Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Recruitment marketing › Zoho Recruit vs Workable
Recruitment marketing and career sites · November 2026 Edition

Zoho Recruit vs Workable

Zero of fourteen models named Zoho Recruit first on the direct prompt; two named Workable. Zoho Recruit was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Workable by eleven and Zoho Recruit carries 22 labels and Workable 20, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Zoho Recruit

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

Workable

accepted challenger

Named in fourteen categories this edition.

First-choice share9%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%5%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels2220A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Zoho Recruit reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Teamtailor was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Teamtailor vs Zoho Recruit · Teamtailor vs Workable · Manatal vs Zoho Recruit

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Zoho RecruitFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkable
Direct02
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained521 against Workable
Scale-constrained00
Negative10
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Zoho Recruit and Workable were named in the same answer ninety-six times, of the 327 answers naming Zoho Recruit and the 367 naming Workable. In those answers Workable took the first choice seventeen times and Zoho Recruit eleven.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Zoho Recruit and Workable stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Zoho Recruit Workable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Zoho Recruit on the left and Workable on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Zoho Recruit and Workable stood in it.

Workable first, Zoho Recruit not the choice

2 of 14 modelsZoho Recruit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Teamtailor, Workable alternatives: Greenhouse, Jobvite
MiniMax M2.5Workable alternatives: Beamery, Greenhouse, Teamtailor

Neither was the first choice, one was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniTeamtailor alternatives: Jobvite, Workable
Perplexity SonarTeamtailor alternatives: Ashby, Clinch, Lever, Recruitee, SmartDreamers, SmartRecruiters, Workable
Grok 4.20Greenhouse alternatives: Breezy HR, Freshteam, JobScore, Teamtailor, Zoho Recruit
Kimi K2Greenhouse alternatives: Gem, Recruitee, SmartRecruiters, Teamtailor, Workable
GLM 4.7 FlashXTeamtailor alternatives: Gem, Recruitee, Workable, Zoho Recruit
Muse Glimmer 30BRecruitee, Teamtailor alternatives: TalentLyft, Workable

Neither was named

6 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem alternatives: Ashby, Clinch, Jobvite, Lever, Teamtailor
Mistral SmallGreenhouse alternatives: Beamery, Freshteam, JobDiva, TalentLyft
DeepSeek V4 FlashAshby alternatives: Gem, Greenhouse, Lever, SmartRecruiters
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice
Qwen 3.7 FlashGreenhouse, Lever alternatives: Beamery, Phenom Talent Experience Cloud, SmartDreamers
GPT-6 LunaGem alternatives: Phenom

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zoho Recruit leads by five points.
Zoho Recruit17%#3 of 12
Workable12%#4 of 12
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Zoho Recruit leads by two points.
Zoho Recruit9%#3 of 17
Workable7%#5 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Zoho Recruit0%#– of 15
Workable0%#– of 15
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Zoho Recruit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Prioritize platforms with strong, recent ratings (e.g., 4.5+ on Capterra/G2) like Zoho Recruit, Teamtailor, or iCIMS for marketing features.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Workable

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“its listed entry price is $299/month for companies with 1–20 employees, so it may be more than a tight budget calls for” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“options like Manatal ($15/user/month), Workable ($299/month), or Teamtailor are recommended for their ease of setup and relatively lower costs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.