Recruitment marketing and career sites for small business buyers
Asked as “recruitment marketing platform”, and as “career site builder”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 59 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
19%
Contested · Teamtailor 17%
19Manatal17Teamtailor17Zoho Recruit47others
19% of first choices, contested.
Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Manatal (19%) replaces Workable (12% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Manatal leads at 19%, replacing Workable, which led at 12% and stands at 12% now: 7 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Manatal19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Manatal (19%) replaces Workable (12% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-market
Teamtailor39%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →Enterprise
Phenom45%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →
Manatal19%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: Manatal (19%) replaces Workable (12% then, 12% now), 7 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.This pageMid-marketTeamtailor39%Contested▲+16Since October 2026: 23% → 39%, +16 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.Standing →EnterprisePhenom45%Clear leader▲+10Since October 2026: 35% → 45%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Manatal19%0%29accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 12% → 19%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 19%
Manatal19%0%29accepted challenger▲+7Since October 2026: 12% → 19%, +7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 19%02Teamtailor17%2%41accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 7% → 17%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 17%
Teamtailor17%2%41accepted challenger▲+10Since October 2026: 7% → 17%, +10 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 17%03
Zoho Recruit17%3%30accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 17%
Zoho Recruit17%3%30accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 12% → 17%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 17%04
Workable12%8%40accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 12% → 12%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 12%
Workable12%8%40accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 12% → 12%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.12% → 12%05
Breezy HR5%5%21accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 11% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 5%
Breezy HR5%5%21accepted challenger▼−6Since October 2026: 11% → 5%, −6 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 5%06
TalentLyft3%0%14accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 3%
TalentLyft3%0%14accepted challenger▼−1Since October 2026: 4% → 3%, −1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 3%07
LinkedIn Talent Solutions2%30%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
LinkedIn Talent Solutions2%30%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%08
Indeed2%50%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Indeed2%50%10criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12Phenom0%89%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Phenom0%89%18criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%11
Beamery0%85%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Beamery0%85%13criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
100Hires0%0%22accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
100Hires0%0%22accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%10
JazzHR0%0%14accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 11% → 0%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 0%
JazzHR0%0%14accepted challenger▼−11Since October 2026: 11% → 0%, −11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Teamtailor vs WorkableTeamtailor vs GemTeamtailor vs TalentLyftTeamtailor vs BeameryManatal vs Zoho RecruitManatal vs GreenhouseManatal vs WorkableManatal vs GemManatal vs TalentLyftManatal vs BeameryZoho Recruit vs GreenhouseZoho Recruit vs WorkableZoho Recruit vs GemZoho Recruit vs TalentLyftZoho Recruit vs BeameryGreenhouse vs WorkableGreenhouse vs GemGreenhouse vs TalentLyftGreenhouse vs BeameryWorkable vs GemWorkable vs TalentLyftWorkable vs BeameryGem vs TalentLyftGem vs BeameryTalentLyft vs Beamery
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative30%
Key
01Manatal19%
Manatal19%02Teamtailor17%
Teamtailor17%03Zoho Recruit17%
Zoho Recruit17%04Workable12%
Workable12%05Breezy HR5%
Breezy HR5%06TalentLyft3%
TalentLyft3%07LinkedIn Talent Solutions2%
LinkedIn Talent Solutions2%08Indeed2%
Indeed2%09100Hires0%
100Hires0%10JazzHR0%
JazzHR0%11Beamery0%
Beamery0%12Phenom0%
Phenom0%What they warned about
One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Phenom89%
16 of 18 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise-heavy tools like Beamery, Joveo, or Phenom unless you're scaling rapidly—they're overkill and expensive for small teams.” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
Radancy100%
8 of 8 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Enterprise employer-branding suites typically require large annual commitments, dedicated implementation and marketing-ops resources that small teams do not have.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Eightfold AI100%
7 of 7 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Be especially cautious about: - Eightfold and Beamery: Their cost, implementation effort, and enterprise orientation can be excessive” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
Beamery85%
11 of 13 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Eightfold and Beamery: Their cost, implementation effort, and enterprise orientation can be excessive” Perplexity Sonar, negative prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 811 links across 192 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
41 answers · 60 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G240 answers · 59 citations · 13 models
35 answers · 68 citations · 11 models
29 answers · 37 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Guideflow26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
25 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Rework22 answers · 24 citations · 6 models
20 answers · 20 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group19 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
13 answers · 13 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Teamtailor11 answers · 28 citations · 6 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 10 models
25 answers · 8 models
24 answers · 8 models
22 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 4 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platform”, “recruitment marketing platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manatal manatal.com | 19% | 305 | 2,400 | 267 | 73,150 | 120 | 7 | |
| Teamtailor teamtailor.com | 17% | 109 | 2,400 | 59 | 42,407 | $230 | 114 | |
| Zoho zoho.com Zoho Recruit 17% | 17% | 312 | 2,900 | 46 | 1,216,894 company | $51,031 | 119 | |
| Workable workable.com | 12% | 332 | 14,800 | 520 | 698,499 | $14,562 | 77 | |
| Breezy breezy.hr Breezy HR 5% | 5% | 226 | 3,600 | 59 | 178,670 company | $56 | 25 | |
| inploi | 5% | |||||||
| TalentLyft talentlyft.com | 3% | 28 | 70 | 3 | 67,376 | |||
| Homerun homerun.co | 3% | 12 | ||||||
| Ashby ashbyhq.com | 2% | 217 | 49,500 | 3,112 | 216,820 | 16 | ||
| JobScore jobscore.com | 2% | 10 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 20 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (selectsoftwarereviews.com, softwareadvice.com). The first result for “best recruitment marketing platform” is peoplemanagingpeople.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which career site builder would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top recruitment marketing platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best recruitment marketing platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a recruitment marketing platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which recruitment marketing platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ManatalJuggleHireChangedWorkableagainst: Snov.ioLoxo, Manatal, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Joveo, SmashFlyX
Four alternatives
JazzHR, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, TalentLyft, WorkableThree alternatives
Easy Careers Page, Spacewalk, WorkableFour alternatives
Freshteam, JazzHR, Loxo, ManatalTwo alternatives
100Hires, TalentLyftGPT-5.4 miniAvaHRWorkableChangedTeamtailoragainst: Bullhorn, Phenom, SmartRecruiters, Zoho Recruit, iCIMS AttractWorkable, Zoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Bullhorn, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Talroo, iCIMS Attract
Two alternatives
Ceipal ATS, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
JazzHR, TeamtailorFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Ceipal ATS, JazzHR, WorkableTwo alternatives
Breezy HR, JazzHRGemini 3.5 FlashTeamtailor, Workableagainst: Beamery, Phenom, Symphony TalentTeamtailorChangedTalentLyftagainst: Beamery, PhenomBreezy HR, Zoho Recruitagainst: Beamery, PhenomTeamtailoragainst: Beamery, Phenom, Symphony Talentagainst: Appcast, Beamery, CareerBuilder, Dice, Indeed, Joveo, LinkedIn Jobs, Monster, Phenom, Radancy, Recruitics, Symphony Talent, Workday Recruiting, ZipRecruiter
Three alternatives
Ashby, Breezy HR, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Framer, Recruitee, WebflowFour alternatives
Breezy HR, Gem, Recruitee, WorkableThree alternatives
Freshteam, JazzHR, ManatalFour alternatives
Ashby, Pinpoint, Recruitee, WorkablePerplexity SonarWorkableagainst: Avature, Phenom, Radancy, Symphony TalentTeamtailorChangedagainst: WorkableWorkableagainst: LoxoManatalagainst: Beamery, Phenom, Radancy, iCIMS Attractno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Greenhouse, Joveo, Lever, LinkedIn recruitment advertising, NEOGOV, PandoLogic, TikTok
Two alternatives
Manatal, TeamtailorTwo alternatives
Homerun, SpacewalkSix alternatives
Appcast, JazzHR, Joveo, Manatal, Recruitee, TeamtailorOne alternative
FreshteamGrok 4.20Manatalagainst: Avature, Beamery, Joveo, Phenom, iCIMS AttractHomerunChangedagainst: Phenom, iCIMS AttractManatal, Teamtailoragainst: Avature, Indeed, Joveo, PhenomIndeed, LinkedIn Talent Solutionsagainst: Phenom, RadancyZoho Recruitagainst: Avatureagainst: Glassdoor, Indeed, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Monster, ZipRecruiter
Two alternatives
Workable, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Teamtailor, Webflow, Wix, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
JobScore, LinkedIn Recruiter, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, WorkableFive alternatives
100Hires, Glassdoor, JuggleHire, Manatal, ZipRecruiterSeven alternatives
100Hires, BambooHR Recruiting, JazzHR, Manatal, Recruiterflow, SmartRecruiters, TalentLyftMistral SmallTalentLyft, inploiHubSpot Content HubChangedTeamtailorTalentLyft, Workableno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Symphony Talent
One alternative
Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Vitara.ai, Webflow, Wix, WordPress.orgFive alternatives
JobScore, Recruitee, Recruiterflow, TalentLyft, WizehireThree alternatives
100Hires, Zoho Recruit, iSmartRecruitDeepSeek V4 FlashWorkableagainst: Phenom, Radancy, iCIMS AttractBreezy HRChangedagainst: WorkableTeamtailorZoho RecruitManatalagainst: Greenhouse, SmartRecruitersagainst: Apna, Arya, Avature, Aviontè, Beamery, Eightfold AI, Experteer, Hiring Hub, JobAdder, Leoforce, Phenom, Shine.com, SmartDreamers, WorkIndia
Three alternatives
Breezy HR, Manatal, TeamtailorTwo alternatives
Homerun, TeamtailorFour alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, Manatal, WorkableFour alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, Recruiterflow, ZipRecruiterTwo alternatives
Teamtailor, WorkableLlama 4 Maverickinploino first choiceChangedno first choiceManatalno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Symphony Talent
Four alternatives
JobScore, TalentLyft, Teamtailor, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
Freshteam, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Teamtailor, WorkableQwen 3.7 FlashAshbyHubSpot CMSChangedTalentLyft, Zoho Recruitagainst: Rippling, ZenefitsBreezy HR, Zoho Recruitagainst: Jobvite, RadancyJobScoreagainst: Teamtailoragainst: Indeed, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, ZipRecruiter
Three alternatives
Jabbawockeez, SocialRecruit, ZipRecruiterFour alternatives
Indeed, LinkedIn Company Pages, Squarespace, WordPress.comThree alternatives
Brazen, LinkedIn Recruiter, Recruit CRMOne alternative
FreshteamThree alternatives
LimeLight AI, LinkedIn Recruiter, PhilyoKimi K2Teamtailoragainst: WorkableTeamtailorHeldagainst: Breezy HR100HiresManatal, Zoho RecruitJobilla, Teamtailor, Zoho Recruitagainst: Aviont, Bullhorn, Greenhouse, Indeed, LinkedIn Recruiter, Loxo, Oracle Taleo, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Three alternatives
100Hires, Breezy HR, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
HomerunThree alternatives
Recruiterflow, Teamtailor, WizehireThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Freshteam, WorkableGLM 4.7 FlashXManatalTeamtailorChanged100Hires, ManatalManatalno first choiceagainst: Beamery, Bullhorn, Fetcher, Greenhouse, Lever, LinkedIn Recruiter, SmartRecruiters, Workday Talent, hireEZ
Four alternatives
Recruit CRM, TalentLyft, Teamtailor, Zoho RecruitTwo alternatives
CareerPage, VeloraHRThree alternatives
Greenhouse, TalentLyft, WorkableThree alternatives
Breezy HR, Recruit CRM, Zoho RecruitMiniMax M2.5ManatalTeamtailorChangedManatalZoho RecruitTeamtailoragainst: Appcast, Avature, Eightfold AI, Jobhai.com, LinkedIn Talent Solutions, Loxo, Phenom, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Teamtailor, WorkableThree alternatives
Homerun, Recruitee, TribepadFive alternatives
100Hires, Recruiterflow, Teamtailor, Truflle, WorkableFour alternatives
Breezy HR, GoHire, JazzHR, ManatalFour alternatives
100Hires, Manatal, SmartRecruiters, Zoho RecruitGPT-6 LunaWorkableEasy Careers PageChangedBreezy HRZoho Recruitno first choiceagainst: Appcast, Beamery, Joveo, Phenom, Radancy, Recruitics, Symphony Talent
One alternative
JazzHROne alternative
WorkableFour alternatives
JazzHR, Teamtailor, Workable, Zoho RecruitOne alternative
IndeedMuse Glimmer 30BinploiHomerunChangedManatal, TeamtailorManatalno first choiceagainst: Eightfold AI, Radancy, SmartRecruiters
Three alternatives
Manatal, Teamtailor, WorkableFour alternatives
100Hires, Teamtailor, Wizehire, Zoho RecruitFour alternatives
100Hires, Recruitee, Workable, inploiThree alternatives
100Hires, Wizehire, inploiBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:13 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:24 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:05 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:13 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:40 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:27 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 13 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 9 | 44 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 08:47 | yes | 15 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 2 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:21 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:57 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:45 | no | 0 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:48 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:23 | yes | 8 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:48 | yes | 24 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:44 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 10 | 62 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:03 | yes | 25 | 40 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 22 | 79 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 2 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:25 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:01 | yes | 6 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:01 | no | 0 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:14 | yes | 10 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:04 | yes | 10 | 37 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 21 | 53 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:37 | yes | 5 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 18 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:31 | yes | 20 | 57 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:26 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 6 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:54 | yes | 11 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:58 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 10:28 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:49 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:48 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:31 | yes | 15 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:29 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:49 | yes | 19 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:15 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 5 | 37 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:10 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:20 | yes | 21 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:18 | yes | 5 | 14 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 09:33 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:31 | yes | 11 | 20 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:56 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:44 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 10:52 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:25 | yes | 14 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:22 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:19 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:20 | yes | 5 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:14 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:41 | yes | 3 | 15 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:44 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 12:10 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:26 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:33 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:27 | yes | 9 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:15 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 08:38 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:35 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 09:00 | yes | 10 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:46 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:43 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:34 | yes | 24 | 79 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:23 | yes | 2 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:55 | yes | 23 | 26 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
BambooHR read as BambooHR Recruiting
Eightfold read as Eightfold AI
LinkedIn read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions
LinkedIn (Free Tier) read as LinkedIn Talent Solutions
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS read as iCIMS Attract
Unresolved, counted raw
Apna
Aviont
Aviontè
Budbee
EvenUp
Experteer
Framer
HubSpot CMS
HubSpot Content Hub
Jabbawockeez
Jobhai.com
Leoforce
LimeLight AI
LinkedIn Company Pages
LinkedIn recruitment advertising
NEOGOV
Philyo
Shine.com
SocialRecruit
Staffing Referrals
Tribepad
Truflle
VeloraHR
Vitara.ai
WordPress.com
WordPress.org
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.