Interview scheduling for enterprise buyers
Asked as “interview scheduling software”, and as “recruiting coordination tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 55 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
55%
Clear leader
55GoodTime15candidate.fyi09Greenhouse22others
55% of first choices, clear leader.
Since October 2026=heldSince October 2026: 55% → 55%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.GoodTime held the lead, ±0 points on 55%, inside the 13-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Calendly50%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 41% → 50%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-market
ModernLoop28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ModernLoop (28%) replaces Calendly (20% then, 16% now), 12 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →Enterprise
GoodTime55%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 55% → 55%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This page
Calendly50%Clear leader▲+9Since October 2026: 41% → 50%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Standing →Mid-marketModernLoop28%Contested↗new leaderNew leader since October 2026: ModernLoop (28%) replaces Calendly (20% then, 16% now), 12 points clear, inside the 13-point floor.Standing →EnterpriseGoodTime55%Clear leader=heldSince October 2026: 55% → 55%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01GoodTime55%4%67endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 55% → 55%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.55% → 55%
GoodTime55%4%67endorsed leader=heldSince October 2026: 55% → 55%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.55% → 55%02
candidate.fyi15%2%46accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 15%
candidate.fyi15%2%46accepted challenger▲+11Since October 2026: 4% → 15%, +11 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 15%03ModernLoop9%2%56accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%
ModernLoop9%2%56accepted challenger▲+5Since October 2026: 4% → 9%, +5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.4% → 9%04
Greenhouse9%15%40accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%
Greenhouse9%15%40accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 7% → 9%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 9%05
Paradox2%13%38accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%
Paradox2%13%38accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 2%06
iCIMS Talent Cloud2%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
iCIMS Talent Cloud2%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%07
Cal.com2%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Cal.com2%17%12accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%08Calendly2%79%47criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 2%
Calendly2%79%47criticized challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 9% → 2%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.9% → 2%Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
13
HireVue0%36%11criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
HireVue0%36%11criticized challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%12
Workday Recruiting0%21%14accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
Workday Recruiting0%21%14accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%11
Lever0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Lever0%15%13accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%09
Ashby0%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
Ashby0%9%22accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%10
VidCruiter0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
VidCruiter0%0%14accepted challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not enterprise.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
ModernLoop vs Cal.comModernLoop vs LeverModernLoop vs GreenhouseModernLoop vs PreludeCalendly vs GoodTimeCalendly vs KoalendarCalendly vs Cal.comCalendly vs LeverCalendly vs GreenhouseCalendly vs PreludeGoodTime vs KoalendarGoodTime vs Cal.comGoodTime vs LeverGoodTime vs GreenhouseGoodTime vs PreludeKoalendar vs Cal.comKoalendar vs LeverKoalendar vs GreenhouseKoalendar vs PreludeCal.com vs LeverCal.com vs GreenhouseCal.com vs PreludeLever vs GreenhouseLever vs PreludeGreenhouse vs Prelude
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01020304050607080910111213Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01GoodTime55%
GoodTime55%02candidate.fyi15%
candidate.fyi15%03ModernLoop9%
ModernLoop9%04Greenhouse9%
Greenhouse9%05Paradox2%
Paradox2%06iCIMS Talent Cloud2%
iCIMS Talent Cloud2%07Cal.com2%
Cal.com2%08Calendly2%
Calendly2%09Ashby0%
Ashby0%10VidCruiter0%
VidCruiter0%11Lever0%
Lever0%12Workday Recruiting0%
Workday Recruiting0%13HireVue0%
HireVue0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and MiniMax M2.5 changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Calendly79%
37 of 47 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“a large enterprise, and especially regulated BFSI / healthcare, should avoid: ... Calendly is presented as sufficient only for simple one-on-one screens.” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Doodle80%
4 of 5 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Basic or consumer-focused tools (e.g., ... Doodle, or When2Meet without enterprise features)” Grok 4.20, negative prompt
Greenhouse15%
6 of 40 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Built-in ATS schedulers (e.g., Greenhouse, Lever): Often too limited for complex enterprise needs” Grok 4.20, budget prompt
Paradox13%
5 of 38 labels negative · 4 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Tools to Avoid for *Predictable Cost at Scale*... Less ideal for corporate professional roles” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.
Sites the answers cite
78 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 831 links across 170 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · ModernLoop56 answers · 87 citations · 13 models
vendor site · GoodTime44 answers · 70 citations · 14 models
33 answers · 58 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G232 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Cal.com29 answers · 38 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 32 citations · 10 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Calendly21 answers · 46 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group18 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lever16 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
14 answers · 16 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
48 answers · 11 models
26 answers · 11 models
25 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
21 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best interview scheduling software”, “interview scheduling software”, “interview scheduling tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GoodTime goodtime.io | 55% | 156 | 135,000 | 614 | 2,435 | $1,627 | 7 | 4 |
| candidate.fyi candidate.fyi | 15% | 70 | 210 | 0 | 494 | 10 | 1 | |
| ModernLoop modernloop.com | 9% | 116 | 880 | 7 | 410 | |||
| Greenhouse greenhouse.com | 9% | 401 | 301,000 | 52,273 | 62,551 | $5,545 | 74 | |
| Paradox paradox.ai | 2% | 199 | 165,000 | 27,047 | 62,844 | 2 | 5 | |
| iCIMS icims.com iCIMS Talent Cloud 2% | 2% | 40 | 27,100 | 667 | 1,165,712 company | $5,674 | 26 | |
| Cal.com cal.com | 2% | 92 | 2,900 | 100 | 439,943 | 3 | ||
| SmartRecruiters smartrecruiters.com | 2% | 168 | 9,900 | 194 | 272,094 | 0 | ||
| Prelude | 2% | 60,500 | 12,629 | |||||
| Lighthouse | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 4 of them are among the sites the models cited here (candidate.fyi, goodtime.io, peoplemanagingpeople.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best interview scheduling software” is candidate.fyi.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best interview scheduling software for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which recruiting coordination tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade interview scheduling tools and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best interview scheduling software for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating an interview scheduling software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which interview scheduling tools should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5GoodTimeagainst: Calendlyno first choiceChangedGoodTimeCal.comagainst: GoodTime, candidate.fyino first choiceagainst: Calendly, Google Calendar, Outlook, Picktime, YouCanBookMe
Two alternatives
VidCruiter, candidate.fyiFour alternatives
HireVue, ModernLoop, VidCruiter, candidate.fyiGPT-5.4 miniGoodTimeagainst: CalendlyGreenhouseChangedGoodTimeagainst: CalendlyGoodTimeno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Lever, Rooster SchedulingThree alternatives
Ashby, SmartRecruiters, iCIMS Talent CloudFive alternatives
Cronofy, Greenhouse, Guide, HireVue, ParadoxTwo alternatives
Calendly, ParadoxGemini 3.5 FlashGoodTimeagainst: Cal.com, CalendlyGoodTimeHeldagainst: CalendlyGoodTime, ModernLoopagainst: Calendly, Greenhouse, SmartRecruiters, Workday RecruitingGoodTimeagainst: Acuity Scheduling, CalendlyGoodTime, ModernLoop, candidate.fyiagainst: Ashby Native, Greenhouse, Workday Recruitingagainst: Acuity Scheduling, Calendly, Doodle, Google Calendar Appointment Schedules, Koalendar, Microsoft Bookings, Paradox, SavvyCal, TidyCal, YouCanBookMe
Three alternatives
ModernLoop, Paradox, candidate.fyiTwo alternatives
ModernLoop, ParadoxThree alternatives
Cal.com, Paradox, candidate.fyiThree alternatives
ModernLoop, Paradox, candidate.fyiTwo alternatives
Paradox, PhenomPerplexity SonarGoodTimeagainst: CalendlySmartRecruitersChangedGoodTimeagainst: CalendlyGoodTimeagainst: Calendly, HireVue, ModernLoopno first choiceagainst: Appointlet, Calendly, Doodle, HireVue
Four alternatives
ModernLoop, Native ATS scheduling, Paradox, candidate.fyiFive alternatives
GoodTime, Greenhouse, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Talent CloudFive alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, Paradox, VidCruiterOne alternative
candidate.fyiGrok 4.20candidate.fyiagainst: Calendly, Cronofy, HireVue, Spark HireGreenhouseChangedGoodTime, ModernLoopGoodTimeagainst: Cal.com, Calendly, Greenhouse, Lever, Paradoxno first choiceagainst: Calendly, Doodle, Google Calendar, When2meet
Three alternatives
GoodTime, ModernLoop, ParadoxFive alternatives
Lever, Phenom, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Talent CloudFour alternatives
Cal.com, Calendly, Paradox, candidate.fyiTwo alternatives
ModernLoop, candidate.fyiMistral SmallGoodTime, ModernLoopGreenhouseChangedAshbyGoodTimeno first choiceagainst: Calendly
One alternative
CalendlyThree alternatives
GoodTime, Paradox, candidate.fyiFive alternatives
GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, Paradox, candidate.fyiOne alternative
candidate.fyiDeepSeek V4 FlashGoodTimecandidate.fyiChangedGoodTimeagainst: Ashby, Calendly, GreenhouseGoodTimeagainst: CalendlyGoodTimeagainst: Calendlyagainst: Acuity Scheduling, Calendly, Doodle, Paradox
Two alternatives
ModernLoop, candidate.fyiFive alternatives
GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Talent CloudThree alternatives
ModernLoop, Paradox, candidate.fyiTwo alternatives
ModernLoop, VidCruiterLlama 4 Maverickcandidate.fyiGoodTime, ModernLoop, Paradox, candidate.fyiChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Ashby, GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoopSeven alternatives
Deel Hire, Fetcher, Greenhouse, Manatal, Pinpoint, SeekOut, WorkBrightQwen 3.7 FlashGoodTimeLighthouseChangedagainst: XpresshireGoodTimeagainst: CalendlyGoodTimeagainst: Calendly, Paradoxno first choiceagainst: Calendly, Google Workspace add-ins, Paradox, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SuccessFactors, Workday Recruiting
Two alternatives
Calendly, ModernLoopOne alternative
GoodTimeSix alternatives
Cal.com, Greenhouse, Lever, ModernLoop, Paradox, VidCruiterFour alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, Noon AIKimi K2GoodTimeagainst: Ashby, Calendly, GreenhouseGreenhouseChangedGoodTime, candidate.fyiagainst: CalendlyGoodTimeagainst: CalendlyGoodTime, ModernLoop, candidate.fyiagainst: Calendlyagainst: Ashby Native Scheduling, Calendly, Greenhouse, Lever, Paylocity
Two alternatives
Cal.com, ModernLoopThree alternatives
GoodTime, ModernLoop, iCIMS Talent CloudTwo alternatives
ModernLoop, ParadoxTwo alternatives
Ashby, ModernLoopFour alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, Lever, ParadoxGLM 4.7 FlashXGoodTime, ModernLoopagainst: CalendlyGoodTimeChangedGoodTime, candidate.fyiagainst: TimeTapCalendlyno first choiceagainst: Calendly Free Tier, GoodTime, Paylocity, Simple Google Calendar / Outlook Scheduling Integrations, Zoho Recruit's Scheduling Features
Two alternatives
VidCruiter, candidate.fyiFour alternatives
Greenhouse, MangoApps, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Talent CloudSix alternatives
Ashby, Cal.com, Calendly, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, ParadoxFour alternatives
Doodle, GoodTime, ModernLoop, candidate.fyiMiniMax M2.5GoodTimeGreenhouse, iCIMS Talent CloudChangedGoodTime, ModernLoopagainst: CalendlyGoodTimeagainst: Calendlyno first choiceagainst: GoodTime, Paylocity
Three alternatives
Cal.com, Greenhouse, ModernLoopThree alternatives
Cal.com, GoodTime, Workday RecruitingFive alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, Joveo, Paradox, candidate.fyiTwo alternatives
ModernLoop, candidate.fyiGPT-6 LunaGoodTimeGoodTimeHeldGoodTime, ModernLoopPreludeagainst: Calendlyno first choiceagainst: Calendly, iCIMS Talent Cloud
Two alternatives
ModernLoop, Your ATS's built-in schedulerOne alternative
ModernLoopThree alternatives
Cronofy, Paradox, PreludeOne alternative
GoodTimeMuse Glimmer 30BGoodTime, candidate.fyiGoodTime, candidate.fyiHeldcandidate.fyiagainst: Calendly, HireVueGoodTimeagainst: Calendlyno first choiceagainst: Calendly
Three alternatives
Ashby, Greenhouse, ModernLoopFive alternatives
Avature, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, SmartRecruiters, Workday Recruiting, iCIMS Talent CloudFive alternatives
Ashby, GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, ParadoxOne alternative
candidate.fyiBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:43 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 11:04 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:37 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:21 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:26 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 10:09 | yes | 5 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 11:12 | yes | 10 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 19 | 114 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:36 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 08:39 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:57 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:56 | yes | 10 | 21 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:28 | yes | 10 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:14 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:06 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:39 | yes | 24 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:45 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:26 | no | 0 | 32 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:56 | yes | 20 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 08:37 | yes | 10 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 10:03 | yes | 5 | 85 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 11:22 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:09 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:07 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 09:51 | yes | 9 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 12:19 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 11:01 | yes | 10 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:15 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 11:09 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 21 | 35 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 12:38 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 08:42 | yes | 5 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:38 | yes | 17 | 29 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 12:37 | yes | 5 | 35 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 10:32 | yes | 8 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 12 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:11 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 11:06 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:28 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 09:01 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:18 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 09:46 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 10:44 | yes | 22 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:43 | yes | 5 | 16 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 09:59 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 12:18 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:38 | yes | 23 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:25 | yes | 3 | 19 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 12:33 | yes | 13 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 09:13 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 12:53 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 09:40 | yes | 7 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 10:22 | yes | 10 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:26 | yes | 5 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 10:49 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:29 | yes | 20 | 46 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 09:12 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:08 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 10:25 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 10:24 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:37 | no | 0 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 12:00 | yes | 5 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 11:20 | yes | 14 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-11-01 10:04 | yes | 15 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-11-01 08:59 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version) | 2026-11-01 08:49 | yes | 8 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-11-01 08:58 | yes | 10 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.20 | spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai | 2026-11-01 13:11 | yes | 5 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-11-01 08:41 | yes | 13 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-11-01 11:11 | yes | 20 | 41 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-11-01 08:53 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-11-01 11:56 | yes | 8 | 43 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-11-01 12:34 | yes | 22 | 45 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-11-01 09:19 | yes | 23 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-11-01 11:03 | yes | 17 | 47 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-11-01 08:43 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-11-01 10:50 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acuity read as Acuity Scheduling
SAP read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
iCIMS read as iCIMS Talent Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
8x8/Zoom Events
Ashby Native
Ashby Native Scheduling
Calendly Enterprise with Prelude
Calendly Free Tier
Google Calendar Appointment Schedules
Google Workspace add-ins
Lever Interview
Native ATS scheduling
Outset
Rooster Scheduling
Simple Google Calendar / Outlook Scheduling Integrations
Talentpool
User Interviews
Xpresshire
Zoho Recruit's Scheduling Features
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.