Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Recruitment marketing › TalentLyft vs Beamery
Recruitment marketing and career sites · November 2026 Edition

TalentLyft vs Beamery

Zero of fourteen models named TalentLyft first on the direct prompt; zero named Beamery. TalentLyft was named by eight of the fourteen models and Beamery by twelve and TalentLyft carries 13 labels and Beamery 21, so the shares are not directly comparable.

TalentLyft

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Beamery

accepted challenger

Named in ten categories this edition.

First-choice share4%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%14%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#7#8A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels1321A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, TalentLyft reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Teamtailor was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Teamtailor vs TalentLyft · Teamtailor vs Beamery · Manatal vs TalentLyft

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TalentLyftFirst choices, of fourteen modelsBeamery
Direct002 against Beamery
Paraphrase00
Comparative01
Budget-constrained101 against Beamery
Scale-constrained11
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where TalentLyft and Beamery stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
TalentLyft Beamery first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, TalentLyft on the left and Beamery on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where TalentLyft and Beamery stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Mistral SmallGreenhouse alternatives: Beamery, Freshteam, JobDiva, TalentLyft
Qwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse, Lever alternatives: Beamery, Phenom Talent Experience Cloud, SmartDreamers
MiniMax M2.5Workable alternatives: Beamery, Greenhouse, Teamtailor
Muse Glimmer 30BRecruitee, Teamtailor alternatives: TalentLyft, Workable

Neither was named

10 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Teamtailor, Workable alternatives: Greenhouse, Jobvite
GPT-5.4 miniTeamtailor alternatives: Jobvite, Workable
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Ashby, Clinch, Jobvite, Lever, Teamtailor
Perplexity SonarTeamtailor alternatives: Ashby, Clinch, Lever, Recruitee, SmartDreamers, SmartRecruiters, Workable
Grok 4.20Greenhouse alternatives: Breezy HR, Freshteam, JobScore, Teamtailor, Zoho Recruit
DeepSeek V4 FlashAshby alternatives: Gem, Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruiters
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: Gem, Recruitee, SmartRecruiters, Teamtailor, Workable
GLM 4.7 FlashXTeamtailor alternatives: Gem, Recruitee, Workable, Zoho Recruit
GPT-6 LunaGem alternatives: Phenom

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
TalentLyft leads by three points.
TalentLyft3%#6 of 12
Beamery0%#11 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
TalentLyft leads by two points.
TalentLyft4%#7 of 17
Beamery2%#8 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Beamery leads at enterprise.
Beamery3%#7 of 15
TalentLyft0%#– of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about TalentLyft

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“If you are a team of 2-5 recruiters: Go with TalentLyft for predictable costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with Teamtailor or TalentLyft for strong all-around marketing focus” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · first choice
“offers a comprehensive free tier designed for organizations seeking to build employer brands and talent pipelines without upfront investment” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · alternative

What the models said about Beamery

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“Examples in this category often include Teamtailor, Beamery, Gem, or Phenom.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Deep Automation & Segmentation | Beamery or Phenom” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.