Greenhouse vs Workable
Four of fourteen models named Greenhouse first on the direct prompt; two named Workable. Greenhouse was named by ten of the fourteen models and Workable by eleven and both carry 20 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Named in fourteen categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.
By framing
GreenhouseFirst choices, of fourteen modelsWorkable
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Greenhouse and Workable were named in the same answer 153 times, of the 456 answers naming Greenhouse and the 367 naming Workable. In those answers Workable took the first choice thirty-nine times and Greenhouse twenty-four.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | ||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | |||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | |||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | |
Greenhouse Workable first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Greenhouse on the left and Workable on the right.The direct prompt
Greenhouse first, Workable an alternative
4 of 14 modelsWorkable was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Workable first, Greenhouse an alternative
2 of 14 modelsGreenhouse was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Workable12%#4 of 12Greenhouse0%#– of 12Greenhouse9%#4 of 17Workable7%#5 of 17Greenhouse5%#6 of 15Workable0%#– of 15What the models said about Greenhouse
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.
“Start with Lever or Greenhouse if you want an all-in-one solution that combines ATS and basic recruitment marketing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Workable
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.
“its listed entry price is $299/month for companies with 1–20 employees, so it may be more than a tight budget calls for” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“options like Manatal ($15/user/month), Workable ($299/month), or Teamtailor are recommended for their ease of setup and relatively lower costs” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.