Recruitment marketing and career sites · November 2026 Edition
Teamtailor vs TalentLyft
Five of fourteen models named Teamtailor first on the direct prompt; zero named TalentLyft. Teamtailor was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and TalentLyft by eight and Teamtailor carries 41 labels and TalentLyft 13, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share39%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels4113A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamtailor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Teamtailor vs Manatal · Teamtailor vs Zoho Recruit · Teamtailor vs Greenhouse
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamtailorFirst choices, of fourteen modelsTalentLyft
Direct50
Paraphrase130
Comparative10
Budget-constrained21
Scale-constrained21
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamtailor and TalentLyft stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Teamtailor TalentLyft first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamtailor on the left and TalentLyft on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamtailor and TalentLyft stood in it.
Teamtailor first, TalentLyft an alternative
5 of 14 modelsTalentLyft was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Claude Haiku 4.5Teamtailor, Workable alternatives: Greenhouse, Jobvite
GPT-5.4 miniTeamtailor alternatives: Jobvite, Workable
Perplexity SonarTeamtailor alternatives: Ashby, Clinch, Lever, Recruitee, SmartDreamers, SmartRecruiters, Workable
GLM 4.7 FlashXTeamtailor alternatives: Gem, Recruitee, Workable, Zoho Recruit
Muse Glimmer 30BRecruitee, Teamtailor alternatives: TalentLyft, Workable
Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Ashby, Clinch, Jobvite, Lever, Teamtailor
Grok 4.20Greenhouse alternatives: Breezy HR, Freshteam, JobScore, Teamtailor, Zoho Recruit
Mistral SmallGreenhouse alternatives: Beamery, Freshteam, JobDiva, TalentLyft
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: Gem, Recruitee, SmartRecruiters, Teamtailor, Workable
MiniMax M2.5Workable alternatives: Beamery, Greenhouse, Teamtailor
Neither was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.DeepSeek V4 FlashAshby alternatives: Gem, Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruiters
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse, Lever alternatives: Beamery, Phenom Talent Experience Cloud, SmartDreamers
GPT-6 LunaGem alternatives: Phenom
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Teamtailor leads by fourteen points.
Teamtailor17%#2 of 12TalentLyft3%#6 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Teamtailor leads by thirty-six points.
Teamtailor39%#1 of 17TalentLyft4%#7 of 17Enterprise
Teamtailor leads by three points.
Teamtailor3%#9 of 15TalentLyft0%#– of 15What the models said about Teamtailor
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“options like Manatal ($15/user/month), Workable ($299/month), or Teamtailor are recommended for their ease of setup and relatively lower costs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“The Top Pick for Design & Branding: Teamtailor ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“would be TalentNest or Teamtailor, as they are both user-friendly and designed for small to mid-sized businesses” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about TalentLyft
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“If you are a team of 2-5 recruiters: Go with TalentLyft for predictable costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Teamtailor or TalentLyft for strong all-around marketing focus” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“offers a comprehensive free tier designed for organizations seeking to build employer brands and talent pipelines without upfront investment” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared
Teamtailor vs ManatalTeamtailor vs Zoho RecruitTeamtailor vs GreenhouseTeamtailor vs WorkableTeamtailor vs GemTeamtailor vs BeameryManatal vs TalentLyftZoho Recruit vs TalentLyftGreenhouse vs TalentLyftWorkable vs TalentLyftGem vs TalentLyftTalentLyft vs BeameryAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full recruitment marketing standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.