Greenhouse is applicant tracking software and a hiring platform for companies and hiring teams · greenhouse.com ↗
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
Breezy HR is first at 32%.
Ranked first, contested: Workable has 16%. 6 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Ranked first. Next is iCIMS at 18%.
“Greenhouse is the most cited leader for structured, process-heavy hiring with interview kits, scorecards and deep reporting built for mid-market and enterprise teams.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Paraphrase question · first choice
“Best Overall for Most Mid-Market B2B Teams: Greenhouse – Excels in structured hiring, detailed reporting/analytics, and scalability.”Grok 4.20 · Direct question · first choice
“Start with Lever or Greenhouse if you want an all-in-one solution that combines ATS and basic recruitment marketing.”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Direct question · first choice
“The gold standard for mid-market and scaling tech firms focusing on \u2018Structured Hiring\u2019 to eliminate bias.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Comparative question · first choice
“Avoid expensive enterprise systems like Greenhouse or Lever unless you have the scale”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Budget-constrained question · warning
“Avoid Greenhouse unless you specifically need enterprise-grade structured hiring workflows and are comfortable with custom pricing in the $10K+ range.”Kimi K2 · Direct question · warning
“Excellent but custom-quoted ($5,100–$70,000+/year) and 6–12 week implementation. Overkill unless you have a dedicated recruiting ops team.”Kimi K2 · Paraphrase question · warning
“You are likely outgrowing standard Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) like Greenhouse or Lever which manage the *process* of hiring”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Scale-constrained question · warning
The products named in the same answers as Greenhouse, over the 456 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 236 | 8 | Compare → | |
| 163 | 17 | Compare → | |
| 154 | 10 | View → | |
| 153 | 39 | Compare → | |
| 123 | 11 | View → | |
| 112 | 5 | View → | |
| 80 | 4 | Compare → | |
| 71 | 12 | View → | |
| 66 | 28 | Compare → | |
| 64 | 7 | View → |
What the models named instead of Greenhouse →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
Stated on Greenhouse's own site, not checked by Gane.
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 401 of the 456 answers that named Greenhouse and are not a share of its labels.
716 of the 796 domain citations in answers naming Greenhouse came from a third party's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 4 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 11 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 12 |
| Grok 4.20 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 17 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 12 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 14 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 8 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 5 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 22 |
| Kimi K2 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 20 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 19 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 4 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 12 |
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,101 | undated | |||
| Case study | 166 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 104 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 82 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 74 | undated | |||
| News or press | 52 | 0 | 2026-04-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 34 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 29 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 10 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 8 | undated |
As the event pages on greenhouse.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page greenhouse.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.