Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Interview scheduling · November 2026 Edition

Interview scheduling

Asked as “interview scheduling software”, and as “recruiting coordination tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 50 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
28%
Contested · Calendly 16%
28ModernLoop16Calendly12GoodTime44others

28% of first choices, contested.

Since October 2026↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ModernLoop (28%) replaces Calendly (20% then, 16% now), 12 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.ModernLoop leads at 28%, replacing Calendly, which led at 20% and stands at 16% now: 12 points clear, inside the floor, so the swap reads as unsettled.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01ModernLoop28%10%42accepted challenger▲+19Since October 2026: 9% → 28%, +19 points. Past the 13-point floor: movement.9% → 28%
02Calendly16%29%59criticized challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 20% → 16%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.20% → 16%
03GoodTime12%22%54accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 16% → 12%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.16% → 12%
04Koalendar10%11%19accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 6% → 10%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.6% → 10%
05Cal.com8%13%23accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 8% → 8%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 8%
06Lever8%22%18accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 11% → 8%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.11% → 8%
07Greenhouse4%13%23accepted challenger▼−4Since October 2026: 8% → 4%, −4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.8% → 4%
08Prelude2%29%14criticized challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Show the seven products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15HireVue0%60%10criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14Microsoft Bookings0%30%10criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
13VidCruiter0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
12YouCanBookMe0%23%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Paradox0%21%24accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
11candidate.fyi0%7%14accepted challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
09Ashby0%4%26accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
P08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01ModernLoop28%
02Calendly16%
03GoodTime12%
04Koalendar10%
05Cal.com8%
06Lever8%
07Greenhouse4%
08Prelude2%
09Ashby0%
10Paradox0%
11candidate.fyi0%
12YouCanBookMe0%
13VidCruiter0%
14Microsoft Bookings0%
15HireVue0%

What they warned about

Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Calendly
29%
17 of 59 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“General-purpose tools like Calendly and Microsoft Bookings lack the ATS depth and interviewer load balancing that recruiting teams need at scale.” Muse Glimmer 30B, direct prompt
GoodTime
22%
12 of 54 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“What to Avoid - Enterprise-focused tools like GoodTime, VidCruiter, or Paradox” Kimi K2, budget prompt
HireVue
60%
6 of 10 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid for mid-market B2B: Pure enterprise like HireVue/Paradox (too complex/expensive)” Grok 4.20, direct prompt
Paradox
21%
5 of 24 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Avoid for mid-market B2B: Pure enterprise like HireVue/Paradox (too complex/expensive)” Grok 4.20, direct prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 837 links across 188 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Cal.com38 answers · 60 citations · 12 models
vendor site · ModernLoop27 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Koalendar24 answers · 32 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Lever24 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · GoodTime23 answers · 32 citations · 12 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group19 answers · 36 citations · 9 models
vendor site · G219 answers · 30 citations · 9 models
18 answers · 23 citations · 10 models
vendor site · FluentBooking17 answers · 17 citations · 10 models
15 answers · 24 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Calendly15 answers · 21 citations · 8 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best interview scheduling software”, “interview scheduling software”, “interview scheduling tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
ModernLoop modernloop.com28%1168807410
Calendly calendly.com16%214368,0002,824292,858$345
GoodTime goodtime.io12%156135,0006142,435$1,62774
Koalendar koalendar.com10%482,400321,332,6999
Cal.com cal.com8%922,900100439,9433
Lever lever.co8%22160,50024,663189,552$6577
Workable workable.com6%33214,800520698,499$14,56277
Greenhouse greenhouse.com4%401301,00052,27362,551$5,54574
Grayscale2%
Prelude2%60,50012,629

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (candidate.fyi, goodtime.io, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best interview scheduling software” is candidate.fyi.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best interview scheduling software for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which recruiting coordination tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top interview scheduling tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best interview scheduling software for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating an interview scheduling software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which interview scheduling tools should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ModernLoop
Three alternativesAshby, GoodTime, Prelude
no first choiceChangedGoodTime
Five alternativesCalendly, Eightfold AI, ModernLoop, Paradox, VidCruiter
Calendly
Three alternativesGoogle Calendar, Koalendar, YouCanBookMe
no first choiceagainst: Calendly
GPT-5.4 miniGoodTime
Four alternativesAshby, Calendly, Greenhouse, Lever
LeverChanged
Two alternativesGoodTime, candidate.fyi
no first choice
Twelve alternativesAcuity Scheduling, Ashby, Calendly, GoodTime, Google Appointment Schedule, Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, Microsoft Bookings, ModernLoop, Paradox, Prelude
Calendly
Three alternativesAshby, Google Calendar, Workstream
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashModernLoop
Three alternativesAshby, GoodTime, candidate.fyi
against: Calendly, Prelude, YouCanBookMe
ModernLoopHeld
Three alternativesAshby, GoodTime, candidate.fyi
against: Calendly
GoodTime
Four alternativesArrange, ModernLoop, Paradox, candidate.fyi
against: Calendly
Cal.com
Eight alternativesCalendly, Google Workspace, Koalendar, Manatal, Microsoft Bookings, YouCanBookMe, Zoho Bookings, Zoho Recruit
against: GoodTime, ModernLoop
no first choiceagainst: Calendlyagainst: Calendly, Doodle, HireVue, Paradox, Prelude, Setmore, Spark Hire, VidCruiter, Willo, YouCanBookMe
Perplexity SonarGoodTime
Four alternativesAshby, Cal.com, Lever, ModernLoop
against: Calendly
LeverChanged
Four alternativesAshby, GoodTime, Greenhouse, Workable
no first choice
Nine alternativesAshby, Cal.com, Calendly, GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, Paradox, VidCruiter, candidate.fyi
Calendly
Three alternativesCal.com, Koalendar, YouCanBookMe
against: GoodTime, ModernLoop
no first choiceagainst: Cal.com, Calendly, Koalendar, YouCanBookMe
Grok 4.20ModernLoop
Two alternativesGrayscale, Prelude
against: Cal.com, Calendly, GoodTime, HireVue, Microsoft Bookings, Paradox, candidate.fyi
WorkableChanged
Three alternativesBreezy HR, Jobvite, Teamtailor
against: Greenhouse, Lever
Cal.com, Calendly
Four alternativesCronofy, GoodTime, HireVue, Setmore
Cal.com
Four alternativesCalendly, Google Calendar, Koalendar, Microsoft Bookings
against: Ashby, GoodTime, ModernLoop, Paradox
no first choiceagainst: ADP Workforce Now, Calendly, Doodle, GoodTime, Koalendar, Microsoft Bookings, Paylocity, Picktime, Sense
Mistral SmallGoodTime
Three alternativesCalendly, ModernLoop, Paradox
Jobvite, WorkableChangedCal.com
Nine alternativesCalendly, GoodTime, Koalendar, ModernLoop, Paradox, Setmore, VidCruiter, YouCanBookMe, myInterview
Calendly
Three alternativesDoodle, Koalendar, Setmore
no first choicenothing named
DeepSeek V4 FlashModernLoop
One alternativeCalendly
against: GoodTime
WorkableChanged
Two alternativesGreenhouse, Lever
against: GoodTime
GoodTime, ModernLoop
Five alternativesCal.com, Calendly, Cronofy, Koalendar, Paradox
against: Prelude
Koalendar
Three alternativesCalendly, Picktime, YouCanBookMe
no first choiceagainst: Calendly, Doodle, GoodTime, HireVue, Sense, VidCruiter, myInterview
Llama 4 MaverickModernLoop
Two alternativesCalendly, GoodTime
no first choiceChangedno first choiceCalendly
Two alternativesBreezy HR, WhenAvailable
no first choicenothing named
Qwen 3.7 FlashCalendly, ModernLoop
Three alternativesGoodTime, Greenhouse, Lever
Calendly, GoodTimeChanged
Two alternativesAshby, Lever
GoodTime
Seven alternativesAshby, Cal.com, Calendly, Greenhouse, Koalendar, ModernLoop, Paradox
Calendly, Koalendar
Three alternativesGoogle Calendar, Outlook, YouCanBookMe
no first choiceagainst: Calendly, Greenhouse, HireVue, Lever, Workday Recruiting
Kimi K2ModernLoop
One alternativeGoodTime
against: Calendly
ModernLoopHeld
Two alternativesCalendly, Paradox
against: GoodTime, Prelude
no first choice
Five alternativesCal.com, Calendly, GoodTime, ModernLoop, Paradox
against: HireVue
Koalendar
Four alternativesCalendly, Microsoft Bookings, Setmore, YouCanBookMe
against: GoodTime, Paradox, VidCruiter
no first choiceagainst: Calendly, Doodle, Greenhouse, Indeed Automated Scheduling, Lever, Workday Recruiting
GLM 4.7 FlashXModernLoop
Two alternativesGoodTime, Grayscale
Greenhouse, LeverChanged
Eight alternativesAshby, Calendly, GoodTime, Grayscale, ModernLoop, Prelude, VidCruiter, candidate.fyi
Calendly
Seven alternativesAcuity Scheduling, Clara, Cronofy, GoodTime, HireVue, ModernLoop, Paradox
Koalendar
Three alternativesCalendly, Google Calendar, Setmore
no first choicenothing named
MiniMax M2.5ModernLoop
Three alternativesCal.com, GoodTime, VidCruiter
against: Calendly
Greenhouse, LeverChanged
Four alternativesAshby, Jazz HR, Rippling, Zoho Recruit
Cal.com
Four alternativesCalendly, GoodTime, Greenhouse, Koalendar
Koalendar
Three alternativesCalendly, Picktime, Setmore
no first choiceagainst: Cal.com, Calendly
GPT-6 LunaModernLoop
Two alternativesAshby's native scheduling, GoodTime
GoodTimeChanged
Three alternativesAshby, Calendly, Prelude
no first choice
Six alternativesAshby, Calendly, GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, Paradox
against: Cronofy
Zoho Bookings
Two alternativesCalendly, Microsoft Bookings
against: GoodTime
no first choicenothing named
Muse Glimmer 30BModernLoop
Two alternativesGrayscale, Prelude
against: Calendly, Microsoft Bookings
Cal.com, GoodTimeChanged
One alternativeWorkable
Cal.com
Five alternativesCalendly, Chili Piper, GoodTime, ModernLoop, ScheduleOnce
Cal.com
Four alternativesCalendly, Koalendar, Setmore, TidyCal
against: GoodTime, ModernLoop
Grayscale, ModernLoop, Preludeagainst: HireVue, Lever, Olivia, Paradox
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:46yes107 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:17yes26 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:17yes1024 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:00yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:04yes1238 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:02yes55 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:40yes2034 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:21yes52 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:24yes517 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 08:46yes1442 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:25yes2132 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:10yes1551 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:49yes312 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:46yes914 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:21no04 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:44yes15 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:27yes821 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:16yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:20yes526 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:49yes54 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:48yes2419 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:43yes52 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:59no028 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:17yes2050 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:11yes20190 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:50no012 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:11yes414 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:23yes2131 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:01yes98 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:35yes69 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:22yes924 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:26yes104 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:11yes536 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:34yes56 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:16yes2057 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:52yes52 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:11yes522 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:51yes1337 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:12yes2464 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:16yes923 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:43yes720 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 10:00yes1529 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:04yes107 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:05yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:55yes920 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 10:24yes104 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:29yes532 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:56yes54 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 10:30yes2422 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:28yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:06yes518 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:51yes1223 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:58yes2248 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:25yes532 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:28yes419 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:07yes1317 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:50no07 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 12:36no05 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:25no017 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:51yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:16yes529 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:38no05 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:08yes2327 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:20yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 11:49no024 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:28yes1422 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:49yes1321 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:47no021 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:23yes212 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:30yes1321 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 08:59yes2812 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:54yes46 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:19yes1119 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:24yes104 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:15yes1436 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 08:50yes55 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:54yes2533 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 11:07yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:57yes2362 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 10:34yes2542 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:41yes2226 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 08:45yes1599 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:24yes219 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 12:17yes2529 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acuity read as Acuity Scheduling
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS read as iCIMS Talent Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Amelia
Ashby's native scheduling
Calendly for Enterprise
Candid.fyi
Chilipiper
HireVox
Hubstaff Meet
Indeed Automated Scheduling
Interview Scheduler
Leera
Mathilda
MeetFrank
Olivia
RecruiterBox
Skit
hiremore AI
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Candidate assessmentJob advertising →