics for enterprise buyers

Asked as “product analytics platform”, and as “product analytics tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
61%
Clear leader
61Amplitude22Mixpanel06GrowthBook11others

61% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+5Since October 2026: 56% → 61%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.Amplitude held the lead, +5 points on 56%, inside the 11-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Amplitude61%16%76endorsed leader▲+5Since October 2026: 56% → 61%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.56% → 61%
02Mixpanel22%20%75accepted challenger▲+9Since October 2026: 13% → 22%, +9 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.13% → 22%
03Pendo6%8%59accepted challenger▼−12Since October 2026: 18% → 6%, −12 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement.18% → 6%
04GrowthBook6%0%13accepted challenger▲+6Since October 2026: 0% → 6%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 6%
05PostHog4%17%52accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.2% → 4%
Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09Google Analytics 4 Lab in the set0%93%14criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
08Heap0%35%37criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
07Fullstory0%12%16accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
06Contentsquare0%5%21accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Analytics 4 is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative80%
Key
01Amplitude61%
02Mixpanel22%
03Pendo6%
04GrowthBook6%
05PostHog4%
06Contentsquare0%
07Fullstory0%
08Heap0%
09Google Analytics 40%

What they warned about

Eleven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Google Analytics 4
93%
13 of 14 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“Why to avoid: While GA4 is ubiquitous in marketing departments, using free GA4 as a product analytics platform for enterprise web/mobile applications leads to severe friction.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Mixpanel
20%
15 of 75 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid standard event-based pricing (like Mixpanel's per-event model) for large-scale deployments” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Heap
35%
13 of 37 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Platforms to Be Cautious About or Potentially Avoid ... Heap ... often leads to noisy, untrustworthy data at enterprise scale” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Amplitude
16%
12 of 76 labels negative · 10 of 14 models
“Watch out: MTU-based pricing can be expensive for products with many low-engagement users." ... "Mixpanel and Amplitude become unaffordable at scale.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

71 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 846 links across 237 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 39 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Mixpanel38 answers · 43 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Amplitude37 answers · 79 citations · 11 models
vendor site · GrowthBook37 answers · 42 citations · 10 models
29 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Pendo24 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · LinkedIn23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Userpilot21 answers · 24 citations · 12 models
vendor site · PostHog17 answers · 33 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Capterra17 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
publisher (Gane)15 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Gainsight13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
10 answers · 12 citations · 6 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best product analytics platform”, “product analytics platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Amplitude amplitude.com61%41874,0005,691373,273$207272
Mixpanel mixpanel.com22%46712,10045820,284$45811
Pendo pendo.io6%40912,10076119,185$3,60993
GrowthBook growthbook.io6%872,9001426,64626
PostHog posthog.com4%42033,10027125,936120
Adobe parent site
Adobe Analytics 2%, Adobe Analytics / Customer Journey Analytics 0%, Adobe Customer Journey Analytics 0%
2%1981,220,000117,563
Contentsquare contentsquare.com0%1842,900101149,92586
Fullstory fullstory.com0%2175,400159141,869$348148
Gainsight PX gainsight.com0%27260459,569589
Countly countly.com0%14

Google's top ten for the two searches hold 16 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (amplitude.com, gainsight.com, userpilot.com). The first result for “best product analytics platform” is domo.com.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best product analytics platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which product analytics tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade product analytics platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best product analytics platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a product analytics platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which product analytics platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceAmplitude, MixpanelChanged
One alternativePendo
Amplitude
Four alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Quantum Metric
Amplitude
Two alternativesMixpanel, Userpilot
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel
GPT-5.4 miniAmplitude
Three alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo
AmplitudeHeld
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude
Seven alternativesAdobe Analytics, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude
Two alternativesMixpanel, PostHog
no first choiceagainst: Mixpanel, PostHog
Gemini 3.5 FlashPendo
Three alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel, PostHog
PendoHeld
Two alternativesAmplitude, Mixpanel
Amplitude
Four alternativesContentsquare, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Mixpanel
Three alternativesKubit, PostHog, Statsig
against: Amplitude, Heap, Pendo
Amplitude
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Countly, Google Analytics 4, June, Looker, Matomo, PowerBI, Tableau, TelemetryDeck, Usermaven
Perplexity SonarAmplitude
Five alternativesCountly, Gainsight PX, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Two alternativesMixpanel, Pendo
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Six alternativesAdobe Analytics, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude
One alternativeMixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Adobe Analytics, Google Analytics 4, Heap, June, Matomo, PostHog, Userpilot
Grok 4.20Amplitude
Four alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, Pendo, PostHog
against: Google Analytics 360, Mixpanel
AmplitudeHeld
Five alternativesContentsquare, Glassbox, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Google Analytics 4
Amplitude
Six alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Adobe Analytics
Five alternativesAmplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Two alternativesPendo, PostHog
against: Heap
against: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, LiveSession, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Userpilot
Mistral SmallAmplitude, Mixpanel
Four alternativesCountly, GrowthBook, Pendo, Piwik PRO
no first choiceChangedagainst: Google Analytics 4Amplitude
Nine alternativesContentsquare, Countly, Fullstory, Gainsight PX, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, Piwik PRO, PostHog
Mixpanel
One alternativeAmplitude
against: Contentsquare, Countly, Fullstory, Quantum Metric
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Heap, Mixpanel, Nexthink, Pendo, Segment
DeepSeek V4 FlashAmplitude
Four alternativesGainsight PX, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Heap
Amplitude
Seven alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Quantum Metric
PostHog
One alternativeAmplitude
against: Mixpanel, Pendo
Amplitude, Mixpanel
One alternativePendo
against: PostHog
against: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
Llama 4 MaverickAmplitudeAmplitudeHeld
Seven alternativesFullstory, Gainsight PX, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Userpilot
no first choiceAmplitude, Mixpanelno first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel
Qwen 3.7 FlashAmplitude
Four alternativesHeap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
One alternativePendo
Amplitude
Five alternativesFullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, Snowplow
Amplitude, Mixpanel
One alternativeGrowthBook
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel
Kimi K2Amplitude
Two alternativesMixpanel, Pendo
AmplitudeHeld
One alternativePendo
Amplitude
Six alternativesAdobe Analytics, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog, Snowplow
GrowthBook
One alternativePendo
against: Amplitude, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel
GLM 4.7 FlashXAmplitude
Four alternativesContentsquare, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Two alternativesContentsquare, Pendo
no first choice
Ten alternativesAmplitude, Contentsquare, Countly, Fullstory, Glassbox, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, Piwik PRO, PostHog
GrowthBook
One alternativeAmplitude
against: Heap, Mixpanel
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Google Analytics 4, Heap, Mixpanel, PostHog
MiniMax M2.5Amplitude, Pendo
Four alternativesContentsquare, Countly, Mixpanel, PostHog
Amplitude, MixpanelChanged
Two alternativesPendo, PostHog
Amplitude
Seven alternativesAdobe Analytics / Customer Journey Analytics, Contentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Mixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
against: Google Analytics 360
GrowthBook, PostHog
One alternativePendo
no first choicenothing named
GPT-6 LunaAmplitude
Three alternativesMixpanel, Pendo, PostHog
AmplitudeHeld
Two alternativesMixpanel, Pendo
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Four alternativesAdobe Customer Journey Analytics, Contentsquare Product Analytics, Pendo, PostHog
Mixpanel
One alternativeAmplitude
against: PostHog
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Two alternativesHeap, Pendo
against: PostHog
against: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, Google Analytics 4, Mixpanel, PostHog
Muse Glimmer 30BAmplitude
Two alternativesMixpanel, Pendo
AmplitudeHeld
Two alternativesMixpanel, Pendo
Amplitude, Mixpanel
Six alternativesContentsquare, Fullstory, Heap, Pendo, PostHog, Quantum Metric
Mixpanel
Four alternativesCountly, Holistics, OpenPanel, PostHog
against: Amplitude
no first choiceagainst: Amplitude, Heap, Mixpanel
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:05no05 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 13:25yes25 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:24yes826 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 14:41yes105 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:37yes512 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 11:16yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 13:10yes2330 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 15:07yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:58yes522 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:07yes1947 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 13:13yes25123 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:19yes535 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 17:09yes417 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:02yes1116 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:24no05 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 15:51yes55 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:07no012 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:36yes106 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:05yes510 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:05no03 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:05yes2421 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:18yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:18yes1459 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:54yes1828 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:42yes19133 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:58yes520 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:43yes310 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 14:50yes1113 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:36yes1811 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:54yes910 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 17:13no019 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 15:36yes1010 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:28yes518 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 16:41yes510 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 15:22yes2331 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 14:57yes53 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:47no034 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:37yes1735 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 08:46yes2371 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 16:35yes854 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 14:39yes623 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:17yes1426 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 14:56yes188 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:07yes56 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 15:10yes924 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 13:04yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 16:42yes2416 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:21yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:20yes2533 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:27yes53 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 16:01yes547 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:40yes2278 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:41yes1916 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 14:35yes2482 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 10:55yes320 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 16:48yes1523 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 16:03yes1914 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:15no09 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 13:43no019 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:32yes108 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 15:31yes918 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 13:05no08 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:03yes2471 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 08:49yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:39no031 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 16:54yes1066 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 14:17yes14107 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 15:52no015 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:35yes430 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 08:54yes1523 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 15:40yes1610 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 14:38yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 14:46no023 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 16:43yes105 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 14:05yes1418 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:59yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:16yes2533 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:40yes53 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:51yes1446 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:34yes2579 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:34yes2351 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:47no042 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:03yes417 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 15:52yes1224 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Adobe read as Adobe Analytics
Amplitude read as Amplitude
Unresolved, counted raw
Contentsquare Product Analytics
Dataroid
Kubecost
Rittman Analytics
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Market intelligenceSession replay →