Recruitment marketing and career sites
Asked as “recruitment marketing platform”, and as “career site builder”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
39%
Contested · Manatal 11%
39Teamtailor11Manatal09Greenhouse41others
39% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Teamtailor held the lead, +16 points on 23%, past the floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Manatal19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Manatal (19%) replaces Workable (12% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-market
Teamtailor39%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This pageEnterprise
Phenom45%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Manatal19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Manatal (19%) replaces Workable (12% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Mid-marketTeamtailor39%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.This pageEnterprisePhenom45%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Teamtailor39%0%41endorsed leader▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.23% → 39%
Teamtailor39%0%41endorsed leader▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.23% → 39%02Manatal11%0%17accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 3% → 11%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 11%
Manatal11%0%17accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 3% → 11%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 11%03
Zoho Recruit9%0%22accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%
Zoho Recruit9%0%22accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 10% → 9%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.10% → 9%04
Greenhouse9%5%20accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 9%
Greenhouse9%5%20accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 2% → 9%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 9%05
Workable7%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 7% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 7%
Workable7%5%20accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 7% → 7%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 7%06
Gem5%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%
Gem5%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 7% → 5%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 5%07
TalentLyft4%0%13accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%
TalentLyft4%0%13accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 7% → 4%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 4%08
Beamery2%14%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Beamery2%14%21accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%09
Recruitee2%0%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
Recruitee2%0%16accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%10Phenom2%33%33criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%
Phenom2%33%33criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 5% → 2%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 2%11
Lever2%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Lever2%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%12
iCIMS Attract2%22%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
iCIMS Attract2%22%18accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
17
LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%16
Radancy0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Radancy0%38%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%15
Avature0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Avature0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%13
SmartRecruiters0%13%15accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
SmartRecruiters0%13%15accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%14
Symphony Talent0%9%11accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
Symphony Talent0%9%11accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Teamtailor vs WorkableTeamtailor vs GemTeamtailor vs TalentLyftTeamtailor vs BeameryManatal vs Zoho RecruitManatal vs GreenhouseManatal vs WorkableManatal vs GemManatal vs TalentLyftManatal vs BeameryZoho Recruit vs GreenhouseZoho Recruit vs WorkableZoho Recruit vs GemZoho Recruit vs TalentLyftZoho Recruit vs BeameryGreenhouse vs WorkableGreenhouse vs GemGreenhouse vs TalentLyftGreenhouse vs BeameryWorkable vs GemWorkable vs TalentLyftWorkable vs BeameryGem vs TalentLyftGem vs BeameryTalentLyft vs Beamery
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314151617Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Teamtailor39%
Teamtailor39%02Manatal11%
Manatal11%03Zoho Recruit9%
Zoho Recruit9%04Greenhouse9%
Greenhouse9%05Workable7%
Workable7%06Gem5%
Gem5%07TalentLyft4%
TalentLyft4%08Beamery2%
Beamery2%09Recruitee2%
Recruitee2%10Phenom2%
Phenom2%11Lever2%
Lever2%12iCIMS Attract2%
iCIMS Attract2%13SmartRecruiters0%
SmartRecruiters0%14Symphony Talent0%
Symphony Talent0%15Avature0%
Avature0%16Radancy0%
Radancy0%17LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%
LinkedIn Talent Solutions0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Phenom33%
11 of 33 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid Phenom or iCIMS unless you're crossing into enterprise territory” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
iCIMS Attract22%
4 of 18 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Avoid overly complex enterprise tools (like iCIMS or Workday) that require heavy IT involvement” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
LinkedIn Talent Solutions40%
4 of 10 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“High costs for small businesses; complex, difficult setup; poor search functionality; limited number of searches on standard accounts; steep learning curve.” GLM 4.7 FlashX, negative prompt
Radancy38%
5 of 13 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Enterprise suites with opaque, custom pricing—such as Radancy, Phenom, Symphony Talent, and Eightfold: Do not buy until the vendor documents every included module” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 853 links across 239 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
35 answers · 44 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Rework31 answers · 46 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 37 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow23 answers · 26 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 22 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group16 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
15 answers · 16 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 12 models
23 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 8 models
11 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teamtailor teamtailor.com | 39% | 109 | 2,400 | 59 | 42,407 | $230 | 114 | |
| Manatal manatal.com | 11% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | 7 | |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 9% | 9% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Greenhouse greenhouse.com | 9% | 401 | 301,000 | 52,273 | 62,551 | $5,545 | 74 | |
| Workable workable.com | 7% | 332 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 | |
| Gem gem.com | 5% | 182 | 246,000 | 225,116 | 16,291 | 10 | ||
| TalentLyft talentlyft.com | 4% | 28 | 70 | 3 | 67,376 | |||
| Beamery beamery.com | 2% | 262 | 1,000 | 21 | 12,866 | 0 | ||
| Recruitee recruitee.com | 2% | 50 | 1,000 | 28 | 26,872 | 4 | ||
| Phenom phenom.com | 2% | 331 | 18,100 | 2,229 | 24,487 | 0 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (selectsoftwarereviews.com, softwareadvice.com). The first result for “best recruitment marketing platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which career site builder would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top recruitment marketing platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a recruitment marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which recruitment marketing platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Teamtailor, Workableagainst: Beamery, Phenom, RadancyiCIMS AttractChangedJoveoManatalno first choiceagainst: CareerBuilder, Monster
Two alternatives
Greenhouse, JobviteThree alternatives
MokaHR, SmartRecruiters, WorkableTen alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Loxo, Paradox, Phenom, Sense, SmartRecruiters, Symphony Talent, TalentLyft, WorkableThree alternatives
GrabJobs, TalentLyft, Zoho RecruitGPT-5.4 miniTeamtailoragainst: Avature, GemTeamtailorHeldTeamtailor, iCIMS AttractWorkableno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Jobvite, WorkableTwo alternatives
CareerPlug, GreenhouseTen alternatives
Appcast, Bullhorn, Ceipal ATS, Greenhouse, Handshake, JobDiva, Jobilla, Joveo, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, RippleMatchTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, RecruiteeGemini 3.5 FlashGemagainst: PhenomTeamtailorChangedagainst: Greenhouse, Lever, Phenom, RadancyPhenomBreezy HRagainst: Beamery, Phenomno first choicenothing named
Five alternatives
Ashby, Clinch, Jobvite, Lever, TeamtailorFour alternatives
Gem Career Sites, HappyDance, Ongig, WebflowSix alternatives
Beamery, Clinch, Radancy, Symphony Talent, Yello, iCIMS AttractFour alternatives
JazzHR, Manatal, Recruitee, Zoho RecruitSeven alternatives
Clinch, GR8 People, Gem, Greenhouse, Lever, Phenom, SmartRecruitersPerplexity SonarTeamtailoragainst: Phenom, RadancyTeamtailorHeldagainst: Phenom, iCIMS Attractno first choiceManatalno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Eightfold AI, Joveo, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, PandoLogic, Phenom, Radancy, Symphony Talent, Veritone Hire
Seven alternatives
Ashby, Clinch, Lever, Recruitee, SmartDreamers, SmartRecruiters, WorkableThree alternatives
Ongig, Recruitee, WorkableTwelve alternatives
Appcast, Beamery, Clinch, Gem, Joveo, PandoLogic, Phenom, Radancy, Symphony Talent, Talroo, Teamtailor, iCIMS AttractOne alternative
100HiresGrok 4.20Greenhouseagainst: Avature, Phenom, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS AttractTeamtailorChangedagainst: Phenom, SmartRecruitersPhenom, iCIMS AttractZoho RecruitTalentLyft, Teamtailoragainst: BrassRing, Bullhorn, Hiring Hub, Jobvite, Recruit CRM
Five alternatives
Breezy HR, Freshteam, JobScore, Teamtailor, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
Homerun, ParadoxFour alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Radancy, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Manatal, TalentLyft, WorkableTwo alternatives
Greenhouse, Zoho RecruitMistral SmallGreenhouseTeamtailorChangedno first choiceJobScore, Teamtailorno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Beamery, Freshteam, JobDiva, TalentLyftThree alternatives
MokaHR, Phenom, TalentNestTwo alternatives
Manatal, TalentLyftDeepSeek V4 FlashAshbyTeamtailorChangedagainst: Phenom, iCIMS AttractPhenomagainst: SmashFlyXZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Radancy, SmartRecruitersagainst: Bullhorn, Loxo, Oracle Taleo, Workday Recruiting
Four alternatives
Gem, Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruitersThree alternatives
Homerun, SmartRecruiters, WorkableFour alternatives
Avature, Beamery, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS AttractTwo alternatives
100Hires, JobScoreFour alternatives
Gem, Recruitee, SmashFlyX, TeamtailorLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceTalentNest, TeamtailorChangedno first choiceManatal, Teamtailor, Workableno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Roboscraping.comQwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse, LeverTeamtailorChangedBeamery, PhenomManatal, TalentLyftBeamery, Gem, Phenom, Teamtailoragainst: Oracle Recruiting, Oracle Taleoagainst: Hiring Hub, Jobhai, Leadline, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Loxo, Recruit CRM
Three alternatives
Beamery, Phenom Talent Experience Cloud, SmartDreamersFour alternatives
Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruiters, TalentNestFour alternatives
Ashby, Avature, Recruitee, TeamtailorTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, Zoho RecruitKimi K2GreenhouseTeamtailorChangedPhenomZoho RecruitGreenhouseagainst: Appcast, Care.com, CyberCoders, Eightfold AI, Gigats/Expand Inc., Indeed, Jobot, Joveo, Lensa, Mercor, PandoLogic, Swooped, Talentify, Veritone Hire, ZipRecruiter
Five alternatives
Gem, Recruitee, SmartRecruiters, Teamtailor, WorkableThree alternatives
Greenhouse, Lever, WorkableEight alternatives
Avature, Beamery, Manatal, SmartDreamers, Symphony Talent, Teamtailor, Zoho Recruit, iCIMS AttractFour alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, JazzHR, JuggleHireFive alternatives
Beamery, Gem, Phenom, SmartDreamers, TeamtailorGLM 4.7 FlashXTeamtailoragainst: LeverTeamtailorHeldno first choiceManatalno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Bullhorn, CareerBuilder Applicant Tracking, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Workday Recruiter
Four alternatives
Gem, Recruitee, Workable, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
LeverFive alternatives
Breezy HR, Jobin.cloud, Recruit CRM, Wellfound, Zoho RecruitMiniMax M2.5WorkableTeamtailorChangedno first choiceManatalno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Beamery, Greenhouse, TeamtailorThree alternatives
Paradox, Talenteria, iCIMS AttractTwo alternatives
Freshteam, ZipRecruiterGPT-6 LunaGemTeamtailorChangedno first choiceagainst: AvatureZoho Recruitagainst: Workableno first choiceagainst: SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, iCIMS Attract
One alternative
PhenomOne alternative
WebflowOne alternative
JobTarget MarketplaceMuse Glimmer 30BRecruitee, Teamtailoragainst: Beamery, PhenomTeamtailorChangedPhenomZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: AngelList Talent, Hired, Indeed, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Monster, SimplyHired, ZipRecruiter
Two alternatives
TalentLyft, WorkableThree alternatives
Lever, SmartRecruiters, TalentNestFive alternatives
Beamery, Gem, Radancy, Teamtailor, inploiThree alternatives
100Hires, Manatal, inploiBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:35 | yes | 10 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:45 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:09 | yes | 8 | 37 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 23 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:51 | yes | 9 | 91 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 20 | 84 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:26 | yes | 5 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 2 | 12 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:00 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:01 | yes | 10 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:08 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:48 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:32 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:06 | yes | 18 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:42 | yes | 5 | 52 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:58 | yes | 2 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 12 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:08 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 4 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:49 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:23 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:17 | yes | 10 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:31 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 12:40 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 10:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 12:21 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:36 | yes | 20 | 30 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 14 | 81 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:56 | yes | 20 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:47 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 25 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:00 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:03 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:55 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:20 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:52 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:38 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:10 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 14 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:52 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 13 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:15 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 13 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:17 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:33 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:01 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 10 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:50 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:23 | yes | 17 | 25 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:36 | yes | 9 | 39 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:04 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:04 | yes | 17 | 144 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 09:42 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:50 | yes | 13 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:17 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:25 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:16 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 12:45 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:30 | yes | 15 | 36 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:22 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:27 | yes | 23 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:32 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:14 | yes | 15 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:05 | yes | 25 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:27 | yes | 25 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:03 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 24 | 36 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
LinkedIn read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions
Oracle read as Oracle Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Taleo read as Oracle Taleo
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS read as iCIMS Attract
iCIMS (Talent Cloud / CXM) read as iCIMS Attract
iCIMS Talent Cloud read as iCIMS Attract
Unresolved, counted raw
AngelList Talent
CareerBuilder Applicant Tracking
Comparesave
Gem Career Sites
Gigats/Expand Inc.
HappyDance
JibberJobber
Jobhai
Leadline
Phenom Talent Experience Cloud
Roboscraping.com
Simplicant
Workday Recruiter
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.