Session replay and heatmaps · November 2026 Edition
Mouseflow vs LogRocket
Two of fourteen models named Mouseflow first on the direct prompt; one named LogRocket. Both were named by all fourteen models and Mouseflow carries 31 labels and LogRocket 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate19%11%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#7A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels3137A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Mouseflow reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Microsoft Clarity was named alongside these two in eleven of the fourteen direct answers. Microsoft Clarity vs Mouseflow · Microsoft Clarity vs LogRocket · Hotjar vs Mouseflow
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the session replay and heatmaps page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
MouseflowFirst choices, of fourteen modelsLogRocket
Direct21
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative006 against Mouseflow · 4 against LogRocket
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Mouseflow and LogRocket were named in the same answer forty-seven times, of the 83 answers naming Mouseflow and the 140 naming LogRocket. In those answers LogRocket took the first choice zero times and Mouseflow zero.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Mouseflow and LogRocket stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
Mouseflow LogRocket first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Mouseflow on the left and LogRocket on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Mouseflow and LogRocket stood in it.
Mouseflow first, LogRocket not the choice
2 of 14 modelsLogRocket was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Hotjar, Mouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Microsoft Clarity
Llama 4 MaverickMouseflow alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, UXCam
LogRocket first, Mouseflow not the choice
1 of 14 modelsMouseflow was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashLogRocket alternatives: Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, Hotjar, LogRocket
Gemini 3.5 FlashPostHog alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity
Perplexity SonarHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Grok 4.20Hotjar alternatives: Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Mistral SmallHotjar alternatives: Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, PostHog
DeepSeek V4 FlashHotjar alternatives: Amplitude Session Replay, Fullstory, LogRocket, Microsoft Clarity, Mouseflow
Kimi K2PostHog alternatives: LogRocket, Mouseflow
GLM 4.7 FlashXMicrosoft Clarity alternatives: Contentsquare, Glassbox, LogRocket, UXCam
MiniMax M2.5Microsoft Clarity alternatives: Fullstory, Hotjar, LogRocket
Neither was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.GPT-6 LunaFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, PostHog
Muse Glimmer 30BFullstory alternatives: Contentsquare, Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Mouseflow0%#7 of 11LogRocket0%#8 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Mouseflow2%#10 of 12LogRocket2%#7 of 12What the models said about Mouseflow
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“groups Mouseflow, LogRocket and Smartlook together with Hotjar/Clarity/FullStory as tools that record detailed interactions and raise wiretap liability concerns” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“The risk often comes from *how* top-tier tools (like FullStory, Hotjar, Mouseflow, or Crazy Egg) are implemented” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Others in the same ecosystem: Crazy Egg, Mouseflow, Inspectlet, Lucky Orange, LogRocket (for web)... still risky” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Mouseflow appears to be the most frequently cited choice specifically for mid-market teams.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Mouseflow - Best overall for CRO, friction analysis, and GDPR compliance.” Llama 4 Maverick · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Mouseflow instead when the primary objective is optimizing lead forms, funnels, and conversion paths” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
What the models said about LogRocket
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of six in this category shown.
“text masking beyond sensitive fields may require configuration; its ability to capture application state... increases the amount of potentially sensitive data collected” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“treat Hotjar, Microsoft Clarity, FullStory, Mouseflow, LogRocket and Smartlook as high-risk” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“More developer-focused; less intuitive for non-technical marketing teams; can be overkill” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“LogRocket is widely considered the gold standard for mid-market B2B.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Product & Developer Focus | FullStory, LogRocket | Heavy on console logs, network errors, quantitative analytics + replay.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
“One More Option Worth Considering: LogRocket (from $69/month) is excellent if your B2B product is primarily web-app focused” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · alternative
Also compared
Microsoft Clarity vs MouseflowMicrosoft Clarity vs LogRocketHotjar vs MouseflowHotjar vs LogRocketDealfront vs MouseflowDealfront vs LogRocketFullstory vs MouseflowFullstory vs LogRocketPostHog vs MouseflowPostHog vs LogRocketMouseflow vs ContentsquareLogRocket vs ContentsquareAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full session replay standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.