Index › HR › Talent acquisition › Interview scheduling › Small business · November 2026 Edition

Interview scheduling for small business buyers

Asked as “interview scheduling software”, and as “recruiting coordination tool”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 54 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
50%
Clear leader
50Calendly15Koalendar11Cal.com24others

50% of first choices, clear leader.

Since October 2026▲+9Since October 2026: 41% → 50%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.Calendly held the lead, +9 points on 41%, inside the 13-point floor.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.

The standing

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince October 2026
01Calendly50%9%66endorsed leader▲+9Since October 2026: 41% → 50%, +9 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.41% → 50%
02Koalendar15%0%26accepted challenger▲+1Since October 2026: 14% → 15%, +1 point. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.14% → 15%
03Cal.com11%0%34accepted challenger▲+8Since October 2026: 3% → 11%, +8 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 11%
04Breezy HR7%9%23accepted challenger▲+2Since October 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 7%
05Zoho Recruit6%0%15accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
06JazzHR6%8%13accepted challenger▲+4Since October 2026: 2% → 6%, +4 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 6%
07GoodTime2%69%39criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 2%
Show the nine products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
15Paradox0%58%12criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
16VidCruiter0%55%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
14ModernLoop0%53%17criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
13Greenhouse0%47%15criticized challenger▼−3Since October 2026: 3% → 0%, −3 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.3% → 0%
12Google Calendar Lab in the set0%27%11criticized challenger=heldSince October 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.0% → 0%
10Workable0%17%18accepted challenger▼−7Since October 2026: 7% → 0%, −7 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.7% → 0%
11Ashby0%8%12accepted challenger▼−5Since October 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.5% → 0%
09Setmore0%7%14accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%
08YouCanBookMe0%6%18accepted challenger▼−2Since October 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 13-point floor: within noise.2% → 0%

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one can't be told apart from repeat variation, and both are shown. Each index measures its own floor from its own repeat, over its own categories, so the floor differs from one index to the next. Both editions asked the same fourteen models. How the floor is measured

Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.

Google Calendar is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.

Head to headHead-to-head pages are published for mid-market buyers, so these open on mid-market figures, not small business.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each

Recommended versus criticized

Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.

Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative70%
Key
01Calendly50%
02Koalendar15%
03Cal.com11%
04Breezy HR7%
05Zoho Recruit6%
06JazzHR6%
07GoodTime2%
08YouCanBookMe0%
09Setmore0%
10Workable0%
11Ashby0%
12Google Calendar0%
13Greenhouse0%
14ModernLoop0%
15Paradox0%
16VidCruiter0%

What they warned about

One of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.20, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
GoodTime
69%
27 of 39 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“GoodTime has non-transparent pricing that is expensive for smaller teams, and ATS and calendar synchronization are often quoted as "unreliable"” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
VidCruiter
55%
6 of 11 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 4 hard negative
“Full interview lifecycle platform priced for mid-size to enterprise... Starting Price: US$5,000.00” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Greenhouse
47%
7 of 15 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Why avoid: These are full ATS platforms, not just scheduling tools.” Kimi K2, negative prompt
Calendly
9%
6 of 66 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Free tier Calendly ... Why to be cautious: Simple booking tools are great for initial 15-minute phone screens, but using them beyond their limits for multi-stage hiring causes major operational headaches.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt

What they cite

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted.

Sites the answers cite

69 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 727 links across 154 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 1 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.

vendor site · Cal.com38 answers · 71 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FluentBooking30 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · FirstHR29 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
vendor site · G227 answers · 41 citations · 11 models
22 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Lever22 answers · 22 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Koalendar21 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
20 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
17 answers · 32 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Calendly17 answers · 25 citations · 8 models
17 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Lead Change Group16 answers · 21 citations · 10 models

Pages the answers cite

The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.

Search against answers

Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best interview scheduling software”, “interview scheduling software”, “interview scheduling tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Company and productsShareOwn site citedName searches, GoogleAI search demand, est.Organic visitsPaid search a month, est.Google ads, last 30 daysBest Google position
Calendly calendly.com50%214368,0002,824292,858$345
Koalendar koalendar.com15%482,400321,332,6999
Cal.com cal.com11%922,900100439,9433
Breezy breezy.hr
Breezy HR 7%
7%2263,60059178,670 company$5625
Zoho zoho.com
Zoho Recruit 6%
6%3122,900461,216,894 company$51,031119
JazzHR jazzhr.com6%14114,8007011,75419
SavvyCal savvycal.com2%8880110,407,137
AvaHR avahr.com2%9
GoodTime goodtime.io2%156135,0006142,435$1,62774
YouCanBookMe youcanbook.me0%375,4007781,63738

Google's top ten for the three searches hold 13 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (peoplemanagingpeople.com, selectsoftwarereviews.com). The first result for “best interview scheduling software” is candidate.fyi.

How they answered

Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHide
ModelDirect“What is the best interview scheduling software for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which recruiting coordination tool would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top interview scheduling tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best interview scheduling software for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating an interview scheduling software. What should we look at?”Negative“Which interview scheduling tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Calendly
Three alternativesBreezy HR, Koalendar, Zoho Recruit
no first choiceChangedCalendly, Koalendar
One alternativeZoho Recruit
Calendly
Two alternativesKoalendar, YouCanBookMe
no first choiceagainst: Calendly, GoodTime, HireVue, Sign In Scheduling
GPT-5.4 miniCalendly
Three alternativesAshby, GoodTime, Prelude
GoodTimeChanged
Three alternativesGreenhouse, Lever, Workable
Calendly
Five alternativesAshby, Breezy HR, GoodTime, Greenhouse, Zoho Recruit
Calendly
Three alternativesAshby, GoodTime, Workstream
no first choicenothing named
Gemini 3.5 FlashCalendly
Four alternativesAshby, Cal.com, ModernLoop, candidate.fyi
Breezy HRChanged
Three alternativesAshby, Recruitee, Workable
against: JazzHR
Calendly
Four alternativesAcuity Scheduling, Cal.com, SavvyCal, TidyCal
Calendly
Four alternativesSavvyCal, TidyCal, YouCanBookMe, Zoho Recruit
against: GoodTime, Prelude
Calendly
Four alternativesAshby, Cronofy, SavvyCal, Workable
against: GoodTime, Prelude
against: Calendly, GoodTime, Google Calendar Appointment Schedules, HireVue, Microsoft Bookings, ModernLoop, Oracle Taleo, Paradox, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Workday Recruiting, candidate.fyi, myInterview
Perplexity SonarCalendly
Two alternativesCal.com, Lever
against: GoodTime
JazzHRChanged
Three alternativesBreezy HR, Calendly, Zoho Recruit
against: Workable
Calendly, YouCanBookMe
Four alternativesBreezy HR, Cal.com, Koalendar, Workable
against: GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, Paradox
Calendly
Five alternativesCal.com, JazzHR, Koalendar, Microsoft Bookings, YouCanBookMe
no first choiceagainst: Appointlet, Doodle, GoodTime, HireVue, ModernLoop, Paradox, Recruitee, VidCruiter, YouCanBookMe
Grok 4.20Calendly
Four alternativesBreezy HR, Cal.com, Recruit CRM, Workable
against: GoodTime, Greenhouse, Paradox
JazzHRChanged
Four alternativesBreezy HR, Manatal, Recruit CRM, Zoho Recruit
Calendly, Koalendar
Four alternativesCal.com, GoodTime, ModernLoop, Setmore
against: Google Calendar, Greenhouse, Lever, Microsoft Bookings
Koalendar
Three alternativesCal.com, Calendly, Setmore
against: GoodTime
Calendly
Three alternativesCal.com, Greenhouse, Lever
against: Workday Recruiting
against: Calendly, GoodTime, Paradox, VidCruiter
Mistral SmallCalendly
Four alternativesCal.com, GoodTime, ModernLoop, Paradox
no first choiceChangedCalendly, Setmore
Two alternativesCal.com, Koalendar
against: GoodTime
Koalendar
Three alternativesCalendly, Google Calendar, Setmore
no first choiceagainst: Breezy HR, GoodTime, Paylocity, VidCruiter, Yello
DeepSeek V4 FlashCal.com
Three alternativesAshby, Calendly, Zoho Bookings
against: GoodTime, ModernLoop
Zoho RecruitChanged
One alternativeBreezy HR
Cal.com, Calendly
Four alternativesBreezy HR, Koalendar, YouCanBookMe, Zoho Recruit
Koalendar
Three alternativesCal.com, Calendly, Zoho Recruit
Calendly
Two alternativesFluentBooking, VidCruiter
against: GoodTime, Greenhouse
against: Breezy HR, GoodTime, HireVue, ModernLoop, Paylocity, Prelude, VidCruiter, Zapier
Llama 4 MaverickCal.com
Six alternativesBreezy HR, Calendly, GoodTime, ModernLoop, VidCruiter, WhenAvailable
no first choiceChangedno first choiceCalendly
Three alternativesBreezy HR, WhenAvailable, Workable
no first choiceagainst: GoodTime, VidCruiter
Qwen 3.7 FlashCalendly
One alternativeCal.com
against: GoodTime
Breezy HRChanged
Two alternativesCal.com, JazzHR
Calendly
Three alternativesGoodTime.ai, Google Appointments, Microsoft Bookings
Calendly
Five alternativesFluentBooking, Google Calendar, Microsoft Bookings, Setmore, YouCanBookMe
Cal.com, Koalendar
Three alternativesCalendly, ModernLoop, Prelude
against: Bookme, Calendly, Doodle, Google Calendar, Jitsi Meet, Oracle Taleo, Outlook Web, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, Setmore, Workday Recruiting, Zoho Schedule
Kimi K2Cal.com, Calendly
One alternativeKoalendar
against: GoodTime, ModernLoop, Paradox
JazzHRChanged
Four alternatives100Hires, Breezy, Cal.com, Calendly
against: Workable
Calendly
Three alternativesCal.com, Koalendar, YouCanBookMe
against: Doodle, GoodTime, ModernLoop
Koalendar, Zoho Recruit
Three alternativesCalendly, Picktime, Setmore
Calendly, SavvyCal
Three alternativesCronofy, GoodTime, Prelude
against: Calendly, GoodTime, Google Calendar, Greenhouse, Lever, ModernLoop, Outlook
GLM 4.7 FlashXCalendly
Three alternativesCal.com, Koalendar, YouCanBookMe
Breezy HRChanged
Four alternativesBambooHR, JazzHR, Workable, Zoho Recruit
Calendly, Koalendar
Four alternativesCal.com, Doodle, Setmore, YouCanBookMe
Calendly, Koalendar
Two alternativesGoogle Calendar, YouCanBookMe
Calendly
Two alternativesCal.com, Koalendar
nothing named
MiniMax M2.5Cal.com, Calendly
Two alternatives100Hires, Breezy HR
Cal.com, Zoho RecruitChanged
Three alternativesAvaHR, Breezy HR, JazzHR
Cal.com
Two alternativesCalendly, ModernLoop
against: GoodTime
Koalendar
Three alternativesCal.com, Calendly, Setmore
Calendly
Four alternativesAcuity Scheduling, Fountain, Greenhouse, Zoom Scheduler
against: GoodTime, Greenhouse, Paylocity, Workday Recruiting
GPT-6 LunaCalendly
One alternativePrelude
CalendlyHeld
One alternativeWorkable
Calendly
Three alternativesMicrosoft Bookings, Your ATS's built-in scheduler, Zoho Bookings
against: GoodTime
Calendly
One alternativeYouCanBookMe
no first choiceagainst: Calendly, GoodTime, HireVue, Paradox
Muse Glimmer 30BCalendly
Three alternativesCal.com, FluentBooking, Koalendar
against: GoodTime
AvaHR, Breezy HRChanged
Two alternativesJazzHR, Sequenzy
Calendly, Koalendar
One alternativeSetmore
against: GoodTime
Koalendar
Four alternativesCal.com, Calendly, FluentBooking, YouCanBookMe
no first choiceagainst: Ashby, Cronofy, GoodTime, Greenhouse, ModernLoop, Paylocity, Prelude, VidCruiter, Workable
Bold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against

The record

One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency.
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
PromptModelVersion stringTime (UTC)SearchedSourcesLatency
Direct recommendationClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 10:49yes107 s
Direct recommendationGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 11:43yes47 s
Direct recommendationGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:41yes617 s
Direct recommendationPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 11:47yes103 s
Direct recommendationGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:19yes1033 s
Direct recommendationMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:16yes56 s
Direct recommendationDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:26yes2026 s
Direct recommendationLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:22yes53 s
Direct recommendationQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:47yes526 s
Direct recommendationKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:49yes934 s
Direct recommendationGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 10:20yes23130 s
Direct recommendationMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:26yes524 s
Direct recommendationGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:45yes211 s
Direct recommendationMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:32yes1317 s
ParaphraseClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:56no02 s
ParaphraseGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 10:57no02 s
ParaphraseGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 11:14no015 s
ParaphrasePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:33yes103 s
ParaphraseGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:18yes522 s
ParaphraseMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 12:18no01 s
ParaphraseDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 12:20yes1917 s
ParaphraseLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:40yes53 s
ParaphraseQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 08:48yes521 s
ParaphraseKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 12:49yes1035 s
ParaphraseGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:22yes1989 s
ParaphraseMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:27yes1338 s
ParaphraseGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 08:42yes212 s
ParaphraseMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:29yes1321 s
ComparativeClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:30yes108 s
ComparativeGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:24yes47 s
ComparativeGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 12:16no014 s
ComparativePerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:58yes105 s
ComparativeGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:14yes533 s
ComparativeMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:59yes57 s
ComparativeDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 09:02yes2327 s
ComparativeLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:30yes54 s
ComparativeQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 10:48no031 s
ComparativeKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:15yes1546 s
ComparativeGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 12:32yes18165 s
ComparativeMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 10:26yes1335 s
ComparativeGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:50yes515 s
ComparativeMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 09:16yes1322 s
Budget constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 09:07yes107 s
Budget constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 08:37yes35 s
Budget constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 09:28no015 s
Budget constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:47yes103 s
Budget constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:07yes825 s
Budget constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 10:20yes55 s
Budget constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:41yes2422 s
Budget constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 12:57yes52 s
Budget constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:47yes514 s
Budget constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 09:44yes1421 s
Budget constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:02yes23101 s
Budget constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 12:15yes530 s
Budget constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 12:44yes310 s
Budget constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:26yes1321 s
Scale constrainedClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 12:51no05 s
Scale constrainedGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:54no06 s
Scale constrainedGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 10:59no015 s
Scale constrainedPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 09:25yes106 s
Scale constrainedGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:17yes527 s
Scale constrainedMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:01no06 s
Scale constrainedDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 11:20yes1020 s
Scale constrainedLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 09:11yes53 s
Scale constrainedQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 12:50yes1036 s
Scale constrainedKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:05no042 s
Scale constrainedGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 11:03yes1924 s
Scale constrainedMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 09:15no055 s
Scale constrainedGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 09:24yes215 s
Scale constrainedMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:49no07 s
Negative framingClaude Haiku 4.5claude-haiku-4-5-202510012026-11-01 11:59yes179 s
Negative framingGPT-5.4 minigpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-172026-11-01 09:49yes56 s
Negative framingGemini 3.5 Flashgemini-3.6-flash (asked for gemini-3.5-flash; the API answered as this version)2026-11-01 08:39yes1420 s
Negative framingPerplexity Sonarsonar2026-11-01 12:57yes106 s
Negative framingGrok 4.20spacexai/grok-4.20-non-reasoning via xai2026-11-01 13:10yes1935 s
Negative framingMistral Smallmistral/mistral-small via mistral2026-11-01 09:17yes108 s
Negative framingDeepSeek V4 Flashdeepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra2026-11-01 08:40yes2327 s
Negative framingLlama 4 Maverickmeta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock2026-11-01 10:35yes52 s
Negative framingQwen 3.7 Flashalibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba2026-11-01 09:26no030 s
Negative framingKimi K2moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita2026-11-01 11:08yes2344 s
Negative framingGLM 4.7 FlashXzai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai2026-11-01 09:45yes1429 s
Negative framingMiniMax M2.5minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax2026-11-01 11:48yes1843 s
Negative framingGPT-6 Lunagpt-6-luna2026-11-01 11:37yes419 s
Negative framingMuse Glimmer 30Bmeta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai2026-11-01 11:02yes2236 s

Normalization in this category

Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.

ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Acuity read as Acuity Scheduling
SAP SuccessFactors read as SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting
Workday read as Workday Recruiting
Unresolved, counted raw
Appland
Bookme
GoodTime.ai
Google Appointments
Google Calendar Appointment Schedules
Jobadda
Outlook Web
Reservio
Sequenzy
SmartRecruiters Interview Scheduling
TalentReef
Zoho Schedule
Zoom Scheduler
envisage
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.
← Candidate assessmentJob advertising →